by Ian Royal » 13 Jul 2012 16:19
by pea » 13 Jul 2012 16:20
southbank1871 It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
by Green » 13 Jul 2012 16:23
peasouthbank1871 It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
its the principle that it is intended to be behind closed doors and so club representatives such as Brian will treat it in that way. If it becomes considered 'ok' by the moderators of a site with such a huge readership as HNA? has then it erodes that principle and the club won't be able to approach those session in the same way as they evidently feel they can at the moment.
by Geekins » 13 Jul 2012 16:25
Ian Royal Dear STAR fukwits
you bunch of fuking twats.
by Wax Jacket » 13 Jul 2012 16:29
Only one Trevor Morleysouthbank1871 It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
Interesting that the club swooped within a couople of hours - obviously HNA is required reading in the comms dept.
by Simon's Church » 13 Jul 2012 16:33
by Only one Trevor Morley » 13 Jul 2012 16:35
peasouthbank1871 It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
its the principle that it is intended to be behind closed doors and so club representatives such as Brian will treat it in that way. If it becomes considered 'ok' by the moderators of a site with such a huge readership as HNA? has then it erodes that principle and the club won't be able to approach those session in the same way as they evidently feel they can at the moment.
by HoneyRoastHoax » 13 Jul 2012 16:37
by Big Foot » 13 Jul 2012 16:47
by sandman » 13 Jul 2012 16:50
by pearcetom » 13 Jul 2012 16:50
HoneyRoastHoax they are fooked if we all join as we can out vote them on anything.
by The Rouge » 13 Jul 2012 16:51
Simon's Church It's a sad day when the club feel the need to strong arm the admin of a supporters' forum because of their own oversight.
by Royal Biscuitman » 13 Jul 2012 16:52
Cypry On a serious note, I hope STAR learn from this, and make it clear to everyone what the etiquette is for the forum.
I was blissfully unaware
Cypry I know now that I've been a very naughty boy, and I will not do it again!!!!
or moderate it and nicely explain why.Turns8 My biggest gripe is this whole 'top secret' clique...you represent the fans...so instead of deleting the original thread...why not have the balls to actually post a STAR version up
Turns8 Just a shame I didn't copy and paste the original thread as I'd be reposting it as we speak!!!
1. You allow a new member to joinstarliaison As someone who has a business to run rather than spend all my time on here I apologise that I have not been replying to everyone who is slagging off STAR.
Yes it is run by volunteers (not amateurs but people who have lots of other things to do) and so things do not always happen as fast as they would if it were our job, but it is also successful at what it does. The fact that STAR members were trusted enough by Brian that he was happy to tell us more than anodyne press conferences (a special meaning to those who were there) is because of what we have done over the last 10 years. If that is ruined by one post on here (and that is entirely possible both with the team management and the club management not trusting us in future) then those of you complaining that we are seen to censor the forum will have even less information in the future. Enjoy
If one was to run a private forum and ask in the sign up process not to report the contents, would that prevent someone reporting a post?hobnob However, they are running a "private" event and don't want it reported on so you have to respect those wishes!
by Arch » 13 Jul 2012 16:55
by davis69 » 13 Jul 2012 17:02
by Simon's Church » 13 Jul 2012 17:03
The RougeSimon's Church It's a sad day when the club feel the need to strong arm the admin of a supporters' forum because of their own oversight.
STAR ran the event, Brian attended on invite.
by who are ya? » 13 Jul 2012 17:10
by Wax Jacket » 13 Jul 2012 17:11
davis69 What do you actually get from your star membership??
The chance to sit on a coach with no leg room , full of people looking there going for a lovely trip to Bognor Regis to play some bingo rather than going to a football match.
by Royal Biscuitman » 13 Jul 2012 17:13
Simon's ChurchThe RougeSimon's Church It's a sad day when the club feel the need to strong arm the admin of a supporters' forum because of their own oversight.
STAR ran the event, Brian attended on invite.
But when the club contacted hobnob they surely weren't acting at STAR's behest?
by Cpl Jones Dont panic » 13 Jul 2012 17:23
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests