Player of the Season

[melonhead]

number of games is a pretty decent measure of effectiveness in their position in comparison to the other players, their over all contribution to the team compared to others, and consistency of performance over the whole season compared to others

[Ian Royal]

Clearly there's no point persisting with this, because from your point of view we won't see reason, and from our point of view neither will you. So all this really is, is a long winded load of old horse crap.

So why don't we save our fingers on the typing, cut out the attempt to put forward a reasoned argument and just call each other names in the best tradition of TB. Especially seeing as everything you write is a load of old drivel and you're far too stupid to comprehend what we write.

You... bloody... stupid heads.

ok you jizz monkey

I'm on your side you drug addled simpleton!

[P!ssed Off]

I still :facepalm: when I see James Harper as POTS for 02/03

I was at the time, it looked to me that he just stood there, waving his arms about and contributing very little.
Didn't come to appreciate Harper until a couple of seasons after that, when I began to notice more his influence in the team.

[P!ssed Off]

Mcanuff is.a better footballer than some on that list, and would not look out of place on it

Based on this season's performances? It's not a lifetime achievement award, it's Player of the Season.
Are you telling me that McAnuff 2012-2013, or any other current player's 2012-2013 season, reaches anywhere near any of the POTSs on that list?
If so, please tell me who on that list would have been beaten out by McAnuff's 2012-2013 season.

since player of the seasons quality will always to some extent depend on the quality of the season, i dont think thats relevant.
certainly more deserving to be on it than most others this season, especially compared to the 33 games played by the three on the shortlist

Whoever had won, there will always be an * next to POTS 2012-2013 stating "Doesn't count, everyone was shit that year"

[melonhead]

Clearly there's no point persisting with this, because from your point of view we won't see reason, and from our point of view neither will you. So all this really is, is a long winded load of old horse crap.

So why don't we save our fingers on the typing, cut out the attempt to put forward a reasoned argument and just call each other names in the best tradition of TB. Especially seeing as everything you write is a load of old drivel and you're far too stupid to comprehend what we write.

You... bloody... stupid heads.

ok you jizz monkey

I'm on your side you drug addled simpleton!

i know, was just joining in the insults regardless

[Maguire]

I still :facepalm: when I see James Harper as POTS for 02/03

I was at the time, it looked to me that he just stood there, waving his arms about and contributing very little.
Didn't come to appreciate Harper until a couple of seasons after that, when I began to notice more his influence in the team.

It's more the fact that Nicky Forster carried that team all season. Not voting him POTS was just shameful.

Harper had a decent season tbf, just not as good as Forster

[URZZZZ]

I would have chosen
1. Marriappa
2. Mcanuff
3. Mccarthy

[yappy]

I still :facepalm: when I see James Harper as POTS for 02/03

I was at the time, it looked to me that he just stood there, waving his arms about and contributing very little.
Didn't come to appreciate Harper until a couple of seasons after that, when I began to notice more his influence in the team.

It's more the fact that Nicky Forster carried that team all season. Not voting him POTS was just shameful.

Harper had a decent season tbf, just not as good as Forster

Agreed. Thought Harper deserved it in 07/08, couldn't believe it when Hunt was voted ahead of him.

[SCIAG]

Agreed. Thought Harper deserved it in 07/08, couldn't believe it when Hunt was voted ahead of him.

Hahnemann should have won, with Harper and Kitson rounding off the top 3. Hunt scored a few tap ins (and one spectacular goal) but as the season wore on he became less and less effective in open play.

Anyone who thinks McAnuff has been poor probably can't remember Hunt that season, luckily for them.

[Terminal Boardom]

I still :facepalm: when I see James Harper as POTS for 02/03

I was at the time, it looked to me that he just stood there, waving his arms about and contributing very little.
Didn't come to appreciate Harper until a couple of seasons after that, when I began to notice more his influence in the team.

It's more the fact that Nicky Forster carried that team all season. Not voting him POTS was just shameful.

Harper had a decent season tbf, just not as good as Forster

Would Forster have had such a good season without Harper in the side? Who knows. What I still fail to understand is how Dylan Kerr won POTS in 93/94 whereas Jimmy Quinn scored over 40 goals. Probably because most fans have their favourites and don't fully understand the game. That explains the bile directed towards Rosenior and Harper.

[RoyallyFcuked]

Clearly there's no point persisting with this, because from your point of view we won't see reason, and from our point of view neither will you. So all this really is, is a long winded load of old horse crap.

So why don't we save our fingers on the typing, cut out the attempt to put forward a reasoned argument and just call each other names in the best tradition of TB. Especially seeing as everything you write is a load of old drivel and you're far too stupid to comprehend what we write.

You... bloody... stupid heads.

Agreed with that to a certain extent, before I read the last sentenced where I just LOLed. Pathetic really, coming from you? Someone who himself, spends far too much of his life writing pointless drivel, and has been doing so for longer than anyone else of this forum Clearly we are not too stupid to comprehend what you write, because we have in fact explained many reasons as to why what were saying is true, but you have failed to come up with anything to fight it with. I guess we wouldn't understand would we? Or is it because you can't, because were right??? Aww, looks like you lost this one.

[Ian Royal]

Clearly there's no point persisting with this, because from your point of view we won't see reason, and from our point of view neither will you. So all this really is, is a long winded load of old horse crap.

So why don't we save our fingers on the typing, cut out the attempt to put forward a reasoned argument and just call each other names in the best tradition of TB. Especially seeing as everything you write is a load of old drivel and you're far too stupid to comprehend what we write.

You... bloody... stupid heads.

Agreed with that to a certain extent, before I read the last sentenced where I just LOLed. Pathetic really, coming from you? Someone who himself, spends far too much of his life writing pointless drivel, and has been doing so for longer than anyone else of this forum Clearly we are not too stupid to comprehend what you write, because we have in fact explained many reasons as to why what were saying is true, but you have failed to come up with anything to fight it with. I guess we wouldn't understand would we? Or is it because you can't, because were right??? Aww, looks like you lost this one.

Massive

[westendgirl]

Surely the POTS should be chosen based on:

A) how effective they were in their respective position
B) their overall contribution to the team
C) consistency of performance over the whole season

Whether they played well to get us promoted last season - how much they cost - and are they generally nice approachable blokes is irrelevant.

I would add
D) exceeding expectation