Maguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
+1
by mr_number » 13 Mar 2013 09:26
Maguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 13 Mar 2013 09:27
ZacNaloenDenver Royal
"Its emerging that Reading did not have a successor lined-up when they sacked Brian McDermott on Monday , just 33 days after he won Premier League manager of the Month for January".
So with 9 games to go - 4 of which are Man Yoo, Arse, Liverpool and City -we are starting a search...
Don't believe for a second the sacking was about "saving the season" so why would they?
It was because he lost the fans and Anton saw it.
We'll get a new manager in, who's remit won't be "save Reading at all costs" but "Do your best this season, but it's all about the long term plan, nice football please".
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 13 Mar 2013 09:31
Maguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
by mr_number » 13 Mar 2013 09:34
Who Moved The Goalposts?
100% agree. In that respect, the timing is actually about right as on on one respect AZ can't win, and on another he can't lose.
by maffff » 13 Mar 2013 09:37
Maguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
by mr_number » 13 Mar 2013 09:40
maffffMaguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
But if he's lost the players?
by HoneyRoastHoax » 13 Mar 2013 09:43
Maguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
by Hoop Blah » 13 Mar 2013 09:44
Maguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
by The Rouge » 13 Mar 2013 09:45
by The Rouge » 13 Mar 2013 09:46
Hoop BlahMaguire If you're making decisions based on what the fans think then you really are an idiot.
Not really.
The fans are the ones who really make the club.
by sandman » 13 Mar 2013 09:49
Sanguinesandmanblueroyals Definitely don't want Adkins. He'd get us playing nicer football but after spending £20m in the summer and end up no better than we are is a joke. We might be shit but at least it didn't cost us £20m.
Would like anybody that will get us playing nice football (apart from Adkins, did I mention that?). It didn't work under Rogers because he wasn't given the budget to bring in decent players. With Zingarevich's money [b]we could be the next Swansea [/b]:!:
Shudder
Centre back passes to centre back, passes back to the keeper, to the centre back, to the defensive midfielder....continues for the next half an hour aaannndd they're over the half way line, oh wait they've gone back to the keeper.
Oh and Rodgers had money to work with.
Yeah, we don't want two good seasons in the PL and a cup win. Boooo.
by Sanguine » 13 Mar 2013 09:54
by Wycombe Royal » 13 Mar 2013 09:59
The Rouge He is not a crazy owner, he thinks he knows his football, he is a businessman, he would have come to his own decision about the manager situation.
But in part at least, the vocal fans on Saturday got him sacked.
by The Rouge » 13 Mar 2013 10:00
Wycombe RoyalThe Rouge He is not a crazy owner, he thinks he knows his football, he is a businessman, he would have come to his own decision about the manager situation.
But in part at least, the vocal fans on Saturday got him sacked.
If he is as crazy as some seem to think then McD would not have lasted this long, if anything he would have fired him when he took over the club. In mt opinion AZ has been too loyal to McD and should have fired him in December.
by sandman » 13 Mar 2013 10:06
Sanguine Apparently it's more effective than McDermott's version of tiki-taka.
by Sanguine » 13 Mar 2013 10:15
by Hoop Blah » 13 Mar 2013 10:25
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 13 Mar 2013 10:32
Sanguine That’s a big leap. McDermott’s football was very effective in the Championship, and I have a huge amount of respect for the man and what he achieved at Reading. But that doesn’t mean there are not other ways to play football and other ways to succeed. As you know I followed Liverpool growing up – a diet of patient passing football, I quite like Swansea’s (and more recently Liverpool’s) approach, I wouldn’t be disappointed at all if we started to play that way. Any sort of style that sees us retain possession of the ball, and look comfortable with it, would be very welcome.
by leicsRoyal » 13 Mar 2013 10:35
by melonhead » 13 Mar 2013 10:37
Who Moved The Goalposts?Sanguine That’s a big leap. McDermott’s football was very effective in the Championship, and I have a huge amount of respect for the man and what he achieved at Reading. But that doesn’t mean there are not other ways to play football and other ways to succeed. As you know I followed Liverpool growing up – a diet of patient passing football, I quite like Swansea’s (and more recently Liverpool’s) approach, I wouldn’t be disappointed at all if we started to play that way. Any sort of style that sees us retain possession of the ball, and look comfortable with it, would be very welcome.
And therein lies one of the reasons behind AZ's decision to sack Brian. Eveyone knows he may have been capable of getting us back up. A playoff final and champions in two successive seasons proves that. The major doubt is his ability to adapt to the requirements of the PL once there. I don't think Brian has it in him, and neither does the board by the looks of it.
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Jinx, Royals and Racers and 272 guests