by Simon's Church » 09 Oct 2012 08:06
by Big Foot » 09 Oct 2012 08:34
Asking for perspective after comparing following in the footsteps of Schmeichel and Van der Sar at Old Trafford to following Hahnemann at the Madejski? LOL, I suggest you taste your own medicine first sir.PistolPete Reading fans, you embarrass me.
There is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have. It was an ideal game for McCarthy in that he was able to look good; keepers dream of games like that. In fact, had McCarthy not got lucky with the post on either of those saves they would have been errors (I genuinely think that both Luke Moore's header and Ki Sung Yeung's long range shot should have been comfortably pushed around the post). Don't get me wrong, McCarthy is a good keeper, but he's been shaky so far - 31st minute vs Tottenham anyone? People who say McCarthy made 'worldy' saves against Swansea need to get their eyes checked.
It was however fair and correct that Federici was dropped, he deserved to be with his two errors costing us up to 5 points. But let's not chastise one of Federici's greatest character traits, his ambition. The same ambition that caused his 'disgraceful' come-and-get-me pleas to the premiership and of course him taking the dropping so badly. But his ambition isn't all bad, we were shown early signs of this ambition when he riskily left Australia without a club, begging clubs like Wolves and Leeds to give him a trial. It's the same ambition that has led him to work hard enough to gain a full time contract at Reading and national caps for Australia despite not having the backing of a great youth set up like many top pros. Come on, honestly, who here wouldn't have wanted a move to the premiership if they weren't a Reading fan? Anyone who say's they wouldn't is either unambitious or a lier.
But again to the question of whether Federici is a worse keeper than McCarthy all of a sudden? No, in my opinion. Could McCarthy become better than Federici? Perhaps. However, ask Ipswich fans what they think of McCarthy and the reviews will be decidely mixed. Goalkeeping is a strange position, just ask De Gea, Bosnich, Taibi and Tim Howard- all of whom had big reputations before wobbling at Old Trafford. Federici had a wobble, that is all!
So please, can we get some perspective and try to stop being so fickle, hypocritical and sanctimonious?
by Billy The Fish » 09 Oct 2012 09:04
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 09 Oct 2012 09:29
There is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have.
by PistolPete » 09 Oct 2012 11:19
BraisingsteakRoyalThere is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have.
You had me at this.
by PistolPete » 09 Oct 2012 11:21
Big FootAsking for perspective after comparing following in the footsteps of Schmeichel and Van der Sar at Old Trafford to following Hahnemann at the Madejski? LOL, I suggest you taste your own medicine first sir.PistolPete Reading fans, you embarrass me.
There is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have. It was an ideal game for McCarthy in that he was able to look good; keepers dream of games like that. In fact, had McCarthy not got lucky with the post on either of those saves they would have been errors (I genuinely think that both Luke Moore's header and Ki Sung Yeung's long range shot should have been comfortably pushed around the post). Don't get me wrong, McCarthy is a good keeper, but he's been shaky so far - 31st minute vs Tottenham anyone? People who say McCarthy made 'worldy' saves against Swansea need to get their eyes checked.
It was however fair and correct that Federici was dropped, he deserved to be with his two errors costing us up to 5 points. But let's not chastise one of Federici's greatest character traits, his ambition. The same ambition that caused his 'disgraceful' come-and-get-me pleas to the premiership and of course him taking the dropping so badly. But his ambition isn't all bad, we were shown early signs of this ambition when he riskily left Australia without a club, begging clubs like Wolves and Leeds to give him a trial. It's the same ambition that has led him to work hard enough to gain a full time contract at Reading and national caps for Australia despite not having the backing of a great youth set up like many top pros. Come on, honestly, who here wouldn't have wanted a move to the premiership if they weren't a Reading fan? Anyone who say's they wouldn't is either unambitious or a lier.
But again to the question of whether Federici is a worse keeper than McCarthy all of a sudden? No, in my opinion. Could McCarthy become better than Federici? Perhaps. However, ask Ipswich fans what they think of McCarthy and the reviews will be decidely mixed. Goalkeeping is a strange position, just ask De Gea, Bosnich, Taibi and Tim Howard- all of whom had big reputations before wobbling at Old Trafford. Federici had a wobble, that is all!
So please, can we get some perspective and try to stop being so fickle, hypocritical and sanctimonious?
by Mr Angry » 09 Oct 2012 11:23
by PistolPete » 09 Oct 2012 11:29
by LoyalRoyalFan » 09 Oct 2012 11:32
PistolPete Reading fans, you embarrass me.
There is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have. It was an ideal game for McCarthy in that he was able to look good; keepers dream of games like that. In fact, had McCarthy not got lucky with the post on either of those saves they would have been errors (I genuinely think that both Luke Moore's header and Ki Sung Yeung's long range shot should have been comfortably pushed around the post). Don't get me wrong, McCarthy is a good keeper, but he's been shaky so far - 31st minute vs Tottenham anyone? People who say McCarthy made 'worldy' saves against Swansea need to get their eyes checked.
It was however fair and correct that Federici was dropped, he deserved to be with his two errors costing us up to 5 points. But let's not chastise one of Federici's greatest character traits, his ambition. The same ambition that caused his 'disgraceful' come-and-get-me pleas to the premiership and of course him taking the dropping so badly. But his ambition isn't all bad, we were shown early signs of this ambition when he riskily left Australia without a club, begging clubs like Wolves and Leeds to give him a trial. It's the same ambition that has led him to work hard enough to gain a full time contract at Reading and national caps for Australia despite not having the backing of a great youth set up like many top pros. Come on, honestly, who here wouldn't have wanted a move to the premiership if they weren't a Reading fan? Anyone who say's they wouldn't is either unambitious or a lier.
But again to the question of whether Federici is a worse keeper than McCarthy all of a sudden? No, in my opinion. Could McCarthy become better than Federici? Perhaps. However, ask Ipswich fans what they think of McCarthy and the reviews will be decidely mixed. Goalkeeping is a strange position, just ask De Gea, Bosnich, Taibi and Tim Howard- all of whom had big reputations before wobbling at Old Trafford. Federici had a wobble, that is all!
So please, can we get some perspective and try to stop being so fickle, hypocritical and sanctimonious?
by Ian Royal » 09 Oct 2012 11:56
Stuboo Hahahaha. Nice one Big Foot. I'm seriously struggling to think of a single redeeming feature of Warnock though.
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 Oct 2012 12:42
by Royal Lady » 09 Oct 2012 13:18
by SWLR » 09 Oct 2012 13:33
by Stuboo » 09 Oct 2012 14:06
Ian RoyalStuboo Hahahaha. Nice one Big Foot. I'm seriously struggling to think of a single redeeming feature of Warnock though.
Frequently loses to Reading. Acts as a pantomime villain for Reading fans to create a good atmosphere in games involving him.
by Stuboo » 09 Oct 2012 14:09
PistolPete Reading fans, you embarrass me.
There is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have. It was an ideal game for McCarthy in that he was able to look good; keepers dream of games like that. In fact, had McCarthy not got lucky with the post on either of those saves they would have been errors (I genuinely think that both Luke Moore's header and Ki Sung Yeung's long range shot should have been comfortably pushed around the post). Don't get me wrong, McCarthy is a good keeper, but he's been shaky so far - 31st minute vs Tottenham anyone? People who say McCarthy made 'worldy' saves against Swansea need to get their eyes checked.
It was however fair and correct that Federici was dropped, he deserved to be with his two errors costing us up to 5 points. But let's not chastise one of Federici's greatest character traits, his ambition. The same ambition that caused his 'disgraceful' come-and-get-me pleas to the premiership and of course him taking the dropping so badly. But his ambition isn't all bad, we were shown early signs of this ambition when he riskily left Australia without a club, begging clubs like Wolves and Leeds to give him a trial. It's the same ambition that has led him to work hard enough to gain a full time contract at Reading and national caps for Australia despite not having the backing of a great youth set up like many top pros. Come on, honestly, who here wouldn't have wanted a move to the premiership if they weren't a Reading fan? Anyone who say's they wouldn't is either unambitious or a lier.
But again to the question of whether Federici is a worse keeper than McCarthy all of a sudden? No, in my opinion. Could McCarthy become better than Federici? Perhaps. However, ask Ipswich fans what they think of McCarthy and the reviews will be decidely mixed. Goalkeeping is a strange position, just ask De Gea, Bosnich, Taibi and Tim Howard- all of whom had big reputations before wobbling at Old Trafford. Federici had a wobble, that is all!
So please, can we get some perspective and try to stop being so fickle, hypocritical and sanctimonious?
by Big Foot » 09 Oct 2012 14:13
by Maguire » 09 Oct 2012 14:14
by PistolPete » 09 Oct 2012 14:19
StubooPistolPete Reading fans, you embarrass me.
There is not a single save that McCarthy made on Saturday that Federici wouldn't have. It was an ideal game for McCarthy in that he was able to look good; keepers dream of games like that. In fact, had McCarthy not got lucky with the post on either of those saves they would have been errors (I genuinely think that both Luke Moore's header and Ki Sung Yeung's long range shot should have been comfortably pushed around the post). Don't get me wrong, McCarthy is a good keeper, but he's been shaky so far - 31st minute vs Tottenham anyone? People who say McCarthy made 'worldy' saves against Swansea need to get their eyes checked.
It was however fair and correct that Federici was dropped, he deserved to be with his two errors costing us up to 5 points. But let's not chastise one of Federici's greatest character traits, his ambition. The same ambition that caused his 'disgraceful' come-and-get-me pleas to the premiership and of course him taking the dropping so badly. But his ambition isn't all bad, we were shown early signs of this ambition when he riskily left Australia without a club, begging clubs like Wolves and Leeds to give him a trial. It's the same ambition that has led him to work hard enough to gain a full time contract at Reading and national caps for Australia despite not having the backing of a great youth set up like many top pros. Come on, honestly, who here wouldn't have wanted a move to the premiership if they weren't a Reading fan? Anyone who say's they wouldn't is either unambitious or a lier.
But again to the question of whether Federici is a worse keeper than McCarthy all of a sudden? No, in my opinion. Could McCarthy become better than Federici? Perhaps. However, ask Ipswich fans what they think of McCarthy and the reviews will be decidely mixed. Goalkeeping is a strange position, just ask De Gea, Bosnich, Taibi and Tim Howard- all of whom had big reputations before wobbling at Old Trafford. Federici had a wobble, that is all!
So please, can we get some perspective and try to stop being so fickle, hypocritical and sanctimonious?
I generally agree with you, that we can't say McCarthy is better than Federici, and that the hate for Federici is ridiculous. A lot of "haters" around. Is it because Federici has an ego which is why he is so disliked? I genuinely don't get it.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 09 Oct 2012 14:21
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 Oct 2012 14:22
Maguire
I'm a little perplexed that Fed has managed to play himself out of the side as I genuinely, genuinely thought he'd be the one player who'd be fine in the Premiership.
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Carnabyswhiskers, Google [Bot] and 325 guests