by melonhead »
30 Nov 2012 15:55
grey_squirrel melonhead grey_squirrel Agree with both Vision's posts.
But, it still gnarls me that McD spunked what money he got (largely) on players no better than what we already had. I suspect this is also the main angst amongst supporters - rather than the perceived lack of splashing the cash.
to get players better than we had wed have had to spend double the money
we only had a ten million budget for fees and wages and had 6 positions that 100% needed filling.
shoreys better than we had. gunters better cover at RB than we had(bryn/karacan).mariappa is better cover than we had(bryn).mcleary is better cover than we had(no one)guthrie is a better ball player than any of our other three midfielders, and even now pog is still a better 4th choice striker than church.
I take it that was all tongue in cheek.
£10M (or what the hell ever) for just better cover! Indeed.
shorey who is the best player on the park every week.
mcleary looks as good as kebe imo, once kebes inconsistency and injury proneness is taken into account, every one says guthrie is better than any of our CMs,
marriappa looked better than gorkss on tuesday and when hes played previously
gunter is equal to cummings.
scoff all you like, its not even having better cover, its actually having any at all.
you cant go into a season with ian harte as your only LB, cummings as your only RB, kebe as your only RW, only two CBs,only three CMs, and only three decent enough strikers.
covering those as well as we have within that 10 million budget for fees and wages is pretty oxf*rd amazing tbf
even if it proves not quite enough.