Schards#2
So you don't think dropping him after his first bad run of form in years would dent his confidence further?
Genius
That's not what I said. Are you being deliberately stupid?
by Stuboo » 29 Aug 2012 20:21
by Ian Royal » 29 Aug 2012 20:41
Schards#2
So you don't think dropping him after his first bad run of form in years would dent his confidence further?
Genius
by Schards#2 » 29 Aug 2012 20:57
Ian RoyalSchards#2
So you don't think dropping him after his first bad run of form in years would dent his confidence further?
Genius
That's not what I said. Are you being deliberately stupid?
by Ian Royal » 29 Aug 2012 21:20
by peterroyal76 » 29 Aug 2012 21:26
by Snowball » 29 Aug 2012 21:34
Royal With CheeseRoyalJames101 If you don't like Federici, fine, just don't be a mong about it.
That's the problem - a significant majority of HNA posters are just that, mongs with the intellectual capacity of cottage cheese. It's a cross we've had to bear for generations.
by Snowball » 29 Aug 2012 21:37
cmonurzRoyalBlue I remain entirely confident that Bibbo and McDermott will make the right call in terms of what is right for Feds and the team.
That's great, but there's not much point to a discussion board if we posted that on every thread.
by Snowball » 29 Aug 2012 21:44
by winchester_royal » 29 Aug 2012 21:48
Ian Royal You said he shouldn't be dropped because it could damage his confidence and ruin him as a player.
I said that's a rubbish point because you shouldn't play someone out of fear of making them "cry" by dropping them.
You said I thought McDermott wouldn't drop him in case he cried.
I told you I was taking the piss out of your post.
You then said I didn't think dropping him would damage his confidence.
My view, which is already on here and I think directly above the post I made quoting your original stupid point, is that Federici deserves another couple of games after the break to prove he can recover and if he's not improved significantly he should be dropped. And I don't give a shit if it damages his confidence, because a) he won't be playing and b) if being dropped for playing shit damages his confidence to the point of ruining him for us, he isn't strong enough mentally to be a Premier League goalkeeper. And it can't make him much worse at the moment anyway.
It's not hard, if you try very hard you may be able to get past your dislike of me, engage your brain and work it out.
by royal67 » 29 Aug 2012 22:26
LoyalRoyalFan Same people reading out the same lines over and over again.
'He was the best keeper in the Championship last season'
Well, we might be in the Championship next season if he continues to make mistakes.
by Stuboo » 29 Aug 2012 22:33
by sandman » 29 Aug 2012 22:38
by LoyalRoyalFan » 29 Aug 2012 22:40
sandman When this break is over he should come back and treat it like it's the start of the season. The break couldn't come at a better time for Feds and it will give him time to recover from any niggles he may have. If he is still struggling after a couple of games then by all means bring in Taylor and give him a break.
by RoyalJames101 » 29 Aug 2012 22:56
LoyalRoyalFansandman When this break is over he should come back and treat it like it's the start of the season. The break couldn't come at a better time for Feds and it will give him time to recover from any niggles he may have. If he is still struggling after a couple of games then by all means bring in Taylor and give him a break.
Taylor?
Bring in McCarthy - who is better than Federici as well.
by sandman » 29 Aug 2012 22:56
RoyalJames101LoyalRoyalFansandman When this break is over he should come back and treat it like it's the start of the season. The break couldn't come at a better time for Feds and it will give him time to recover from any niggles he may have. If he is still struggling after a couple of games then by all means bring in Taylor and give him a break.
Taylor?
Bring in McCarthy - who is better than Federici as well.
oxf*rd LOL. On what basis? A handful of games that he played for us at a time when the defence were superb and he didn't have that much to do? What about his loan at Ipswich? Looked average at best. Not saying he won't be better in the future, but for now, no chance.
FWIW I think Andersen is better than McCarthy and will be our next number 1.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Aug 2012 23:17
by SCIAG » 29 Aug 2012 23:47
Stuboo To me, when he's himself, Federici is a very, very good keeper. Just to throw this out there, who do you think is better (at their peak) Federici or Hahnemann? They're much the same, to me.
RoyalJames101LoyalRoyalFansandman When this break is over he should come back and treat it like it's the start of the season. The break couldn't come at a better time for Feds and it will give him time to recover from any niggles he may have. If he is still struggling after a couple of games then by all means bring in Taylor and give him a break.
Taylor?
Bring in McCarthy - who is better than Federici as well.
oxf*rd LOL. On what basis? A handful of games that he played for us at a time when the defence were superb and he didn't have that much to do? What about his loan at Ipswich? Looked average at best. Not saying he won't be better in the future, but for now, no chance.
FWIW I think Andersen is better than McCarthy and will be our next number 1.
by Stuboo » 30 Aug 2012 00:43
by Extended-Phenotype » 30 Aug 2012 08:38
by sandman » 30 Aug 2012 08:53
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], super darren caskey, Sutekh and 245 guests