by Lovely hot donuts! »
22 Feb 2013 09:07
"Reading v Wigan
Reading have been on a good run, in fact, a very, very good run. They've won four of their last seven in the league.
Wigan have been in this position many times before. I'll say that the Latics will edge this one.
Whenever you think they aren't playing well and go away expecting to be beaten, they surprise you.
I'm banking on them this weekend. They're also coming into this match on the back of an impressive 4-1 win away to Huddersfield in the FA Cup. Manager Roberto Martinez had made changes to starting XI, which makes that victory all the more impressive.
Were Wigan unsettled earlier this season when there were rumours Martinez was set to leave? No.
And in all fairness, chairman Dave Whelan didn't stand in his way. If Liverpool came calling then what else could the Spaniard have done in that situation?
Lawro's prediction: 1-2"
Is it just me or is half of what Lawro's written here make no sense and/or is irrelevant.
He starts by saying that we're on a good run and then doesn't acknowledge us again.
He then says he fancies wigan because they beat a championship team
And then rambles on about Martinez for no reason.
He is seriously clueless, he could at least right something that makes some bloody sense to explain why he thinks we're going to lose at home to bloody Wigan!