by Royalclapper » 29 Oct 2012 10:26
by Snowball » 29 Oct 2012 10:26
Schards#2 It's not a mountain out of a molehill when our centre midfield options are reduced to
Leigitwood, Tabb, Mcanuff, Gunarsson
That is nowhere near adequate in this division.
by Simon's Church » 29 Oct 2012 10:29
SnowballSchards#2 It's not a mountain out of a molehill when our centre midfield options are reduced to
Leigitwood, Tabb, Mcanuff, Gunarsson
That is nowhere near adequate in this division.
Our last three results (leaving out Liverpool as Guthrie played)
seem to suggest we CAN compete
2-2 Draw Karacan-Elwood with Newcastle, lost to a hand-ball goal
2-2 Draw Karacan-Tabb away to Swansea
3-3 Draw Tabb-Elwood with Fulham.
Also McCleary can play behind the striker in 4-5-1
by Snowball » 29 Oct 2012 10:30
by ZacNaloen » 29 Oct 2012 10:32
by Royal Lady » 29 Oct 2012 10:36
by Schards#2 » 29 Oct 2012 10:39
Snowball Point is Tabb started twice and we got two good draws against decent teams
by Snowball » 29 Oct 2012 10:41
Schards#2Snowball Point is Tabb started twice and we got two good draws against decent teams
We were outplayed in both games by sides that may well not finish in the top half. I like Tabb, he give 100% and has made the absolute maximum of his talents, which is admirable.
He is, however, not good enough at this level and no amount of stats will change that.
by Cypry » 29 Oct 2012 10:43
Royal LadyCyprySchards#2 It's not a mountain out of a molehill when our centre midfield options are reduced to
Leigitwood
Tabb
Mcanuff
Gunarsson
That is nowhere near adequate in this division.
The question was why Guthrie wasn't in the squad on Saturday....that's the molehill that Dellor was trying to have a dig around...
I'm sure there are some issues around Guthrie (his little outburst on Twitter more than hints at that) - Brian is probably, quite rightly so, trying to keep a lid on it, and probably sees it as unhelpful when "the press" keep picking at the wound...that could explain why he sounded pissed off couldn't it?
I suspect Brian is more than aware that we're lacking in midfield personnel with Jem out for a bit, and the last thing he wants is the press agitating any situation which surrounds Guthrie any further. I'm sure nobody more than Brian would like to have him featuring as a starting player...problem is, look at his performance against Liverpool - in a situation where we desperately need a win, would you be prepared to take a gamble on a player coming good, where recently he's been unable to produce the goods?
My problem here is how polarised peoples views are, and how many seem to want to knock Brian at every opportunity.....
That's a bit of a generalisation. I stated only yesterday that I love Brian and what he has done for the club, in the same way I loved Coppell - but we can't just ignore that everything is going wrong - It really does seem that McD is increasingly out of his depth - I don't know whether a remedy would be bringing in another coach to help him out or what, but we need to do something, as he seems to have lost his way.
by RoyalBlue » 29 Oct 2012 10:50
SnowballSchards#2Snowball Point is Tabb started twice and we got two good draws against decent teams
We were outplayed in both games by sides that may well not finish in the top half. I like Tabb, he give 100% and has made the absolute maximum of his talents, which is admirable.
He is, however, not good enough at this level and no amount of stats will change that.
Daft. If he starts ten and we W1 D9?
by ZacNaloen » 29 Oct 2012 10:52
Cypry
From my point of view, we were well on top of the game for the first half against Fulham, and it was only our failure to react to the changes caused by the introduction of Ruiz, that let Fulham get a foothold back in the game (really don't get this view that somehow Fulham "outplayed" us - I must've been watching a different game to those who think so). IMO this is a great improvement,and if we can take the momentum from the last 10 minutes into the game against QPR, then I can sense our first win coming up.....
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:01
Royal91 Brilliant so the only player that can pass has now had a bust up. If I were Guthrie and the manager kept putting a second rate winger in CM and taking me off I would be pissed off!
Not only that he sees Tabb lining up in front of him. McDermott has to realise this is a results business not lets play a shit player because he's a nice guy.
by bracksroyal10 » 29 Oct 2012 11:05
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:06
LoyalRoyalFanleon
Guthrie has done nothing so far to be able to demand he's in the first team.
Please tell me what 70% of our squad have done to be able to cement a place in the first team?
by Tails » 29 Oct 2012 11:08
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:08
My point though is that McDermott shouldn't have let it get to this point. Either he should have managed Guthrie's expectations when he first signed, adapted the system to accommodate his style, or signed a player more suited to how we're playing now. I think it's been a poor piece of man management and I worry about his ability to motivate those who aren't just honest championship triers.
by RoyalBlue » 29 Oct 2012 11:12
melonheadMy point though is that McDermott shouldn't have let it get to this point. Either he should have managed Guthrie's expectations when he first signed, adapted the system to accommodate his style, or signed a player more suited to how we're playing now. I think it's been a poor piece of man management and I worry about his ability to motivate those who aren't just honest championship triers.
i think we did try to accomodate guthire, and change our style to fit his, in the first few games.
the trouble is hes not good enough to build a side around, and not worth changing our style just to suit him.
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:12
Royal Lady And personally, I think it shows Guthrie cares about wanting to play - he could sit on his arse and just collect his over inflated pay packet - but he's not happy doing that and as I said on another thread, McD is cutting off his nose to spite his face at the moment - playing Tabb when he could be playing Guthrie is one of the strangest decisions McD has made imo.
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:14
Royal Lady Anyone who doesn't believe it, after hearing McD's interview after the game, is an idiot imo.
Quite clearly, there is a problem. Guthrie wasn't even on the bench. He has clearly been told to adapt his style of play to the way that McD wants him to play, as Guthrie himself tweeted a few weeks ago. If he's moaned about it to McD or anyone else, I don't blame him. It's the way he may have gone about it that may be questionable. If he's ranted and raved and sworn to McD, then McD needs to reel him in.
by Snowball » 29 Oct 2012 11:15
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests