Playing on the same side? The last taboo

[melonhead]

I want to be on board with this but I keep letting my self down everytime I read the name "Dick Advocaat", can't suppress the snigger

are you a dick advocate?

[Ian Royal]

IN!

Baggsies not the roastee.

[westongeezer]

This forum sholud be be posted in hardback......ohhhhhh no more innuendo .......you could'nt dream up the tangents this runs off in....

[Question Mark]

Haven't read the whole thread but Surely Godwins law has been proven?!?!

[harryroyal]

the lady doth protest too much

[pace=forster]

I think what harryroyal is trying to say is that the seige is a oxf*rd moron, fishing trip or not

[leon]

I think what harryroyal is trying to say is that the seige is a oxf*rd moron, fishing trip or not

no, I think he's saying he's gay

[AthleticoSpizz]

^ no substitute for experience

[East End Lady]

Isn't it great when the people who oppose your view manage to prove it! So Gays are Gays because they could'nt conceive of making love to a person of the opposite sex. Of course, should they wish to have children for their own reasons (who cares about the children then produced - they are just fashion accessories), they can suddenly change their sexuality! Would any Heterosexual accept buggery to have a child - I seriously think not!

You've spouted some nonsense on this thread most of which I've just ignored, but really "fashion accessories". Just because their sexual preference is not what you consider normal does not mean that the biological calling to procreate isn't there. The majority of gy couples will have done far more soul searching and thought into the idea of becoming parents than most heterosexuals.

And by the way I could not have kids and if buggery had been the answer it would have been a small price to pay.

[Platypuss]

If TheSieve thinks he's an example of "normality" then I'd rather be gay.

[USA_Loyal_Royal]

If TheSieve thinks he's an example of "normality" then I'd rather be gay.

i second this...

[If you still hate Futcher]

MILLIONS of gay people have children.

Gay men marry straight women, manage to have babies.

Gay women marry straight men and manage to make babies.

Sometimes gay men marry gay women and manage to make babies.

And try researching "egg-cup love"

I think you are right Snowball! That is how Aids became a heterosexual problem in England.

What with that and the bit about homosexuality being a disease from a few pages back he's got to be fishing - no-one's that bigoted/ignorant nowadays are they

[Ian Royal]

If TheSieve thinks he's an example of "normality" then I'd rather be gay.

I'd rather be dead. Being gay would mean I'd still have to share a world with all the TheSieges

[Snowball]

What with that and the bit about homosexuality being a disease from a few pages back he's got to be fishing - no-one's that bigoted/ignorant nowadays are they

I think he is. Bigoted and rabid, that is.

[harryroyal]

If TheSieve thinks he's an example of "normality" then I'd rather be gay.

i second this...

i 3rd this.

[Man Friday]

I've cracked it! The Siege is really gay. He's just trying to hide it. Spot of self-loathing. Very common. There's nothing wrong with being gay. Just go with your feelings is my advice to him.

[Franchise FC]

I’ve no idea if this is an elaborate wind-up, but on the basis that it’s not…

- As you say it is very much the ‘last taboo’ in football and indeed most professional sport.
- The initiative to take place next summer is very welcome, I hope it has legs and comes to fruition.
- Such a revelation would not in any way affect my supporting of RFC, in fact I’d be proud that my club was at the forefront of such a campaign.

Surely, he's not

[Elm Park Pasty]

I think you are right Snowball! That is how Aids became a heterosexual problem in England. Now tell me, if a women is Gay, why should she marry a straight man? If a Man is a Homosexual, why on earth would he marry a woman - all of these show exactly what I am saying. The children are produced as sops to people who want to pretend they are Normal when, by definition, they are not. The children should all be taken into care!

How many male/male or female/female relationships have produced children naturally - Oh! That would be none then!

I have no delusions myself of being totally equality minded, but you absolutely stagger me you really do. You are spouting views that are beginning to verge (if they haven't already!) on being bloody offensive. Remove children into care if their parents are gay? Fashion accessories? Seriously, do you believe the s*** you are shovelling? I would quite probably make the same argument for children brought up in bigoted households with extreme views, after all hate begats hate and all that. Quite frankly your view of sexuality is probably best suited to some third world country that thinks homosexuality is a curse for something done in a previous life. I really am bemused

[maffff]

Reading recent posts from TheSiege on here.



That is all.

[Elm Park Pasty]

As I haven't lived or been back to Reading for a number of years, can someone please refresh my memory as to exactly which suburb is like Salem? I can't help but think that if TheSiege is living there then they probably don't appreciate 'them gays', and that every few nights on the green there is a nice bonfire of people who they think are subversive/not 'normal' (penny for the gay anyone?). Not to mention the collection of children from the undesirables to be shared out among those that have the 'right' view of the world. Christ (oops, Siegey can I mention his name in vain???), I'm only glad we don't lock people we don't like in nuthouses anymore, they would be more overcrowded than prisons if he had his way.