BraisingsteakRoyal It's mid-table championship quality football (at best) in the long term. .
i think our record over the last 7 years plying in that exact way says something slightly different
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:16
BraisingsteakRoyal It's mid-table championship quality football (at best) in the long term. .
by Alexander Litvinenko » 29 Oct 2012 11:20
by Archie's penalty » 29 Oct 2012 11:20
Far CanalBraisingsteakRoyal The Reading way is hustle and bustle, championship standard wing play, percentage set pieces and resorting to hoofball when nothing else is working.
Stoke haven't done too bad on it.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/newcastl ... -32120444/
There is a quite good assessment of Guthrie and the team here:
http://www.tiktaka.com/reading/guthrie- ... -survival/
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:26
ZacNaloenCypry
From my point of view, we were well on top of the game for the first half against Fulham, and it was only our failure to react to the changes caused by the introduction of Ruiz, that let Fulham get a foothold back in the game (really don't get this view that somehow Fulham "outplayed" us - I must've been watching a different game to those who think so). IMO this is a great improvement,and if we can take the momentum from the last 10 minutes into the game against QPR, then I can sense our first win coming up.....
Fulham outplayed us for the 5 minutes after Ruiz came on as we didn't get a grip on him at all, before that we were bang on top, and after that it was very even.
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:30
bracksroyal10 My point is surely you can understand Guthrie's frustration at the situation,
im pretty sure AZ and BMD would of given him guaranteed first team football or some form of guarantee otherwise there is no way he would of joined us.
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:33
Tails Why sign him in the first place, the club and manager new what they were getting when they signed him....a player that isn't 'direct' and can be volatile.
by Hoop Blah » 29 Oct 2012 11:34
by West Stand Man » 29 Oct 2012 11:36
Royal Lady I don't like to knock Tabb - he runs ragged and he never gives up, but surely you can all admit he's not a Premier League standard player? It's not his fault - and I expect his relishing having the chance to play at the moment, but we need someone better - whether that's Guthrie or not, we need someone stronger in midfield.
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:38
It really does seem that McD is increasingly out of his depth
he seems to have lost his way.
West Stand ManRoyal Lady I don't like to knock Tabb - he runs ragged and he never gives up, but surely you can all admit he's not a Premier League standard player? It's not his fault - and I expect his relishing having the chance to play at the moment, but we need someone better - whether that's Guthrie or not, we need someone stronger in midfield.
Go on then, humour me. What is the definition of a Pl standard player if it isn't one who can play well at PL level?
by West Stand Man » 29 Oct 2012 11:40
LacosteWest Stand Man Go on then, humour me. What is the definition of a Pl standard player if it isn't one who can play well at PL level?
Come on be honest, any manager who thinks that going into a prem season with Tabb, Leg, Gunnarson, Karacan and a Guthrie who doesn't suit our style (apparently) is sufficient deserves everything he gets.
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:41
RoyalBluemelonheadMy point though is that McDermott shouldn't have let it get to this point. Either he should have managed Guthrie's expectations when he first signed, adapted the system to accommodate his style, or signed a player more suited to how we're playing now. I think it's been a poor piece of man management and I worry about his ability to motivate those who aren't just honest championship triers.
i think we did try to accomodate guthire, and change our style to fit his, in the first few games.
the trouble is hes not good enough to build a side around, and not worth changing our style just to suit him.
So a wasted/wrong signing then.
Funny how so many people (I'm not saying you were one) were celebrating his signing but are now saying we are better off without him.
by facaldaqui » 29 Oct 2012 11:43
Royal Lady It really does seem that McD is increasingly out of his depth - I don't know whether a remedy would be bringing in another coach to help him out or what, but we need to do something, as he seems to have lost his way.
by under the tin » 29 Oct 2012 11:46
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:47
Archie's penaltyFar CanalBraisingsteakRoyal The Reading way is hustle and bustle, championship standard wing play, percentage set pieces and resorting to hoofball when nothing else is working.
Stoke haven't done too bad on it.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/newcastl ... -32120444/
There is a quite good assessment of Guthrie and the team here:
http://www.tiktaka.com/reading/guthrie- ... -survival/
I really like the piece on Guthrie, great analysis.
by Schards#2 » 29 Oct 2012 11:47
melonheadRoyal Lady And personally, I think it shows Guthrie cares about wanting to play - he could sit on his arse and just collect his over inflated pay packet - but he's not happy doing that and as I said on another thread, McD is cutting off his nose to spite his face at the moment - playing Tabb when he could be playing Guthrie is one of the strangest decisions McD has made imo.
not strange at all when you see the way the team looks with either player in the middle.
tabb played very well on saturday, and fit into the teams style: stoke and chelsea ganmes aside, guthrie hasnt played well, constantly gives the ball away, doesnt track back or work hard, constantly moans and whinges during th egame at the players, and after the game on twitter to the manager.
yes its god that he cares- you wouldnt expect anyone to be happy at being dropped. but brian isnt in the habit of being a dictator manager, and strict disciplinarian. if hes felt the need to banish guthrie from training, its because guthrie has stepped beyond the bounds of respectful conduct.
by Snowball » 29 Oct 2012 11:49
by melonhead » 29 Oct 2012 11:50
Hoop Blah I don't think McDermott made a change to nulify Fulham's introduction of Ruiz, he made a change because Tabb was blowing out of his arse.
As for Guthrie, it will be interesting to see how this pans out and where the truth in the story actually lies.
As I've said before, signing him to then play him in a different position and/or ask him to play differently to how he's made his name and is capable of seems really odd. He isn't a Sigurdsson number 10 type player. He's more of a more creative type Harper or Premier League Brian Howard from what I've seen of him before, that's why he was understudy to Cabeye at Newcastle. Putting him in our team to play behind the lone forward just didn't make a lot of sense.
.
by Geekins » 29 Oct 2012 11:53
by Mr.T10 » 29 Oct 2012 11:54
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 291 guests