Snowball McCarthy's first save v Spurs was very good.
No it wasn't. He pushed it into danger which meant he had to make an unnecessary second save.
by sandman » 18 Sep 2012 17:43
Snowball McCarthy's first save v Spurs was very good.
by melonhead » 18 Sep 2012 17:44
McCarthy's first save v Spurs was very good. And BTW, for 30 minutes there was nothing wrong
with his distribution.
by sandman » 18 Sep 2012 17:47
melonheadMcCarthy's first save v Spurs was very good. And BTW, for 30 minutes there was nothing wrong
with his distribution.
didnt he pass straight to one of their players in our box during that period?
or am i misremembering?
by Stooper » 18 Sep 2012 17:57
by Ian Royal » 18 Sep 2012 18:08
sandmanSnowball McCarthy's first save v Spurs was very good.
No it wasn't. He pushed it into danger which meant he had to make an unnecessary second save.
by loyalroyal4life » 18 Sep 2012 18:12
Stooper LOL - Fed wanted the Prem for so long he went as far as touting himself to clubs.
You got there, you fu(ked it up, now you're throwing your toys out the Prem.
Bye Feds!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ading.html
by TBM » 18 Sep 2012 18:41
by LoyalRoyal22 » 18 Sep 2012 18:52
by retro royal » 18 Sep 2012 19:04
by Wimb » 18 Sep 2012 19:06
retro royal I have a feeling there's more of this to come, Karacan, Pearce out contract next year players like Church and Kanu, Hunt and Feds probably expected a decent pay increase and I presume as the majority came through the youth team didn't have decent clauses that if we went up they would be rewarded like first team players. Then see the new players that have come in probably on more than all of them, has probably caused all this.
Time will tell, in Brian we trust, but are his hands being tied
by harryroyal » 18 Sep 2012 19:24
by biscuitman » 18 Sep 2012 19:33
adam "prima donna" federici
by robbieroyal » 18 Sep 2012 19:35
by Thou Voice » 18 Sep 2012 19:51
pea So Feds is at odds with the manager over a selection choice and at odds with the physio over a medical assessment of his injury. Needs to take a step back and think rationally about this IMO
by Divvy » 18 Sep 2012 19:54
robbieroyal I'm really surprised Feds has the nerve to kick off like this, as BM says no one is un-droppable.
This whole situation has got well out of hand....
Judging by what AMc is saying Brian has promised him a decent run in the side.
by facaldaqui » 18 Sep 2012 20:06
Divvyrobbieroyal I'm really surprised Feds has the nerve to kick off like this, as BM says no one is un-droppable.
This whole situation has got well out of hand....
Judging by what AMc is saying Brian has promised him a decent run in the side.
As mentioned, he did it before when he didn't get his place back when he returned from injury and McDermott stuck with McCarthy, who by that point was playing well and should have felt very hard done by when he was benched to keep the peace. Brian caved in, clear and simple, but this time he needs to stand his ground. Managing in the Premiership is a different ball game altogether. If you don't stamp your authority on the dressing room, you will lose them, and it will all fall apart.
For now, Feds deserves to be No.2 and McCarthy has earned the right to start. It's now up to Alex to keep the shirt, and Adam to work hard to get another chance. Failing that, January wont be far away and the arrogant little twat can leave. We have Stuart Taylor, more than suitable if called upon, Alex McCarthy and the impressive Mikkel Andersen all vying for the shirt. It's probably our strongest position, so more fool Adam Federici for getting way above his station.
by Platypuss » 18 Sep 2012 20:12
facaldaqui Have a heart. We've no evidence, other than tweets by his women, that he is getting above his station; certainly we have no evidence that he has rebelled against Brian in any way.
by blueroyals » 18 Sep 2012 20:22
by facaldaqui » 18 Sep 2012 20:29
Platypussfacaldaqui Have a heart. We've no evidence, other than tweets by his women, that he is getting above his station; certainly we have no evidence that he has rebelled against Brian in any way.
by philM » 18 Sep 2012 20:41
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 244 guests