by cmonurz » 04 Dec 2012 14:59
by melonhead » 04 Dec 2012 15:50
by melonhead » 04 Dec 2012 15:50
akranesmelonhead i can say with some certainty that brian would have taken off a full back if hed been booked and was being roasted time and again by a winger, no matter when in the game
lol
i doubt that
by Hoop Blah » 04 Dec 2012 15:53
by Ian Royal » 04 Dec 2012 17:34
Extended-Phenotypewinchester_royal Substitutions also rely on the quality of players you're taking off though.
Yes United have better subs, but they have better players on the pitch to start with too.
I'm with Maffff, there's no way Mcd would ever haul a player off like that.
How do you know, though?
Lacking any kind of evidence (i.e. Brian being in a similar situation) I don't understand what the speculation is based on. It's like saying a vegitarian wouldn't like the taste of bacon.
by melonhead » 05 Dec 2012 10:20
by Divvy » 05 Dec 2012 12:00
melonhead no theyre not
by cmonurz » 05 Dec 2012 12:03
Divvy BM doesn't like to upset the players.
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 05 Dec 2012 12:08
melonhead i can say with some certainty that brian would have taken off a full back if hed been booked and was being roasted time and again by a winger, no matter when in the game
by Divvy » 05 Dec 2012 12:19
cmonurzDivvy BM doesn't like to upset the players.
Not playing Guthrie because he passes it too much?
Not playing Pearce because he won't sign a new contract?
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Dec 2012 13:29
Ian RoyalExtended-Phenotypewinchester_royal Substitutions also rely on the quality of players you're taking off though.
Yes United have better subs, but they have better players on the pitch to start with too.
I'm with Maffff, there's no way Mcd would ever haul a player off like that.
How do you know, though?
Lacking any kind of evidence (i.e. Brian being in a similar situation) I don't understand what the speculation is based on. It's like saying a vegitarian wouldn't like the taste of bacon.
He's been in similar situations. We've had players all over the shop from the kick off in the past and he's not made an early sub. The only time he'll do it is if there's an injury and he has to.
Mafff and winch are spot on.
by Get Carter » 05 Dec 2012 14:15
by melonhead » 05 Dec 2012 14:39
Divvymelonhead no theyre not
Yes they are. Prove otherwise? BM doesn't like to upset the players. He's too nice, and it's one of his biggest downfalls IMO.
by melonhead » 05 Dec 2012 14:40
cmonurzDivvy BM doesn't like to upset the players.
Not playing Guthrie because he passes it too much?
Not playing Pearce because he won't sign a new contract?
by melonhead » 05 Dec 2012 14:41
beat him with a sock filled with nothing but fantasy
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Dec 2012 14:49
by TBM » 05 Dec 2012 15:08
Extended-Phenotype For a decent stab at 4-5-1 he's going to need Guthrie or Jem back in the mix.
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Dec 2012 15:11
by TBM » 05 Dec 2012 15:35
Extended-Phenotype Be tempted to play a striker in a wide position; go two up front when in posession.
But that's a bit Football Manager.
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Dec 2012 15:37
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], katweslowski and 164 guests