by TheSaintlee » 26 Mar 2013 17:06
by Denver Royal » 26 Mar 2013 17:06
Ian Royal This is why we're "trading up". Because he's shown more signs of adapting to the PL. And because he brings fresh perspective and a s;ightly different style of football. McDermott looked to me like he'd got tunnel vision and was too close to the problem to see it effectively and move to solve it. Also the solution was to go against his natural instincts in how to play football. That's why you can argue we needed a change. And why even if Adkins is about the same quality as a manager to McDermott it's a good move.
by Sanguine » 26 Mar 2013 17:10
by Hoop Blah » 26 Mar 2013 17:23
Extended-Phenotype Oh what a surprise, an article sourcing three swooners over Adkins. How broad.
What has Adkins done that Brian (a) hasn't or (b) couldn't have done with £33m, apart from grow his own hair?
by Ian Royal » 26 Mar 2013 17:32
Denver RoyalIan Royal This is why we're "trading up". Because he's shown more signs of adapting to the PL. And because he brings fresh perspective and a s;ightly different style of football. McDermott looked to me like he'd got tunnel vision and was too close to the problem to see it effectively and move to solve it. Also the solution was to go against his natural instincts in how to play football. That's why you can argue we needed a change. And why even if Adkins is about the same quality as a manager to McDermott it's a good move.
So,
A) You've always thought Adkins was the better manager than McD, and
B) You think Soton made a huge mistake in getting rid?
by Extended-Phenotype » 26 Mar 2013 17:40
Hoop BlahExtended-Phenotype Oh what a surprise, an article sourcing three swooners over Adkins. How broad.
What has Adkins done that Brian (a) hasn't or (b) couldn't have done with £33m, apart from grow his own hair?
Well he's proved he can rebuild more than one squad that he already had an existing close working relationship with (I know Dirk and I have discussed McDermotts longevity in the past as his best work seemed to be done with players he knew previously and didn't have to build a new team as such).
He's shown that he can attract and work with a 'better quality' of player and spend money that's available to him. It certainly seems that one of the key bug bears for Zingaravich was the lack on incoming quality even when he gave McDermott funds.
He's shown that he can turn TWO long ball teams into effective passing teams quite quickly and with good results.
If we're looking at rebuilding a new squad, spending more money on quality players and adopting a new style of play that the club think will suit us more in the modern game and, hopefully, in the Premier League then those qualities make him a decent proposition don't they EP?
by Maguire » 26 Mar 2013 17:40
TheSaintlee was it a league 1 squad with saints?
we kept players who we went down with and in admin...luckily selling David McGodlrick and Drew Surman to keep us afloat in adkin until Markus Leibherr came in.
Kelvin Davis - Easily a champ player
Harding - Ditto
Fonte - was linked with bolton in the prem but we paid him more and actually dropped to league 1 for a season
Richardson - Played in the prem and Champ with Leeds
Jaidi - prem experience
Morgan Schneiderlin - French U21 captain at the time and now brilliant
Lallana - way too good for league 1
Puncheon - ditto
Lambert - easily ditto
Oxland-Chamberlain. yep
Chaplow - bought from the champ
it was clear for all to see that the squad in league 1 was the most expensive ever assembled and not fot a managerial change at the start of 2010/2011 season, we would have won the league.
so, as a saints fan, I am not going to come here and say that adkins took a bunch of league 1 standard players and worked miracles to finish 2nd in league 1.
it was the bare minimum.
the season in the NPC was a different matter. only to be bettered by a certain Mr McDermot
by winchester_royal » 26 Mar 2013 17:43
Extended-PhenotypeHoop BlahExtended-Phenotype Oh what a surprise, an article sourcing three swooners over Adkins. How broad.
What has Adkins done that Brian (a) hasn't or (b) couldn't have done with £33m, apart from grow his own hair?
Well he's proved he can rebuild more than one squad that he already had an existing close working relationship with (I know Dirk and I have discussed McDermotts longevity in the past as his best work seemed to be done with players he knew previously and didn't have to build a new team as such).
He's shown that he can attract and work with a 'better quality' of player and spend money that's available to him. It certainly seems that one of the key bug bears for Zingaravich was the lack on incoming quality even when he gave McDermott funds.
He's shown that he can turn TWO long ball teams into effective passing teams quite quickly and with good results.
If we're looking at rebuilding a new squad, spending more money on quality players and adopting a new style of play that the club think will suit us more in the modern game and, hopefully, in the Premier League then those qualities make him a decent proposition don't they EP?
I like this. This makes me feel a bit more positive, cheers.
To the saint fella, I suppose you were banging on about McD being better than Adkins while he was still your manager, yeah?
by Maguire » 26 Mar 2013 17:46
TheSaintlee any comparison with rogers is just wrong, you lot must have seen us lob it back stick to lambert
by howser » 26 Mar 2013 17:47
by Maguire » 26 Mar 2013 17:48
by Hoop Blah » 26 Mar 2013 17:49
by Hoop Blah » 26 Mar 2013 17:50
Maguire Setting football aside, can we all at least agree that Adkins seems like a total helmet of a bloke compared to McDermott?
by windermere_royal » 26 Mar 2013 17:50
Maguire Setting football aside, can we all at least agree that Adkins seems like a total helmet of a bloke compared to McDermott?
by winchester_royal » 26 Mar 2013 17:51
MaguireTheSaintlee any comparison with rogers is just wrong, you lot must have seen us lob it back stick to lambert
Exactly! Hundreds of times. Nothing wrong with that as it created buckets of chances but you'd think by reading this board that we're going to get turned from a bunch of long ball merchants (we're not) into Brazil (we're not).
Our football this season has been ugly because the players aren't good enough. Of course that's partly the fault of the manager but all this talk of Adkins' "intellectual, passing style" is bobbins.
by Hoop Blah » 26 Mar 2013 17:51
Extended-Phenotype I like this. This makes me feel a bit more positive, cheers.
by Maguire » 26 Mar 2013 17:53
Hoop BlahMaguire Setting football aside, can we all at least agree that Adkins seems like a total helmet of a bloke compared to McDermott?
I certainly know who I'd rather have a beer with yeah.
by TheSaintlee » 26 Mar 2013 17:59
Hoop Blah I tend to ignore any poster who refers to leagues as the NPC or EPL etc, it just hurts my eyes to read it.
As for the League 1 squad not being a League 1 squad. They got relegated to it the season before so in my book, as good as some of the players were (or are getting now after a few years of good management and the confidence of winning), they were a League 1 squad.
by SCIAG » 26 Mar 2013 18:09
by sandman » 26 Mar 2013 18:12
windermere_royalMaguire Setting football aside, can we all at least agree that Adkins seems like a total helmet of a bloke compared to McDermott?
very true, he didn`t say "we move on" once during the interview
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Plymouth exile, rabidbee and 212 guests