melonhead cryptic lack of reasons
What do you mean, reasons for the hype?
It was Tshibola that went with Cooper on tour with United, not Ikpeazu.
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 10:46
melonhead cryptic lack of reasons
by andrew1957 » 01 Jul 2013 10:53
maffffmelonhead cryptic lack of reasons
What do you mean, reasons for the hype?
It was Tshibola that went with Cooper on tour with United, not Ikpeazu.
by melonhead » 01 Jul 2013 10:56
Elm Park Kid Have RFC made any significant missteps with letting young players go in the last 10 years? I suppose Simon Cox was looking like a mistake for a while but not sure now.
by melonhead » 01 Jul 2013 10:56
maffffmelonhead cryptic lack of reasons
What do you mean, reasons for the hype?
.
by ZacNaloen » 01 Jul 2013 11:03
by Wimb » 01 Jul 2013 11:36
by loyalroyal4life » 01 Jul 2013 11:41
by winchester_royal » 01 Jul 2013 11:47
andrew1957 Why was he not contracted at a younger age? The likes of Tishbola and Tanner were. He went off to play a tournament with Man Unt a year or so ago with Cooper if I recall rightly so was obviously highly rated.
by andrew1957 » 01 Jul 2013 11:59
winchester_royalandrew1957 Why was he not contracted at a younger age? The likes of Tishbola and Tanner were. He went off to play a tournament with Man Unt a year or so ago with Cooper if I recall rightly so was obviously highly rated.
That was Tshibola
How many times have you seen Ikpeazu play Andrew? Just wondering..
by winchester_royal » 01 Jul 2013 12:05
by ZacNaloen » 01 Jul 2013 12:06
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 12:19
melonheadmaffffWhat do you mean, reasons for the hype?melonhead cryptic lack of reasons
no, where he says he isnt giving any reasons for th emove on his tweet
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 12:21
winchester_royal Fair enough, apologies on the first point.
As for why he was not contracted, it's probably because his form last season came completely out of the blue. The season before he was playing second fiddle to Samuel, making the odd substitute appearance and not being particularly effective in his cameos. He doesn't posses a huge amount of technical ability (which is what you're looking for in an academy player) and has only really come to the fore because of his physical stature. If you look at the majority of his goals this season they have come from good balls into the box that he has got to because he was able to bully opposition defenders. If he'll be able to do that at senior level then yes it will be a big loss, but as others have pointed out he's been disappointing against those of a similar size to him which doesn't bode particularly well for the future.
In hindsight it was a mistake not getting him signed up earlier, but 12 months ago he wasn't considered to be a top prospect so giving him a 3-year deal would have been daft.
by winchester_royal » 01 Jul 2013 12:23
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 12:36
winchester_royal Tanner=Kuhl>>>>Fosu
I'd have been more upset if we'd lost the first 3
by LightwaterRoyal » 01 Jul 2013 12:52
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 13:11
LightwaterRoyal Dominic Samuel?
by LightwaterRoyal » 01 Jul 2013 13:23
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 13:26
by Norfolk Royal » 01 Jul 2013 13:41
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Keysfield, Royals and Racers and 330 guests