by Hoop Blah » 27 Jun 2013 13:59
by Snowball » 27 Jun 2013 17:07
Hoop Blah A few points to consider in the pointless debate above...
- McLeary plays a higher proportion of his minutes on the pitch towards the end of games when,relatively speaking, goals are more common
- McAnuff takes a lot of corners and the odd free kick and so a few of his assists over the last couple of season come from there, so a bit of an advantage
- Robson-Kanu has been thrown on, and started, up front a number of times and so a direct comparison against other wingers favours him a fair bit
- when we play 4-4-2 the wingers on either side often have slightly different roles and McAnuff's often appears to be more restrained and defensive than the other wing where Kebe, McLeary or Robson-Kanu either don't defend as well or, more likely, are told not to quite as much (Kebe much improved here obviously)
- McAnuff has played centrally for a significant amount of minutes, and not centrally up behind the forwards either so again makes winger comparisons a bit pointless
Basically I don't think the stats cover the above enough.
by Snowball » 27 Jun 2013 17:12
by Ian Royal » 27 Jun 2013 17:20
WestRoyal GAme time buddy. You would expect a winger who starts every game to be right up there if not at the top of the assists chart hence why jobi is.
by WestRoyal » 27 Jun 2013 19:02
Ian RoyalWestRoyal GAme time buddy. You would expect a winger who starts every game to be right up there if not at the top of the assists chart hence why jobi is.
You might want to tell that to all the wingers who don't achieve it. And as Maff showed, McAnuff out performs McCleary in minutes per assist. Especially when you factor in that he's played centrally and less attacking more than any of our other wingers, as Hoop hits on.
So basically, what you're saying is you *think* McCleary's more dangerous. The available stats don't back that up, and it's pretty subjective.
Will McAnuff play a lot? No one but Adkins knows and he may not know yet. But if he does play, it'd be nice to see him get the recognition he deserves for a change. Rather than the unfair criticism he normally gets in favour of players who haven't performed as well as he has.
by WestRoyal » 27 Jun 2013 19:10
Hoop Blah A few points to consider in the pointless debate above...
- McLeary plays a higher proportion of his minutes on the pitch towards the end of games when,relatively speaking, goals are more common
- McAnuff takes a lot of corners and the odd free kick and so a few of his assists over the last couple of season come from there, so a bit of an advantage
- Robson-Kanu has been thrown on, and started, up front a number of times and so a direct comparison against other wingers favours him a fair bit
- when we play 4-4-2 the wingers on either side often have slightly different roles and McAnuff's often appears to be more restrained and defensive than the other wing where Kebe, McLeary or Robson-Kanu either don't defend as well or, more likely, are told not to quite as much (Kebe much improved here obviously)
- McAnuff has played centrally for a significant amount of minutes, and not centrally up behind the forwards either so again makes winger comparisons a bit pointless
Basically I don't think the stats cover the above enough.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2013 01:04
by Snowball » 30 Jun 2013 11:13
by jellytot » 30 Jun 2013 12:09
by SCIAG » 30 Jun 2013 19:53
Snowball Just noticed that Kebe+HRK+McCleary combined are similar minutes to McAnuff's total
35,017 Minutes 82 Goals 93 Assists - - - - - - - - - - - - Kebe + McCleary + HRK Combined
35,017 Minutes 39 Goals 75 Assists - - - - - - - - - - - - McAnuff + 10%
32,074 Minutes 35 Goals 68 Assists - - - - - - - - - - - - McAnuff
The average of HRK-McCleary-Kebe over the same minutes worth an extra 43 Goals and 18 Assists That is a big difference
by Ian Royal » 30 Jun 2013 20:13
by maffff » 30 Jun 2013 20:20
Ian Royal What a thoroughly typical and not even remotely surprising post that is from snowball.
by Ian Royal » 30 Jun 2013 20:25
maffffIan Royal What a thoroughly typical and not even remotely surprising post that is from snowball.
by Snowball » 30 Jun 2013 20:36
by maffff » 30 Jun 2013 20:57
Snowball Matthew 7:6
King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
by Snowball » 01 Jul 2013 10:41
by maffff » 01 Jul 2013 11:28
Snowball Matthew 7:6 IS the point
by MouldyRoyal » 01 Jul 2013 11:29
by Platypuss » 01 Jul 2013 11:34
by Ian Royal » 01 Jul 2013 18:43
Users browsing this forum: 72 bus, Google [Bot] and 133 guests