by ManchesterRoyals » 06 Apr 2013 17:12
by Za Vas » 06 Apr 2013 17:12
by sandman » 06 Apr 2013 17:13
ManchesterRoyals Brian thought they were good enough, blame him
by ManchesterRoyals » 06 Apr 2013 17:14
sandmanManchesterRoyals Brian thought they were good enough, blame him
I thought it was Leigertwood's fault. Or was it Jobi's?
by RoyalBlue » 06 Apr 2013 17:16
Ideal We had one single decent chance at scoring, at home, against mouthampton.. the rest were all speculative long range efforts that would never go in in a million years.
Is that good enough?
by sandman » 06 Apr 2013 17:17
by windermere_royal » 06 Apr 2013 17:18
by ManchesterRoyals » 06 Apr 2013 17:22
sandman Well Hammond appointed McDermott so it must be his fault then? Or is it Madejski's fault for appointing Hammond? Then again Smee sold the club to Madejski so it must be his fault.
by ManchesterRoyals » 06 Apr 2013 17:26
Ideal He picks the tactics. He picks the starting 11. His job to make sure the players listen to his tactical instructions, and make them believe in the tactic.
Players seemingly aborted his plan of action after a short time, indicates lack of conviction.
by maffff » 06 Apr 2013 17:27
by Alexander Litvinenko » 06 Apr 2013 17:40
by winchester_royal » 06 Apr 2013 17:41
by windermere_royal » 06 Apr 2013 17:44
winchester_royal Ideal in being clueless bore shocker. This is Brian's squad, who've been drilled in Brian's style of football. Impossible for Adkins to turn it all around in 2 weeks.
We need to tear up this particular bunch and start again. Any who don't have the patience to sit through a few bad results in the evolution of a squad/system that can be as good as Saints were today should probably leave now.
Enough of this spoit 'I want it all and I want it now' crap. Time to rebuild.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 06 Apr 2013 17:50
Ideal The simple question was either yes or no, is one proper chance at scoring good enough, at home, against southampton.
Yet none of you seem able to answer that, you just come up with loads of excuses and namecalling. Maybe you want to answer the question, yes or no, is it good enough?
by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Apr 2013 17:52
Alexander Litvinenko I'm confused.
There was the header from the corner that Morrison headed over after 5 minutes, and the ALF blaze over from 5 yards after 22 minutes, or the good save at the foot of the post from Akpan a few minutes later - which one is the "single decent chance" you're talking about?
by sandman » 06 Apr 2013 17:53
by ManchesterRoyals » 06 Apr 2013 18:07
IdealMmmMonsterMunchIdeal The simple question was either yes or no, is one proper chance at scoring good enough, at home, against southampton.
Yet none of you seem able to answer that, you just come up with loads of excuses and namecalling. Maybe you want to answer the question, yes or no, is it good enough?
What a BS question.
OF COURSE IT ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH - IN ANY LEAGUE AT ANY LEVEL. WHAT POINT ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE EXACTLY SEEING AS YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION???!
I wasn't the one claiming that Adkins would bring gifts, candy and intelligent football taking us to the next level.
Clearly we've gotten worse, not only worse, but much worse. Yet people are in such strong denial they are failing to realize this very reality of things.
by P!ssed Off » 06 Apr 2013 18:10
IdealMmmMonsterMunchIdeal The simple question was either yes or no, is one proper chance at scoring good enough, at home, against southampton.
Yet none of you seem able to answer that, you just come up with loads of excuses and namecalling. Maybe you want to answer the question, yes or no, is it good enough?
What a BS question.
OF COURSE IT ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH - IN ANY LEAGUE AT ANY LEVEL. WHAT POINT ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE EXACTLY SEEING AS YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION???!
I wasn't the one claiming that Adkins would bring gifts, candy and intelligent football taking us to the next level.
Clearly we've gotten worse, not only worse, but much worse. Yet people are in such strong denial they are failing to realize this very reality of things.
by winchester_royal » 06 Apr 2013 18:13
by Agent Balti » 06 Apr 2013 18:18
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Google [Bot], Mr Angry, Richard, UpThePrem, windermereROYAL and 196 guests