SLAMMED Yes but I lose my seat in the process of them building the boxes so they can piss off.
Something about omlettes, and eggs.
by TFF » 11 Feb 2013 10:17
SLAMMED Yes but I lose my seat in the process of them building the boxes so they can piss off.
by Cypry » 11 Feb 2013 10:48
Number 9Albert Spangler The planning permission is simply renewed year on year. The East Stand's hospitality will be directly opposite the West Stand's.
I don't think this is correct. AZ has now said the club is reviewing the design and will be submitting a new planning application, which will take about a year. It therefore seems the current permission won't be implemented, as a 'simple' application to extend the time limit would take only a matter of weeks. The new proposed development could be completely different to the existing permission in terms of design, capacity etc. so we don't know what the new hospitality will entail yet and by the sounds of it, neither does the club at this stage.
by SPARTA » 11 Feb 2013 12:03
SLAMMEDDivvySLAMMED Yes but I lose my seat in the process of them building the boxes so they can piss off.
You don't know that. As part of the old plans yes you did, but if they add the hospitality they are talking about, we're looking at a row of boxes, not one small area as was planned. All existing seats should be fine. The building work goes on behind us.
Nope. I was even informed about it when they originally set the plans out. I doubt anything will change.
SLAMMED You'll be alright in the corners. It's only going to stretch across 3 blocks:
by Rex » 11 Feb 2013 21:13
by PieEater » 12 Feb 2013 13:18
SPARTA AZ has already stated that more boxes are a consideration, so if that was to happen, all existing seats should be fine.
Those are the old plans, and AZ has said we are considering more hospitality than was initially planned. If they do add another row of boxes then it will be from where the current stand ends at the top, and then the second tier on top of that.
.
by The Rouge » 12 Feb 2013 14:00
SLAMMED You'll be alright in the corners. It's only going to stretch across 3 blocks:
by SPARTA » 12 Feb 2013 17:32
PieEaterSPARTA AZ has already stated that more boxes are a consideration, so if that was to happen, all existing seats should be fine.
Those are the old plans, and AZ has said we are considering more hospitality than was initially planned. If they do add another row of boxes then it will be from where the current stand ends at the top, and then the second tier on top of that.
.
How do you know that? Why would they build expensive boxes at the back of the stand when they could carve out a section in the middle with a better view as originally proposed.
by Jay o/ » 12 Feb 2013 17:50
by Alexander Litvinenko » 12 Feb 2013 17:54
by Divvy » 12 Feb 2013 17:58
by Whore Jackie » 12 Feb 2013 22:19
Alexander Litvinenko ISTR that in the old plans the "boxes" in the East Stand wasn't the full-blown hospitality area but was much more a members' bar area, more like the Club1871 in the corner than the real posh stuff. At the time they had no plans for extensive corporate-standard kitchens there, and no easy way of linking to the main catering suites behind the West Stand, so a glorified bar was going to be the best they'd be able to do.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 12 Feb 2013 23:04
Whore JackieAlexander Litvinenko ISTR that in the old plans the "boxes" in the East Stand wasn't the full-blown hospitality area but was much more a members' bar area, more like the Club1871 in the corner than the real posh stuff. At the time they had no plans for extensive corporate-standard kitchens there, and no easy way of linking to the main catering suites behind the West Stand, so a glorified bar was going to be the best they'd be able to do.
That's my recollection too.
Can't imagine them not opting for hospitality areas with access to a kitchen, to give as much flexibility as possible. Bar 1871 changed from a glorified bar last season, to match sponsors with food room this year.
by PieEater » 12 Feb 2013 23:52
by winchester_royal » 12 Feb 2013 23:56
by PieEater » 13 Feb 2013 08:52
by West Stand Man » 13 Feb 2013 10:49
PieEater That's not at all what I said, but carry on.
by Bandini » 13 Feb 2013 11:08
by PieEater » 13 Feb 2013 11:09
by Alexander Litvinenko » 13 Feb 2013 11:14
by melonhead » 13 Feb 2013 11:19
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests