Lawro's Predictions

[Extended-Phenotype]

Bit unfair that last bit ^

Feds was already past the penalty spot before the ball went in, so was only a few yards away from being back in goal.

Are you saying leaving f/cking sooner wouldn't have resolved that problem?

[Ian Royal]

Yeah well said. Apart from being wrong, and that we have been relegated by one goal before, well said.

And It wasn't going up for the corner that was necessarily the mistake. Go up for a last corner – I’m groovy with that. But do remember to get back in goal again and not wander around like a f/cking desperate podgy-faced convict in the oppositions area for an eternity while the opposition win back possession and kick it into an empty net.

One, two, three mistakes.

Kiss it.

No way feds could have got back in time to be in goal for that, so one point is utterly ridiculous. I don't care if we've been relegated by one goal before, certainly not in my time supporting the club as it happens, but if you could read, you illiterate gnome filating arsegoblin, you'd realise I said we won't be relegated by 1 goal. ie this season. And even if we were it would have nothing to do with conceeding a goal in the last minute against CHelsea, and everything to do with being not good enough in another 36 matches.

[philM]

Bit unfair that last bit ^

Feds was already past the penalty spot before the ball went in, so was only a few yards away from being back in goal.

Are you saying leaving f/cking sooner wouldn't have resolved that problem?

No, I'm saying that he wasn't wandering around like a f/cking desperate podgy-faced convict in the oppositions area while they kicked the ball into an empty net.

[Extended-Phenotype]

Ok. Leaving sooner, in my opinion, would have resulted in Feds being back in goal sooner. Providing he was running towards the goal of course and not say, down the tunnel or burrowing through the Earth.

Not being able to reach the cross he should have f/cked off back to goal because the opposition might regain possession and score. I can’t think of any possible way to prove that is what would happen.

Other than it f/cking happening, of course.

[Stuboo]

Ok. Leaving sooner, in my opinion, would have resulted in Feds being back in goal sooner. Providing he was running towards the goal of course and not say, down the tunnel or burrowing through the Earth.

Not being able to reach the cross he should have f/cked off back to goal because the opposition might regain possession and score. I can’t think of any possible way to prove that is what would happen.

Other than it f/cking happening, of course.

I must say I find your attitude and your posts on here ridiculous - Taking cheap shots at other posters, throwing your weight around and belittling your own team - all highly irritating. And accusing Federici of wandering "around like a f/cking desperate podgy-faced convict." Brilliant mate. If you want to get a fair hearing for your arguments I suggest you moderate your language and stop behaving like a d*ck.

[Derbyshire Royal]

Ok. Leaving sooner, in my opinion, would have resulted in Feds being back in goal sooner. Providing he was running towards the goal of course and not say, down the tunnel or burrowing through the Earth.

Not being able to reach the cross he should have f/cked off back to goal because the opposition might regain possession and score. I can’t think of any possible way to prove that is what would happen.

Other than it f/cking happening, of course.

I must say I find your attitude and your posts on here ridiculous - Taking cheap shots at other posters, throwing your weight around and belittling your own team - all highly irritating. And accusing Federici of wandering "around like a f/cking desperate podgy-faced convict." Brilliant mate. If you want to get a fair hearing for your arguments I suggest you moderate your language and stop behaving like a d*ck.

Duck?

[Extended-Phenotype]

Ok. Leaving sooner, in my opinion, would have resulted in Feds being back in goal sooner. Providing he was running towards the goal of course and not say, down the tunnel or burrowing through the Earth.

Not being able to reach the cross he should have f/cked off back to goal because the opposition might regain possession and score. I can’t think of any possible way to prove that is what would happen.

Other than it f/cking happening, of course.

I must say I find your attitude and your posts on here ridiculous - Taking cheap shots at other posters, throwing your weight around and belittling your own team - all highly irritating. And accusing Federici of wandering "around like a f/cking desperate podgy-faced convict." Brilliant mate. If you want to get a fair hearing for your arguments I suggest you moderate your language and stop behaving like a d*ck.

Welcome to hob nob

Aye, you might be just a touch precious to enjoy it here, bud. Have some valerian tea and try a different forum - http://www.pofacedandprolapsed.com for example.

[Stuboo]

Aye, you might be just a touch precious to enjoy it here, bud. Have some valerian tea and try a different forum - http://www.pofacedandprolapsed.com for example.

Thanks for the advice.

[Extended-Phenotype]

Here to help.

[reading_fan]

Just one observation on Federici at Chelsea. Say Feds had have made back in to his goal in sufficient time to face the counter attack from Chelsea. There were at least 3 players in the counter attack, maybe four iirc, so the odds on him preventing a goal being scored in that situation would still be slim to none.

[Extended-Phenotype]

Better odds than man vs empty net dontcha think?

Goalkeepers make little difference to half the goals scored in football, not sure I'd be up for their extinction just yet.

[mr_number]

Better odds than man vs empty net dontcha think?

I think a few people would dispute that currently, ho ho

[reading_fan]

Better odds than man vs empty net dontcha think?

Goalkeepers make little difference to half the goals scored in football, not sure I'd be up for their extinction just yet.

Well, yes, obviously better than not being there at all. But I do think it is a touch harsh to label Chelsea's 4th goal as Fed's fault

[Extended-Phenotype]

Better odds than man vs empty net dontcha think?

Goalkeepers make little difference to half the goals scored in football, not sure I'd be up for their extinction just yet.

Well, yes, obviously better than not being there at all. But I do think it is a touch harsh to label Chelsea's 4th goal as Fed's fault

Fair enough. But in my mind he dawdled, something he wouldn't have done had he not been desperate.

[creative_username_1]

Lawro lost 480 today

[winchester_royal]

Aye, you might be just a touch precious to enjoy it here, bud. Have some valerian tea and try a different forum - http://www.pofacedandprolapsed.com for example.

F*ck you E-P. Had me all excited thinking that was a real forum for a second .

[creative_username_1]

LAwro lost his shirt this weekend -£919

[Stuboo]

LAwro lost his shirt this weekend -£919

Are you still in the Lawro makes good predictions camp, or are you starting to waver?

[creative_username_1]

I'm half tempted to build a little app that would let people do the Lawro predictions
pull the prices with Betfairs API and then compare how everyone gets on. Just a bit
of fun.

Everyone thinks his predictions are terrible but for the last couple of years they haven't
been, he usually makes good money. I wouldn't base any decisions on anything he says
but i find it quite interesting to take a look at these things. The general consensus is
that he's rubbish but only based on anecdotal evidence that he predicted there team
to lose and they didn't.

[Ian Royal]

I'm half tempted to build a little app that would let people do the Lawro predictions
pull the prices with Betfairs API and then compare how everyone gets on. Just a bit
of fun.

Everyone thinks his predictions are terrible but for the last couple of years they haven't
been, he usually makes good money. I wouldn't base any decisions on anything he says
but i find it quite interesting to take a look at these things. The general consensus is
that he's rubbish but only based on anecdotal evidence that he predicted there team
to lose and they didn't.

I'd probably have a crack at that for a laugh if you put it up on GE or Comps. Although I'd probably forget to do it mot weeks. Baring in mind he's an expert pundit and ex-professional player, he ought to slaughter everyone on here who competes with him, over any longer period that a couple of weeks.