by Royalwaster » 03 Dec 2012 09:31
moonwalklikebas No manager would have got more out of that group of players today. For fcuking sake we gave one of the best teams in the world a very close run. Back the boys, back the manager. Today was a great performance!!
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Dec 2012 12:25
by maffff » 04 Dec 2012 12:29
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Dec 2012 12:34
by maffff » 04 Dec 2012 12:35
by noelgallagher » 04 Dec 2012 12:40
maffff If McD had been managing Man U would have have madea tactical change in bringing Rafael off that early on? I doubt it. That change pretty much won them the game.
by M Brook » 04 Dec 2012 12:47
maffff If McD had been managing Man U would have have madea tactical change in bringing Rafael off that early on? I doubt it. That change pretty much won them the game.
by maffff » 04 Dec 2012 12:50
M Brookmaffff If McD had been managing Man U would have have madea tactical change in bringing Rafael off that early on? I doubt it. That change pretty much won them the game.
He brought him off before he got sent off!
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Dec 2012 12:57
by winchester_royal » 04 Dec 2012 13:01
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Dec 2012 13:29
winchester_royal Substitutions also rely on the quality of players you're taking off though.
Yes United have better subs, but they have better players on the pitch to start with too.
I'm with Maffff, there's no way Mcd would ever haul a player off like that.
by If you still hate Futcher » 04 Dec 2012 13:46
winchester_royal Substitutions also rely on the quality of players you're taking off though.
Yes United have better subs, but they have better players on the pitch to start with too.
I'm with Maffff, there's no way Mcd would ever haul a player off like that.
by cmonurz » 04 Dec 2012 13:46
maffff Hence the 'If McDermott had been the manager of Man U...'
It's just not his style. He's been making subs 15-20 minutes too late most of this season it feels. Waits until momentum is lost / we've gone behind. Very much reactionary as opposed to trying to seize the initative.
by winchester_royal » 04 Dec 2012 13:50
Extended-Phenotypewinchester_royal Substitutions also rely on the quality of players you're taking off though.
Yes United have better subs, but they have better players on the pitch to start with too.
I'm with Maffff, there's no way Mcd would ever haul a player off like that.
How do you know, though?
Lacking any kind of evidence (i.e. Brian being in a similar situation) I don't understand what the speculation is based on. It's like saying a vegitarian wouldn't like the taste of bacon.
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Dec 2012 14:32
winchester_royalExtended-Phenotypewinchester_royal Substitutions also rely on the quality of players you're taking off though.
Yes United have better subs, but they have better players on the pitch to start with too.
I'm with Maffff, there's no way Mcd would ever haul a player off like that.
How do you know, though?
Lacking any kind of evidence (i.e. Brian being in a similar situation) I don't understand what the speculation is based on. It's like saying a vegitarian wouldn't like the taste of bacon.
I don't think we lack evidence at all.
A number of times players have had shockers in the first half, or have picked up early bookings, or the system's looked wrong..and no early change has taken place.
by melonhead » 04 Dec 2012 14:40
by akranes » 04 Dec 2012 14:46
melonhead i can say with some certainty that brian would have taken off a full back if hed been booked and was being roasted time and again by a winger, no matter when in the game
by Royal Rother » 04 Dec 2012 14:57
Users browsing this forum: BarryWhiteRFC, Clyde1998, From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Horsham Royal, Sutekh and 269 guests