Daniel Carrico

185 posts
User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Ian Royal » 10 Feb 2013 22:08

Royal Ginger If McD insists on playing Jobi in the middle I can't see how Carrico will get a look in. Looks like we've got too many CMs now. Imagine if we'd got Sig too...

They perform totally different roles. Carrico is competing with Legs.

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7206
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Royal Ginger » 10 Feb 2013 23:39

Ian Royal
Royal Ginger If McD insists on playing Jobi in the middle I can't see how Carrico will get a look in. Looks like we've got too many CMs now. Imagine if we'd got Sig too...

They perform totally different roles. Carrico is competing with Legs.


Fair point, perhaps it's not Carrico that's on shaky ground, but someone's going to miss out. There's not enough room in the team/on the bench.

User avatar
Ouroboros
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3691
Joined: 17 Jan 2013 23:40

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Ouroboros » 11 Feb 2013 00:27

paultheroyal Don't give a monkeys about grammar and thought he was cup tied because he was not included in the
crawley game?


Do you understand what being cup-tied means, paul?

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Feb 2013 10:54

What a great signing.

Hit the ground running, just what we needed for a January transfer in a relegation battle. :roll:

Spose he's lucky in a way. If he did start, McD would probably put him in goal or something.

Colin Cheeselog
Member
Posts: 515
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 16:47

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Colin Cheeselog » 11 Feb 2013 11:00

Extended-Phenotype What a great signing.

Hit the ground running, just what we needed for a January transfer in a relegation battle. :roll:

Spose he's lucky in a way. If he did start, McD would probably put him in goal or something.


Yeah, further generic criticism and unfounded negativity. Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Madejski out. Everything is rubbish.


User avatar
Royalclapper
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1047
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 16:53
Location: 'Soccertainment' OUT

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Royalclapper » 11 Feb 2013 11:07

Give him a 45 min taster even when not fit. Wrap him up in cotton wool while bringing him up to full match fitness. Then, unleash him with 8 games to go where he looks a class act and sell on for big profit........perfect plan.

peterroyal76
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2427
Joined: 03 May 2009 20:14
Location: North stand B13.......where all the empty seats are!

Re: Daniel Carrico

by peterroyal76 » 11 Feb 2013 11:11

Ouroboros
paultheroyal Don't give a monkeys about grammar and thought he was cup tied because he was not included in the
crawley game?


Do you understand what being cup-tied means, paul?


:lol:

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Daniel Carrico

by sandman » 11 Feb 2013 11:17

Ouroboros
paultheroyal Don't give a monkeys about grammar and thought he was cup tied because he was not included in the
crawley game?


Do you understand what being cup-tied means, paul?

Referee in not knowing rules shocker.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Feb 2013 11:20

Colin Cheeselog
Extended-Phenotype What a great signing.

Hit the ground running, just what we needed for a January transfer in a relegation battle. :roll:

Spose he's lucky in a way. If he did start, McD would probably put him in goal or something.


Yeah, further generic criticism and unfounded negativity. Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Madejski out. Everything is rubbish.


I can take generic, but as I'm complaining about a player’s absence from the team, during which the player has been absent from the team, I’m not sure my concern could be called unfounded.


User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Daniel Carrico

by melonhead » 11 Feb 2013 11:25

he didnt say unfounded concern, he said unfounded negativity

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Feb 2013 11:32

I’m just annoyed. We did not bring in enough quality in the summer and have struggled to compete in this league, as our position shows. Anton and Brian both admitted that more investment was needed. January comes and goes and we repeat the same mistakes.

Kelly has been good and Akpan could be a decent acquisition, but in terms of needing players NOW, Carrico and Blackman aren’t ready and we still fail to bring in the creativity we all know we need.

Judging by our line-ups since our signings, we are still ending up with square pegs in round holes – this is the Premier League – fudging a team together at this level is unacceptable in my opinion.

Plenty of reasons, backed up with facts = hardly unfounded.

under the tin
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 09:21

Re: Daniel Carrico

by under the tin » 11 Feb 2013 12:08

If not unfounded, E-P, then certainly unfair.
I would not describe MAJOR bids for Gylfi and Ince as "repeating the same mistakes"
OK, neither deal came off, but it obviously wasn't for the want of trying on the club's part.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Daniel Carrico

by melonhead » 11 Feb 2013 12:22

Extended-Phenotype I’m just annoyed. We did not bring in enough quality in the summer and have struggled to compete in this league, as our position shows. Anton and Brian both admitted that more investment was needed. January comes and goes and we repeat the same mistakes.

Kelly has been good and Akpan could be a decent acquisition, but in terms of needing players NOW, Carrico and Blackman aren’t ready and we still fail to bring in the creativity we all know we need.

Judging by our line-ups since our signings, we are still ending up with square pegs in round holes – this is the Premier League – fudging a team together at this level is unacceptable in my opinion.

Plenty of reasons, backed up with facts = hardly unfounded.




still scoring goals.
was clearly at the back and in defensive midfield positions where we were most lacking.
think your view of the transfer market too simplistic.
we tried. didnt come off. move on


User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Daniel Carrico

by SPARTA » 11 Feb 2013 12:56

melonhead
Extended-Phenotype I’m just annoyed. We did not bring in enough quality in the summer and have struggled to compete in this league, as our position shows. Anton and Brian both admitted that more investment was needed. January comes and goes and we repeat the same mistakes.

Kelly has been good and Akpan could be a decent acquisition, but in terms of needing players NOW, Carrico and Blackman aren’t ready and we still fail to bring in the creativity we all know we need.

Judging by our line-ups since our signings, we are still ending up with square pegs in round holes – this is the Premier League – fudging a team together at this level is unacceptable in my opinion.

Plenty of reasons, backed up with facts = hardly unfounded.




still scoring goals.
was clearly at the back and in defensive midfield positions where we were most lacking.
think your view of the transfer market too simplistic.
we tried. didnt come off. move on


We're still conceding far to many goals though. Apart from the obvious whallopings in a couple of games, nothing has really changed in that respect.
We're still not creating many, sometimes any, chances in a 4-5-1. The goals tend to come at 4-4-2 when we throw the sink at it. That's not a tactic that can be relyed on.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Feb 2013 13:01

melonhead
Extended-Phenotype I’m just annoyed. We did not bring in enough quality in the summer and have struggled to compete in this league, as our position shows. Anton and Brian both admitted that more investment was needed. January comes and goes and we repeat the same mistakes.

Kelly has been good and Akpan could be a decent acquisition, but in terms of needing players NOW, Carrico and Blackman aren’t ready and we still fail to bring in the creativity we all know we need.

Judging by our line-ups since our signings, we are still ending up with square pegs in round holes – this is the Premier League – fudging a team together at this level is unacceptable in my opinion.

Plenty of reasons, backed up with facts = hardly unfounded.




still scoring goals.
was clearly at the back and in defensive midfield positions where we were most lacking.
think your view of the transfer market too simplistic.
we tried. didnt come off. move on


I think your view of football is too simplistic. We can score goals with 4-4-2 but look vulnerable in that formation. 4-5-1 we seem more comfortable but we create very little.

A creative midfielder would have addressed this problem. I'd happily move on, but the problem continues to plague us.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Daniel Carrico

by melonhead » 11 Feb 2013 15:02

we tried, multiple times
im happy that the club stopped at the end of their list of potential signings and decided not to draw a second list of players they didnt really want but would probably do

BenSmith91
Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 09 Feb 2013 13:31

Re: Daniel Carrico

by BenSmith91 » 11 Feb 2013 15:27

I'm happy that we didn't panic buy to be honest. Akpan looks really decent and Kelly looks like an upgraded, steady-eddie Andy Griffin replacement.

At home we still have QPR, Aston Villa, Wigan and Southampton. Away - we are facing teams such as Norwich, West Ham and Fulham. It's not a scary looking fixture list and I think we have enough to get points out of these games.

User avatar
mr_number
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3067
Joined: 23 Mar 2008 10:35

Re: Daniel Carrico

by mr_number » 11 Feb 2013 16:03

BenSmith91 I'm happy that we didn't panic buy to be honest. Akpan looks really decent and Kelly looks like an upgraded, steady-eddie Andy Griffin replacement.

At home we still have QPR, Aston Villa, Wigan and Southampton. Away - we are facing teams such as Norwich, West Ham and Fulham. It's not a scary looking fixture list and I think we have enough to get points out of these games.


Ah, youthful optimism is a beautiful thing.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Daniel Carrico

by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Feb 2013 16:04

melonhead we tried, multiple times
im happy that the club stopped at the end of their list of potential signings and decided not to draw a second list of players they didnt really want but would probably do


If our list of suitable candidates amassed to 3 footballers, I'm left wondering what our scouts were doing all year.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Daniel Carrico

by melonhead » 11 Feb 2013 16:31

there were 3 possible footballers who we identified, played in an area in which we were lacking, we thought we could afford, may be sold, would want to come here, and would most probably fit in wit the group and the ethos.

we failed to bring them in.
its a failure, cos we failed.
but the idea you just keep picking midfielders until one says yes is flawed imo

185 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mid Sussex Royal and 202 guests

It is currently 05 Nov 2024 18:52