Stadium Expansion

1747 posts
User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

Re: Stadium Expansion

by TFF » 11 Feb 2013 10:17

SLAMMED Yes but I lose my seat in the process of them building the boxes so they can piss off.


Something about omlettes, and eggs.

Cypry
Member
Posts: 995
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 13:32

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Cypry » 11 Feb 2013 10:48

Number 9
Albert Spangler The planning permission is simply renewed year on year. The East Stand's hospitality will be directly opposite the West Stand's.


I don't think this is correct. AZ has now said the club is reviewing the design and will be submitting a new planning application, which will take about a year. It therefore seems the current permission won't be implemented, as a 'simple' application to extend the time limit would take only a matter of weeks. The new proposed development could be completely different to the existing permission in terms of design, capacity etc. so we don't know what the new hospitality will entail yet and by the sounds of it, neither does the club at this stage.


^this - I think you can just forget anything you've been previously told about whether your seat will be moved etc - it's all likely to change

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Stadium Expansion

by SPARTA » 11 Feb 2013 12:03

SLAMMED
Divvy
SLAMMED Yes but I lose my seat in the process of them building the boxes so they can piss off.


You don't know that. As part of the old plans yes you did, but if they add the hospitality they are talking about, we're looking at a row of boxes, not one small area as was planned. All existing seats should be fine. The building work goes on behind us.


Nope. I was even informed about it when they originally set the plans out. I doubt anything will change.


AZ has already stated that more boxes are a consideration, so if that was to happen, all existing seats should be fine.

SLAMMED You'll be alright in the corners. It's only going to stretch across 3 blocks:



Those are the old plans, and AZ has said we are considering more hospitality than was initially planned. If they do add another row of boxes then it will be from where the current stand ends at the top, and then the second tier on top of that.

You can ignore all old plans for the above and design that was drawn up; it's all being re-drawn up and new planning submitted - not a renewal of the agreed plan.

User avatar
Rex
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5910
Joined: 15 Feb 2008 21:00
Location: Well this thread has been a rousing success.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Rex » 11 Feb 2013 21:13

TBF the plans are on hold until Slammed buys his ST. Targeted hospitality.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Stadium Expansion

by PieEater » 12 Feb 2013 13:18

SPARTA AZ has already stated that more boxes are a consideration, so if that was to happen, all existing seats should be fine.


Those are the old plans, and AZ has said we are considering more hospitality than was initially planned. If they do add another row of boxes then it will be from where the current stand ends at the top, and then the second tier on top of that.
.


How do you know that? Why would they build expensive boxes at the back of the stand when they could carve out a section in the middle with a better view as originally proposed.

IMHO I think there will be even more rows in a similar area to go, i.e boxes and 4 rows of seats in front, so rather than X to DD going it will be V to FF (ha RL!)


User avatar
The Rouge
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Giving it the Double Djokovic

Re: Stadium Expansion

by The Rouge » 12 Feb 2013 14:00

SLAMMED You'll be alright in the corners. It's only going to stretch across 3 blocks:



Will Row Z be safe? that green block looks close...

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Stadium Expansion

by SPARTA » 12 Feb 2013 17:32

PieEater
SPARTA AZ has already stated that more boxes are a consideration, so if that was to happen, all existing seats should be fine.


Those are the old plans, and AZ has said we are considering more hospitality than was initially planned. If they do add another row of boxes then it will be from where the current stand ends at the top, and then the second tier on top of that.
.


How do you know that? Why would they build expensive boxes at the back of the stand when they could carve out a section in the middle with a better view as originally proposed.


Several boxes in the middle isn't going to bring much more money in, so it will be a full line of boxes if at all. I have never seen any club expand a stand and cut out 8-10 rows of seats to accommodate new exec boxes.

We're all spaculating, but considering the club have said they are throwing out the old plans and looking at new plans and considering more hospitality than was proposed, I would throw my money on boxes at the back of (FF or GG? which ever it is), NE corner to SE corner, and then then an upper tier.

We shall see.. I expect relegation this season in any case, so these new plans will be shelved once again.

User avatar
Jay o/
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: 07 Jul 2012 11:29

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Jay o/ » 12 Feb 2013 17:50

i get the same impression as sparta, to be fair. anton said the club will re-design the expansion and they are considering more hospitality to capitalise on future income. that means the old plans are just that, old, and no longer worth considering. more hospitality he said, so it's a fair assumption that means more than we had originally drawn up that spammed is so emotional over. more almost certainly means a full row of exec boxes, and i find it highly unlikely (though not impossible, granted) that we would disrupt that many people just so the boxes were that bit closer to the pitch. they imo will be right behind the current back row and then we build back, and that will be a very impressive stand if it ever gets built.

User avatar
Alexander Litvinenko
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2709
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 13:58
Location: Winner - HNA? Music Quiz 2013. The Great Sounds of Polonium 210.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Alexander Litvinenko » 12 Feb 2013 17:54

ISTR that in the old plans the "boxes" in the East Stand wasn't the full-blown hospitality area but was much more a members' bar area, more like the Club1871 in the corner than the real posh stuff. At the time they had no plans for extensive corporate-standard kitchens there, and no easy way of linking to the main catering suites behind the West Stand, so a glorified bar was going to be the best they'd be able to do.


User avatar
Divvy
Member
Posts: 897
Joined: 12 Sep 2012 21:09

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Divvy » 12 Feb 2013 17:58

As long as they leave Row BB alone I don't mind; but seriously, I too can't see them ripping up a whole line of several rows just for boxes. I know they planned it for a small section in the middle, but not a whole lines worth. Any boxes would most likely be part of the new build behind the existing stand, and the majority of the work can take place without causing any disruption to the fans (95% of which are STH's in the East Stand - or were). Quite why people are still posting the old plans are getting pent up about them I don't know. As Anton has said, they're being re-written, so it will all change.

User avatar
Whore Jackie
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2638
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 13:48
Location: Over 'ere

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Whore Jackie » 12 Feb 2013 22:19

Alexander Litvinenko ISTR that in the old plans the "boxes" in the East Stand wasn't the full-blown hospitality area but was much more a members' bar area, more like the Club1871 in the corner than the real posh stuff. At the time they had no plans for extensive corporate-standard kitchens there, and no easy way of linking to the main catering suites behind the West Stand, so a glorified bar was going to be the best they'd be able to do.


That's my recollection too.

Can't imagine them not opting for hospitality areas with access to a kitchen, to give as much flexibility as possible. Bar 1871 changed from a glorified bar last season, to match sponsors with food room this year.

User avatar
Alexander Litvinenko
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2709
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 13:58
Location: Winner - HNA? Music Quiz 2013. The Great Sounds of Polonium 210.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Alexander Litvinenko » 12 Feb 2013 23:04

Whore Jackie
Alexander Litvinenko ISTR that in the old plans the "boxes" in the East Stand wasn't the full-blown hospitality area but was much more a members' bar area, more like the Club1871 in the corner than the real posh stuff. At the time they had no plans for extensive corporate-standard kitchens there, and no easy way of linking to the main catering suites behind the West Stand, so a glorified bar was going to be the best they'd be able to do.


That's my recollection too.

Can't imagine them not opting for hospitality areas with access to a kitchen, to give as much flexibility as possible. Bar 1871 changed from a glorified bar last season, to match sponsors with food room this year.


Yep, the point is that if they build "corporate standard" hospitality areas there then they need to have a whole kitchen set-up, virtually duplicating what's in the West, and I'm not sure there's the space in the East for that without major and expensive changes that i don't think would be cost justified.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Stadium Expansion

by PieEater » 12 Feb 2013 23:52

I don't know why people think the new plans will consider the impact to fans more, his Madj after building the club up for years didn't, AZ will have less inclination to accommodate or minimize the impact to supporters.

Be under no illusions we are just shit on their shoes that they will wipe off to make a fast buck.

I've no doubt they will do what is best for the corporates and impacted fans will just have to make way.


User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by winchester_royal » 12 Feb 2013 23:56

'Greed, the last thing a club who wants to build a new stadium to attract more fans to fill a bigger stadium is going to do is consider the match day experience of supporters.

:|

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Stadium Expansion

by PieEater » 13 Feb 2013 08:52

That's not at all what I said, but carry on.

West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3106
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: Stadium Expansion

by West Stand Man » 13 Feb 2013 10:49

PieEater That's not at all what I said, but carry on.



It is a pretty good summary of what you said - even if that is not what you meant.

User avatar
Bandini
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3761
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 16:01
Location: No one must know I dropped my glasses in the toilet.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Bandini » 13 Feb 2013 11:08

This is all very exciting. There's no doubt that there's the demand for a stadium expansion, so let's hope this gets done sooner rather than later.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Stadium Expansion

by PieEater » 13 Feb 2013 11:09

What I said was that the new designers priority on location of the exec boxes will have the impact to fans who sat in their seat for years pretty low down their list of considerations on where they site it, and that nobody should expect less impact because new plans are being drawn up.

The previous plans had a bar area and that impacted people, exec boxes would cause a bigger impact if located in the same place. If fans impact was a priority why was the bar area sited where it was when they could of put it at the back and impacted no one?

Anyone who expects the boxes to be tagged on somewhere that doesn't have the best views is IMHO wrong. But lets wait and see.

User avatar
Alexander Litvinenko
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2709
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 13:58
Location: Winner - HNA? Music Quiz 2013. The Great Sounds of Polonium 210.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Alexander Litvinenko » 13 Feb 2013 11:14

It's a balancing act - if they didn't want to force anyone to move or to ever be inconvenienced we'd still be at Elm Park, so they can't let a relatively small number of people derail the whole exercise.

All they can do is make sure they're fair and do the best to minimise the inconvenience to those forced to move - for instance by offering them a discount ST and giving the, the first pick of the new seats.

But even if they do that, you can be sure that there'll still be some people who'll dig their heels in and object just because they can and because they want to be a martyr.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Stadium Expansion

by melonhead » 13 Feb 2013 11:19

*RL

1747 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests

It is currently 19 Nov 2024 08:29