by facaldaqui » 05 Nov 2012 10:42
by maffff » 05 Nov 2012 10:46
by ZacNaloen » 05 Nov 2012 10:47
by Snowball » 05 Nov 2012 10:48
facaldaqui MOTD2 was interesting. Tabb, Leigertwood, Roberts, and McCarthy picked out. Tabb and Roberts not so much on here. All we can do is moan that the midfield ran out of steam (leading to conceding one goal).
To be honest the ballwinning of Tabb and Leigertwood was pretty uncanny most of the time. I really want a Guthrie-type creative presence, but it's like putting an engine on a rowing boat while pulling a plank out.
And who thought Lorro would ever be more positive than Reading fans? He said if we kept our present team efforts going we will start winning. Good point, but can't he be bothered to have a shave to go on telly?
by ZacNaloen » 05 Nov 2012 10:49
by facaldaqui » 05 Nov 2012 10:52
Snowballfacaldaqui MOTD2 was interesting. Tabb, Leigertwood, Roberts, and McCarthy picked out. Tabb and Roberts not so much on here. All we can do is moan that the midfield ran out of steam (leading to conceding one goal).
To be honest the ballwinning of Tabb and Leigertwood was pretty uncanny most of the time. I really want a Guthrie-type creative presence, but it's like putting an engine on a rowing boat while pulling a plank out.
And who thought Lorro would ever be more positive than Reading fans? He said if we kept our present team efforts going we will start winning. Good point, but can't he be bothered to have a shave to go on telly?
Thought Roberts was EXCELLENT up front and far better than Pog at holding up the ball, giving us a breather.
When fit he'd be on my team-sheet every time
Hunt looked a bit off colour and trying Pog for him might've helped
by winchester_royal » 05 Nov 2012 11:19
ZacNaloen Hunt looks completely and utterly knackered after 65 minutes. No idea why he wasn't subbed over Roberts who tbf still looked fresh.
by melonhead » 05 Nov 2012 11:22
southbank1871 I find myself in agreement with Brendy here. There were some ridiculous overreactions after the Arsenal game, claiming that there was no way back for Brian and this team. Yet we came out today and dominated QPR for he first half and we had chances to win it even after they'd equalised. I actually thought our ball retention wasn't bad today, but we did allow players such as Taraabt far too much time on the ball.
A win would have been great, but a point away at QPR isn't too bad at all. It will be our results at home that ultimately decide whether we stay up or not, we absolutely have to start winning at home.
Assuming no injuries, I would go with the same starting XI against Norwich.
by Simon's Church » 05 Nov 2012 11:26
melonheadsouthbank1871 I find myself in agreement with Brendy here. There were some ridiculous overreactions after the Arsenal game, claiming that there was no way back for Brian and this team. Yet we came out today and dominated QPR for he first half and we had chances to win it even after they'd equalised. I actually thought our ball retention wasn't bad today, but we did allow players such as Taraabt far too much time on the ball.
A win would have been great, but a point away at QPR isn't too bad at all. It will be our results at home that ultimately decide whether we stay up or not, we absolutely have to start winning at home.
Assuming no injuries, I would go with the same starting XI against Norwich.
agree about our ball retention- at about the half hour mark the possession was 65-35 in our favour
by melonhead » 05 Nov 2012 11:27
Mr Angry At times yesterday we were totally out-played, and everytime in the second half that the Rangers midfield got the ball, my heart was in my mouth, yet we still looked dangerous when we went forward and had the final pass been better or a shot been on target (Kebe!) then we might have nicked all 3 points.
We give the ball away far too cheaply and in dangerous positions, and that is something that has to be worked on constantly on the training pitches at Hogwood to be eradicated or at least massively reduced, because we just end up putting ourselves under so much pressure, and defend deeper and deeper that an opposition chance on goal is inevitable.
The only criticism of Brian I have got is that I would have brought the Pog on for Roberts at some point as the Rangers defence looked all at sea if the ball was crossed into the box, and had a panicky feel about it that the Pog might have been able to exploit; also, how many offsides does Roberts get a game???
by melonhead » 05 Nov 2012 11:29
Simon's Churchmelonheadsouthbank1871 I find myself in agreement with Brendy here. There were some ridiculous overreactions after the Arsenal game, claiming that there was no way back for Brian and this team. Yet we came out today and dominated QPR for he first half and we had chances to win it even after they'd equalised. I actually thought our ball retention wasn't bad today, but we did allow players such as Taraabt far too much time on the ball.
A win would have been great, but a point away at QPR isn't too bad at all. It will be our results at home that ultimately decide whether we stay up or not, we absolutely have to start winning at home.
Assuming no injuries, I would go with the same starting XI against Norwich.
agree about our ball retention- at about the half hour mark the possession was 65-35 in our favour
Yeah but for whatever reason it kind of went to shit after that.
by bennno » 05 Nov 2012 11:38
Simon's Churchmelonheadsouthbank1871 I find myself in agreement with Brendy here. There were some ridiculous overreactions after the Arsenal game, claiming that there was no way back for Brian and this team. Yet we came out today and dominated QPR for he first half and we had chances to win it even after they'd equalised. I actually thought our ball retention wasn't bad today, but we did allow players such as Taraabt far too much time on the ball.
A win would have been great, but a point away at QPR isn't too bad at all. It will be our results at home that ultimately decide whether we stay up or not, we absolutely have to start winning at home.
Assuming no injuries, I would go with the same starting XI against Norwich.
agree about our ball retention- at about the half hour mark the possession was 65-35 in our favour
Yeah but for whatever reason it kind of went to shit after that.
by pea » 05 Nov 2012 12:38
by SydenhamRoyal » 05 Nov 2012 12:41
by ZacNaloen » 05 Nov 2012 12:49
by melonhead » 05 Nov 2012 12:52
by ZacNaloen » 05 Nov 2012 12:56
by RoyalBlue » 05 Nov 2012 13:07
SydenhamRoyal .
Agree with this. Ledge in particular looked absolutely knackered from about 60 minutes, and don't forget most of them lot played 128 minutes during the week
by maffff » 05 Nov 2012 13:11
Patrick Barclay: Brilliance of Cisse should offer hope for QPR
By now Mark Hughes, near-disconsolate after Queens Park Rangers’ home draw with Reading yesterday, may have had another look at his team’s performance, in which case he should be feeling more hopeful.
Despite the letting slip of another two points, Rangers emphasised they have enough quality to start reducing the gap between themselves, Reading and Southampton — an all too plausible bottom three — and the clubs above, who surprisingly include Stoke City, Saturday’s opponents at the Britannia Stadium.
There is a midweek visit to Sunderland towards the end of the month and Aston Villa are due at Loftus Road only days later. These are key matches in the mini-league in which Rangers reluctantly feature — and they do have the scoring potential to emerge with the beginnings of a revival.
Djibril Cisse embodies it. There are times when you wonder if the former Liverpool striker ought to spend less time designing his appearance and more on improving his game but the Lord of the Manor of Frodsham — a title he acquired upon buying property in the Cheshire village of that name — performed with the right kind of swagger yesterday.
He was a class above the surrounding defenders in scoring the equaliser and the long-range shot that had Rangers fans prematurely celebrating a winner had a touch of majesty, even if Reading’s outstanding young goalkeeper Alex McCarthy seemed to have it covered. Cisse contrived a classy cross for Bobby Zamora too — only for the former Fulham striker to display what you might call the common touch in front of goal.
All in all, Cisse looked just the sort of player you want in a crisis. Which was exactly what he wasn’t last season, when the Frenchman scored six goals in eight matches but was too often unavailable because of two red cards. Now that he has learned how to stay on the field, the goals should start coming and, if yesterday’s proves the first of a run, even old curmudgeons like me will not mind how he has his scalp and chops styled.
Other reasons for Rangers to be more cheerful than Hughes appeared after the match include Junior Hoilett and, if the exciting presence of Adel Taarabt makes you wonder if there is a bit too much individualism in the ranks, the diligent professionalism exemplified by Esteban Granero, for all his skills, and Ryan Nelsen offers reassurance.
Rangers just need that elusive first win and, if it comes at Stoke, there will be optimism in the air when Southampton come to west London on Saturday week. It’s nicely set up for Cisse. Maybe he should keep yesterday’s barnet — in appropriate blue — as a lucky charm.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Wisconsin Royal and 183 guests