by From Despair To Where? » 12 Sep 2012 22:09
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 12 Sep 2012 22:10
Ian RoyalRev Algenon Stickleback Hexileinleeds They had problems the year before. Yet they still gave the smaller stand to Liverpool fans, with fewer turnstiles.
Hardly the most important point in all of this, but I've no idea why people keep bringing this point up. It's not as if it was pay on the day.
It's not as if 10,000 Liverpool fans need more space than 10,000 Forest fans would.
I'd assumed from what was said that the capacities were different? Wasn't there a problem with the stated capacity being overcalculated? So if that stand was smaller, but given the same capacity, that would certainly have contributed to some of the crush.
The Leppings Lane stand certainly had much fewer turnstiles causing congestion and delaying the fans ability to actually get in.
by Stuboo » 12 Sep 2012 22:20
by Tony Le Mesmer » 12 Sep 2012 22:22
MaguireRoyal With CheeseMaguire How come it didn't happen to any of those clubs then? All took thousands upon thousands of fans to terraced matches for decades, including games at Hillsborough.
Sheer good fortune? Or did they just have fewer people turning up l8 to rush the gates? Is it nothing more than sheer coincidence that it was Liverpool fans who were involved in the two worst crowd disasters in the 80s?
Are all questions people ask.
Some people still believe the earth is flat and the holocaust never happened.
They're all fcuking idiots too.
Yes they're exactly the same thing, aren't they?
What's your angle on this anyway? Every time the subject comes up you stride about the thread chucking abuse around and acting like the world authority on Hillsborough. It seems to hold a particularly close place to your heart.
I remember one of the very first times I came on this site (under a long-dead username) I posted a (genuine) comment that somebody I know who was there (an ex-g/fs dad) said that he thought the Liverpool fans had to take some portion of the blame. You went absolutely nuts at me, and it wasn't even my opinion. Was only my sixth ever post or something and I thought "pfuck this lot" and didn't come back for years.
Arch is another one - definitely some hidden emotion there, always goes ballistic on the topic.
by Maguire » 12 Sep 2012 22:41
by who are ya? » 12 Sep 2012 22:45
by Royal With Cheese » 12 Sep 2012 23:18
Maguire What's your angle on this anyway? Every time the subject comes up you stride about the thread chucking abuse around and acting like the world authority on Hillsborough. It seems to hold a particularly close place to your heart.
by Maguire » 12 Sep 2012 23:55
Royal With CheeseMaguire What's your angle on this anyway? Every time the subject comes up you stride about the thread chucking abuse around and acting like the world authority on Hillsborough. It seems to hold a particularly close place to your heart.
I was there
by Royal With Cheese » 13 Sep 2012 00:02
by philM » 13 Sep 2012 07:58
by Wizard » 13 Sep 2012 08:28
by paultheroyal » 13 Sep 2012 08:31
by Wizard » 13 Sep 2012 08:34
by soggy biscuit » 13 Sep 2012 08:35
by Schards#2 » 13 Sep 2012 09:13
philM Thinking about the statements that were altered..
This looks to me like it was done centrally. Sections were simply scored out. If the police who wrote them were involved surely they would have just got them to re-write the statements.
The police weren't very popular around then, and the Government would have been worried about riots etc if the police were seen to be at fault in any way for Hillsborough, so the way to "defuse"" the situation was to shift the blame on to the fans.
Stinks of Thatcher to me. I wonder if we'll ever find out who used the pen, and who told them to.
Maybe it'll all be blamed on the (deceased) Chief Constable.
by Terminal Boardom » 13 Sep 2012 09:19
Schards#2philM Thinking about the statements that were altered..
This looks to me like it was done centrally. Sections were simply scored out. If the police who wrote them were involved surely they would have just got them to re-write the statements.
The police weren't very popular around then, and the Government would have been worried about riots etc if the police were seen to be at fault in any way for Hillsborough, so the way to "defuse"" the situation was to shift the blame on to the fans.
Stinks of Thatcher to me. I wonder if we'll ever find out who used the pen, and who told them to.
Maybe it'll all be blamed on the (deceased) Chief Constable.
You're an idiot
by Schards#2 » 13 Sep 2012 09:21
Terminal BoardomSchards#2philM Thinking about the statements that were altered..
This looks to me like it was done centrally. Sections were simply scored out. If the police who wrote them were involved surely they would have just got them to re-write the statements.
The police weren't very popular around then, and the Government would have been worried about riots etc if the police were seen to be at fault in any way for Hillsborough, so the way to "defuse"" the situation was to shift the blame on to the fans.
Stinks of Thatcher to me. I wonder if we'll ever find out who used the pen, and who told them to.
Maybe it'll all be blamed on the (deceased) Chief Constable.
You're an idiot
Quite happy to go with the Thatcher conspiracy. She hated and effectively destroyed the Trade Union movement and the government was dead against football. remember that Hillsbrough was a few years after Heysel, Bradford and Birmingham as well as at a time when Thatcher was desperate to introduce membership card schemes throughout the game. Throw in the ban on away fans by Luton Town and the government's attitude has been clear for all to see. Hopefully, the time will coome when a line can be drawn under the whole Hillsbrough affair. Events of the last 24 hours or so is a start.
by cmonurz » 13 Sep 2012 09:30
by Silver Fox » 13 Sep 2012 09:43
by Schards#2 » 13 Sep 2012 09:55
Silver Fox I can't remember the exact wording from the news reports last night but they were saying that Thatch was told in cabinet that South Yorks OB were covering up and lying and this was pretty much standard for them. i'd guess a government that cared about the victims would have done something about this
but then I'm probably an idiot
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests