by Deadlock » 20 Aug 2012 09:55
by TBM » 20 Aug 2012 10:05
by Ups and Downs » 20 Aug 2012 10:32
by The Rouge » 20 Aug 2012 10:36
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Aug 2012 10:45
by Royal Lady » 20 Aug 2012 11:51
Alexander Litvinenko Purely and simply, this is because Compass, the company who bought the contract from RFC, want to keep costs as low as possible in order to keep profits as high as possible.
So the staff behind the bars are mainly agency staff on minimum wage.
Can people really expect them to be motivated, efficient or customer-focussed? Would you be in their situation?
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Aug 2012 11:57
Royal LadyAlexander Litvinenko Purely and simply, this is because Compass, the company who bought the contract from RFC, want to keep costs as low as possible in order to keep profits as high as possible.
So the staff behind the bars are mainly agency staff on minimum wage.
Can people really expect them to be motivated, efficient or customer-focussed? Would you be in their situation?
Can't RFC put the contract up for renewal at some point?
by Green » 20 Aug 2012 13:16
by Stuka » 20 Aug 2012 13:20
by shart3 » 20 Aug 2012 13:22
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Aug 2012 13:30
by Green » 20 Aug 2012 13:36
by RoyalBlue » 20 Aug 2012 14:07
Alexander LitvinenkoRoyal LadyAlexander Litvinenko Purely and simply, this is because Compass, the company who bought the contract from RFC, want to keep costs as low as possible in order to keep profits as high as possible.
So the staff behind the bars are mainly agency staff on minimum wage.
Can people really expect them to be motivated, efficient or customer-focussed? Would you be in their situation?
Can't RFC put the contract up for renewal at some point?
Don't know how long it lasts or what the terms & conditions are.
But inevitably, RFC will go for the contractor who offers them the most, which means the one which keeps costs as low as possible in order to keep profits as high as possible ... so they'll do the same. There's no money in improving customer service when you have a captive market - the only possible benefit is selling more if you do it more quickly, but there's the continual problem that when staff are used on so few occasions in the year it's inevitable they'll be demotivated, on minimum-wage and with high staff-turnover and minimal training they're likely to be unfamiliar with the set-up and routines.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Aug 2012 14:10
by Royal Lady » 20 Aug 2012 15:59
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Aug 2012 16:05
Royal Lady I always assumed, obviously incorrectly, that the club were in charge of the catering in as much as costs etc and just hired Compass to do the purchasing and staffing.
by The Rouge » 20 Aug 2012 16:13
Alexander LitvinenkoRoyal Lady I always assumed, obviously incorrectly, that the club were in charge of the catering in as much as costs etc and just hired Compass to do the purchasing and staffing.
No, definitely not. Compass run it (and the conference centre catering) lock stock and badly kept barrel.
by melonhead » 20 Aug 2012 16:34
by Royal Lady » 20 Aug 2012 17:54
by St Pauli » 20 Aug 2012 17:59
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 67 guests