SIGNED - Nick Blackman

285 posts
User avatar
St. Brynjar
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1514
Joined: 13 May 2012 19:48
Location: Cambridge

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by St. Brynjar » 20 Apr 2013 21:02

Anyone who expected Blackman to keep us up is an idiot. He'll be a reasonable Championship striker next year. Plenty of time to 'come good'.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Wycombe Royal » 20 Apr 2013 21:04

P!ssed Off
winchester_royal
andrew1957
The Jan window was a poor one for RFC but we have no idea who was to blame for that.

Brian - lack of targets?
Hammond - failing to do deals?
Anton failing to stump up serious cash? - yes we made a few bids that were never going to happen but there seemed no serious intent to splash the cash - which makes me think the decision to sack Brian had already been made then.


Brian always had final say on targets. Do you not think that spending 1.2m on Blackman that could have gone elsewhere was a bad piece of management?


Blackman in League 1 this season: 28 games, 11 goals. Woahhhhhh this is amazing for a young player, he's only 23!!!! I see potential, bargain for £1.2 million etc.

Er, no. Who's top scorer in League 1?: Yeovil's Paddy Madden 34 games, 23 goals. And the kicker, he's 4 months younger than Blackman.

Joint second top scorer in League 1?: Walsall's Will Grigg 36 games, 19 goals. Age: 21.

Conclusions: Blackman was signed on the basis of one decent season. A quick glance at League 1 top scorers table shows there are at least two strikers in League 1 who are A: much more prolific. and B: younger. I would also imagine they would be much cheaper than £1.2 million.

Blackman was a terrible buy.

Wasn't he used quite a lot on the wing for the Blades, in which case it is unfair to compare his scoring stats to out and out strikers.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11777
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by RoyalBlue » 20 Apr 2013 21:10

St. Brynjar Anyone who expected Blackman to keep us up is an idiot. He'll be a reasonable Championship striker next year. Plenty of time to 'come good'.


Well you've outed McDermott with the first part of that!

He should have been signing players to keep us up! :twisted:

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Ian Royal » 20 Apr 2013 21:33

Ouroboros
Ian Royal My thoughts on Blackman.

He's not a winger: He's got ok control, but his crossing isn't great and doesn't seem to know how to beat a man.
He's not striker: He's not even shown the barest hint he might score a goal.
He's not an attacking midfielder: His passing and awareness isn't good enough.

He's had the odd decent moment in matches, but has generally been a massive lump of underwhelming mediocrity. I have never seen a professional footballer conceed a foul throw by stepping onto the pitch whilst throwing it. It's not like it was just his toe. If the ball had been as far over the line against Liverpool as his foot was today we'd have two extra points.


Southampton, and 0 more points.

Ah yes, mixed it up with Reina's tip over.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Ian Royal » 20 Apr 2013 21:39

St. Brynjar Anyone who expected Blackman to keep us up is an idiot. He'll be a reasonable Championship striker next year. Plenty of time to 'come good'.

Who's said they did?

At £1.2m though he certainly seems very overpriced for what he is so far. And given in January we needed to buy players who would make a difference this season, that's doubly a waste of money.

I'm worried he's a player who's quite good technically but doesn't really have a position and doesn't really work well anywhere.


User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12094
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Maguire » 20 Apr 2013 21:49

LOL@writing off Blackman already

You utter morons/racists.

User avatar
Arnie_Pie
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1523
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 13:43
Location: Purple Turtle

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Arnie_Pie » 20 Apr 2013 21:59

Maguire LOL@writing off Blackman already

You utter morons/racists.


+1

This forum is so full of feckin idiots nowadays it is embarrassing.

User avatar
St. Brynjar
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1514
Joined: 13 May 2012 19:48
Location: Cambridge

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by St. Brynjar » 20 Apr 2013 22:00

Ian Royal
St. Brynjar Anyone who expected Blackman to keep us up is an idiot. He'll be a reasonable Championship striker next year. Plenty of time to 'come good'.

Who's said they did?

At £1.2m though he certainly seems very overpriced for what he is so far. And given in January we needed to buy players who would make a difference this season, that's doubly a waste of money.

I'm worried he's a player who's quite good technically but doesn't really have a position and doesn't really work well anywhere.

Well I feel he's shouldering an unfair portion of the blame for today's defeat and others before this.

£1.2 million is a lot but bear in mind he's A) A striker, B) Relatively young, and C) English. All those things hike up the price tag. Give him a chance and I think he'll do great next year, fairly strong pacey striker. He should decide if he's a striker or a winger though, I don't like players who are jack of all trades, master of none.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by winchester_royal » 20 Apr 2013 22:01

FTR I rate Blackman and think he'll prove to be a decent signing. I was just testing Andrew's commitment to BMc.


sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by sandman » 20 Apr 2013 22:01

Showed some nice touches whenever I've seen him could be a very useful player in the Championship.

grey_squirrel
Member
Posts: 940
Joined: 19 May 2011 21:28
Location: Y24

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by grey_squirrel » 20 Apr 2013 22:10

Wimb Can't believe he's being written off already. He's played what five games for a team that's got one of the worst points totals in Premier League history, one that's been constantly changing teams, formations, strategy etc.

He's got potential and age on his side. It took Longy until he was about 23/24 to really start putting it together so don't be too quick to dismiss him.

Of course he could turn out to be a bust but I don't think you can blame our relegation on £1.2m going to Blackman, who else was it going to go on to keep us up.


I don't see any potential.

I didn't see/hear SheffU rioting over his departure.

I haven't seen him do anything in his minutes on the pitch where I thought 'that's good!' . You could see Long had something even during his development years.

And yes - of course - let's blame Blackman for our relegation. It is of course all, totally his fault isn't it?! :roll: :roll:

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Ian Royal » 20 Apr 2013 22:13

St. Brynjar
Ian Royal
St. Brynjar Anyone who expected Blackman to keep us up is an idiot. He'll be a reasonable Championship striker next year. Plenty of time to 'come good'.

Who's said they did?

At £1.2m though he certainly seems very overpriced for what he is so far. And given in January we needed to buy players who would make a difference this season, that's doubly a waste of money.

I'm worried he's a player who's quite good technically but doesn't really have a position and doesn't really work well anywhere.

Well I feel he's shouldering an unfair portion of the blame for today's defeat and others before this.

£1.2 million is a lot but bear in mind he's A) A striker, B) Relatively young, and C) English. All those things hike up the price tag. Give him a chance and I think he'll do great next year, fairly strong pacey striker. He should decide if he's a striker or a winger though, I don't like players who are jack of all trades, master of none.

Is anyone blaming him for the loss? I see people seeing he didn't impress them and could have done better. Personally I'd have said that the ones responsible for our defeat were the defensive unit that stood and watched as Bennett pounced on the rebound from McCarthy's first good save, McCarthy making a weak punch under pressure and the defenders failing to get to it first for Bennett's second. Mariappa (I think) also lost Holt a couple of times on set plays, giving him free headers.

I don't see anything to suggest Blackman should be first choice upfront or on the wing next season, but it's early days in his career and I don't see why he couldn't do a job as third or fourth choice at least.

User avatar
RoyallyFcuked
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1258
Joined: 18 Jul 2012 02:29
Location: Y25 Row KK 2005-2007

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by RoyallyFcuked » 20 Apr 2013 22:24

We are such a LOL in the transfer market really aren't we? It is clear the club didnt really have any transfer targets in January, as we just signed League 1 players off the back of FA Cup games. Hope Akpan fair enough, he is potentially going to a be a good player, but Blackman? Really? Its not like he was even prolific in League 1, and he isnt actualyly that young either. He has looked well out of his depth since he joined in all honesty.

And when you consider the price, well... 1.2m for an unproven player who hasnt really done anything in his career yet.

And 350k for Le Fondre who scored 60 goals in 110 games for Rotherham and has scored goals where ever he has been before that. I think the prices would be fairer if they were reversed. I think it was because we could rip off Rotherham and Sheffield United could demand a higher fee that we should not have paid.
Last edited by RoyallyFcuked on 20 Apr 2013 23:21, edited 1 time in total.


The Royal
Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 31 Aug 2012 21:00

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by The Royal » 20 Apr 2013 22:48

Nick Crapman is shit, like playing with 10 men

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7208
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Royal Ginger » 20 Apr 2013 22:49

He's suffered from being a bit part player in a time of massive upheaval. A run in the team at Championship level and i'm sure we'll all be singing his name. He's got 11 goals from 28 appearances for the Blades, with a bunch of those appearances coming on the wing, he's clearly got something about him.

User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7208
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Royal Ginger » 20 Apr 2013 22:50

The Royal Nick Crapman is shit, like playing with 10 men


Thanks for your well constructed and thought out argument. I'm off to contemplate it's nuances.

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by sandman » 21 Apr 2013 00:06

The Royal Nick Crapman is shit, like playing with 10 men


How very erudite.

Unbelievable Jeff
Member
Posts: 746
Joined: 04 Apr 2013 18:30

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by Unbelievable Jeff » 21 Apr 2013 11:00

The Royal Nick Crapman is shit, like playing with 10 men


Nick "Crapman" is not "shit"

He has been thrown in at the deep end, coming from league one, to the best league in the world is obviously going to be tough. He has shown some encouraging signs... He has a great touch, he can hold of a man and he has decent pace.

If you had any clue about football, you will see he has potential. Especially in the championship next season, and he was also not playing in his preferred position

Oh, and Happy 9th Birthday

The Royal
Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 31 Aug 2012 21:00

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by The Royal » 21 Apr 2013 12:45

Unbelievable Jeff
The Royal Nick Crapman is shit, like playing with 10 men


Nick "Crapman" is not "shit"

He has been thrown in at the deep end, coming from league one, to the best league in the world is obviously going to be tough. He has shown some encouraging signs... He has a great touch, he can hold of a man and he has decent pace.

If you had any clue about football, you will see he has potential. Especially in the championship next season, and he was also not playing in his preferred position

Oh, and Happy 9th Birthday


1. The prem is not the best league in the world anymore
2. If he ain't ready for the prem, don't oxf*rd buy him
3. If you watched any of his games for his previous club, he played on the wing or just behind the striker with most colas coming from the wing, so no he was not playing out of position
4. He has the touch of a rapist

MeMeMe
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 19:13

Re: SIGNED - Nick Blackman

by MeMeMe » 21 Apr 2013 12:57

The Royal
Unbelievable Jeff
The Royal Nick Crapman is shit, like playing with 10 men


Nick "Crapman" is not "shit"

He has been thrown in at the deep end, coming from league one, to the best league in the world is obviously going to be tough. He has shown some encouraging signs... He has a great touch, he can hold of a man and he has decent pace.

If you had any clue about football, you will see he has potential. Especially in the championship next season, and he was also not playing in his preferred position

Oh, and Happy 9th Birthday


1. The prem is not the best league in the world anymore
2. If he ain't ready for the prem, don't oxf*rd buy him
3. If you watched any of his games for his previous club, he played on the wing or just behind the striker with most colas coming from the wing, so no he was not playing out of position
4. He has the touch of a rapist


Point 2: But hey he was cheap.... and he 'might' have been good in the Prem !.... "We move on" as they say :roll:

285 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests

It is currently 19 Nov 2024 14:24