by Maguire » 16 Jul 2012 14:18
by moonwalklikebas » 16 Jul 2012 14:21
Maguire I can't decide if the best bit is "Brian is personally very upset about this" ( ) or "we have nothing against you personally because you have shown genuine remorse"
What are you, a district judge?
by Turns8 » 16 Jul 2012 14:31
by bigmike » 16 Jul 2012 14:37
Turns8 This thread is getting better and better...Hall of Fame potential...
STAR - how to make yourself look really stupid, come out with a comment that "the club and Brian are very upset"...behave yourselves as has been mentioned numerous times, nothing in the forum would have been said which wasn't supposed to in anyway be spoken about outside of the forum...regardless of what any of you fleece wearing helms may want to try and make out in your defence.
But hey, you've got me worried...I'm half expecting a call from the club or a letter at home when I get in to say that my ST has been cancelled and I'm banned from going to matches because I've seen some top secret information!!!
This little incident will do nothing for your credibility and I agree that Crypy should ask for his money back...Oh and incidently has anyone from the club actually contacted Hobnob or STAR or has this just been completely made up to try and help STAR out of the mess!!!
by blindedbythelights » 16 Jul 2012 14:42
by bigmike » 16 Jul 2012 14:45
blindedbythelights starliason just logged on and off again
shambles
by The Rouge » 16 Jul 2012 14:46
by TFF » 16 Jul 2012 14:56
blindedbythelights starliason just logged on and off again
by pea » 16 Jul 2012 15:04
by TBM » 16 Jul 2012 15:14
The Rouge 4. Are these guys a bunch of helmets?
TBM
by moonwalklikebas » 16 Jul 2012 15:19
TBMThe Rouge 4. Are these guys a bunch of helmets?TBM
Naaaaaa!
by Royal Biscuitman » 16 Jul 2012 15:53
by Arch » 16 Jul 2012 15:53
Z175 I'm very surprised at the abuse of STAR in this thread. In my humble opinion, its unwarranted and bang out of order.
I'm not a do-gooder myself, and I'm not a committee type person and don't normally appreciate such people. But in the case of STAR, they have an important role to bridge the fans and the club. I'm grateful to the individuals who run it and organise it, like many fans, I'm not currently a member, I rarely use the coaches and I've never been to a fans forum.
I logged into last week HNA to see if there was any gossip from the forum, and not seeing much, remembered that its normally kept behind closed doors.
I appreciate that not everyone would know this and thus I'm not surprised somebody posted a transcript, and equally I'm not surprised the CLUB asked HNA to remove it. I fail to see that this has much to do with STAR at all. Had I posted the transcript, I would not like to be recipient of a PM telling me off, who would?!I had a PM on Friday from STAR, effectively telling me that the situation was my fault, apparently I should have known about the history of these events without needing to be told. It was also made clear that the club and Brian personally are "very upset" - again, the implication being that my actions, and my actions alone have upset them, and STAR now have a lot to do to repair the relationship.
Finally I was told that STAR have nothing against me "because you have shown remorse" - again the implication is that all this is my fault
But I don't see that the content of that apparent PM is anything to get worked up about, its more just contextualising the fact the thread needed to be removed. The thread was written on HNA and removed at the request of the CLUB. STAR are just caught in the middle, which suggests they are indeeed fulfuilling exactly that remit, to be in the middle. To post pictures of the people running this organisation on a messageboard is to invite trolling and toally disincentivise individuals from giving their time and effort to add something to our following of RFC.
Finally, most people know that Brian is selective with his words to the media. He took the opportunity to be honest at the forum, and it sounds like that puts the club in the unfortunate situation of practically lying about events in January. Not having read the offending thread or been to the forum, thats my assumption. I cant think any of us would like this "fact" publicised widely, because if the players were to consider this when we finish 8th this season, history will no doubt repeat itself. 3 years, continuity, lets not upset the boat. Its in all of our interests to accept no one is to blame, the thread is gone, who knows what happened, in the words of Brian, "We move on".
by HoneyRoastHoax » 16 Jul 2012 16:03
by Magic_Shovel » 16 Jul 2012 16:28
by Royal Biscuitman » 16 Jul 2012 16:30
Maybe they should focus on the fans as the foundations on the club side are well bedded.Z175 in the case of STAR, they have an important role to bridge the fans and the club.
by melonhead » 16 Jul 2012 16:33
TBM
by SLAMMED » 16 Jul 2012 16:33
by Royal Biscuitman » 16 Jul 2012 16:40
by Royal Lady » 16 Jul 2012 16:41
Royal Biscuitman I feel the biggest (perhaps only) failing of STAR is communication with the fans, It's not timely and perhaps not clear and in the case of the PM to Cypry even threatening. Perhaps this miscommunication is distorting our view of STAR? - I can't imagine they communicate with the club in this way.
As for bridging the gap between fans and the club, They should remember they are not in neutral and certainly not in bed with the club, They are a Supporters Trust and they need to represent the supporters and the supporters have to trust them.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 38 guests