by winchester_royal » 23 Apr 2013 16:09
by melonhead » 23 Apr 2013 16:09
by Ian Royal » 23 Apr 2013 17:49
WaylenstreetMouldyRoyalWaylenstreet I cant see how a supporter ( no ad homs from me, no inverted commas ) cant see the obvious.
Please provide some evidence of whatever is obvious. At the moment this is just baseless accusation. Why should we take you seriously?
You shouldn't.
You should take a long cold look at the last few years in the history of the club and its financial position.
Its not as though the elephant in the room has only just appeared.
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 23 Apr 2013 17:59
by The Goat was fed » 23 Apr 2013 18:13
by Ian Royal » 23 Apr 2013 18:15
The Goat was fed Not for the first time, my Dad (who has an irrational hatred for Nicky Hammond) has brazenly logged on my account and posted utter drivel. I can only apologise.
Personally, I think the common denominator is having less points than 17 other teams in the league.
by Waylenstreet » 23 Apr 2013 18:43
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Apr 2013 18:52
Waylenstreet Well first of all I am not going to address strawmen.
I have at no point suggested that SJM personally trousered the money.
And I have made clear that I think no fraudulent activity has gone on.
What I said was that for SJM his involvement was not out of any love of the game..and he has said so himself.
So, he treated the club as another branch of his organisation.
Which meant that when funds were needed the club had to compete against the other parts of his empire.
Unlike some businessman owners he has never treated the club as a discrete entity.
by Waylenstreet » 23 Apr 2013 19:11
by St. Brynjar » 23 Apr 2013 19:41
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Apr 2013 19:46
Waylenstreet As to the money being circulated through the organisation it would be naive to think that doesn't happen..
just as it does at many other clubs.
The issue is that an owner who is a fan of the game has a completely different motivation from one who is doing everyone a favour. And that will effect all kinds of decisions.
That seems so obvious as to need no amplification.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Apr 2013 19:47
St. Brynjar There's no point looking for a scapegoat.
by grey_squirrel » 23 Apr 2013 19:50
by RockheadRumple » 23 Apr 2013 23:20
winchester_royalZacNaloenSJM saw the club primarily as a means of moving money around his business empire.
eh?
Money laundering.
SJM = Clay Davies.
Users browsing this forum: Jammy Dodger, Orion1871, Royals and Racers, savage 4 england and 483 guests