by Salford Royal » 11 Jul 2012 09:57
by bracksroyal10 » 11 Jul 2012 10:07
by loyalroyal4life » 11 Jul 2012 10:27
by Isaac Hunt » 11 Jul 2012 10:55
by Reading4eva » 11 Jul 2012 11:15
by pea » 11 Jul 2012 11:31
by Norfolk Royal » 11 Jul 2012 11:37
by genome » 11 Jul 2012 12:47
by Barry the bird boggler » 11 Jul 2012 15:23
by Blakey's Right Peg » 11 Jul 2012 18:48
by Blakey's Right Peg » 16 Jul 2012 22:53
by Franchise FC » 17 Jul 2012 06:15
Blakey's Right Peg Mirror apparently suggesting we have offered £4 million for Naughton.
by Brain Traysers » 17 Jul 2012 10:21
Blakey's Right Peg Mirror apparently suggesting we have offered £4 million for Naughton.
by Royal Rascal » 17 Jul 2012 23:09
TheSiege I don't quite get this. Kyle Naughton is a good player and I'm sure, had he been the first signing of the season, all of this forum would have been pleased. However, we have now covered all of our problem positions - including the acquisition of Gunter at RB. No way, surely, are we going to have a 25-man squad consisting of three RB's. Potentially, we have three problem areas in terms of depth, CB, Creative Midfield and Striker. Given those areas, why would we buy another RB - however good?
by Albert Spangler » 17 Jul 2012 23:13
by Wuzzy87 » 18 Jul 2012 09:24
TheSiege
WE NEED A CREATIVE MIDFIELDER OR A PERSON TO WHOM WE COULD GIVE A FREE ROLE!!!!!!! Being a defender is good! Being an attacker is good! Being Lionel Messi is brilliant!! Show me a man who thinks that we don't need a creative midfielder and I will show you a man who wants us to buy Emile Heskey - YES, that moronic!!!
by LumpWarden » 18 Jul 2012 09:34
Royal RascalTheSiege I don't quite get this. Kyle Naughton is a good player and I'm sure, had he been the first signing of the season, all of this forum would have been pleased. However, we have now covered all of our problem positions - including the acquisition of Gunter at RB. No way, surely, are we going to have a 25-man squad consisting of three RB's. Potentially, we have three problem areas in terms of depth, CB, Creative Midfield and Striker. Given those areas, why would we buy another RB - however good?
i don't get it either. it's almost as if the papers are talking absolute shit.
by loyalroyal4life » 18 Jul 2012 09:39
by Albert Spangler » 18 Jul 2012 11:18
Wuzzy87TheSiege
WE NEED A CREATIVE MIDFIELDER OR A PERSON TO WHOM WE COULD GIVE A FREE ROLE!!!!!!! Being a defender is good! Being an attacker is good! Being Lionel Messi is brilliant!! Show me a man who thinks that we don't need a creative midfielder and I will show you a man who wants us to buy Emile Heskey - YES, that moronic!!!
We don't, its obvious to me that we are looking to play 4-4-2 much how we played last year. We have 2 forwards able to hold up the ball in Pogrebnyak and Roberts which will be our main outlet.
We didn't need an attacking midfielder last year and unless Brian wants to change the whole style of football that we play then we will stick to what got us promotion.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 25 guests