sandmanIan Royal Put it this way, he's not on my list of posters whose opinions are worth much.
Oh no! How can anyone cope without the approval of Ian Royal and his Reading Player subscription..
You make it when you're not wumming.
by Ian Royal » 28 Jul 2013 23:25
sandmanIan Royal Put it this way, he's not on my list of posters whose opinions are worth much.
Oh no! How can anyone cope without the approval of Ian Royal and his Reading Player subscription..
by Millsy » 28 Jul 2013 23:26
Divvy Quote: LeedsSte
I've heard very reliably (sadly) that Brian McDermott is very close to offering his resignation at Leeds United and has been in "difficult" discussions recently to convince him to stay.
A big part of this could well be linked to Ken Bates' claims that from June 2012, Salem Patel has had the final say on all signings.
Brian was assured he would have funds and full control of who comes in and who goes out. Both promises appear to have been broken already, with McDermott admitting recently he has to sell to buy.
It doesn't sounds at all positive.
by sandman » 29 Jul 2013 00:14
windermere_royalLoyalRoyalFanMan Friday Why? Is runner-up better than first place?
According to Ian Royal, it is.
Adkins the Messiah and all that.
isn`t it gay for a man to love a man?
by Royal91 » 29 Jul 2013 00:16
2 world wars, 1 world cupDivvy Quote: LeedsSte
I've heard very reliably (sadly) that Brian McDermott is very close to offering his resignation at Leeds United and has been in "difficult" discussions recently to convince him to stay.
A big part of this could well be linked to Ken Bates' claims that from June 2012, Salem Patel has had the final say on all signings.
Brian was assured he would have funds and full control of who comes in and who goes out. Both promises appear to have been broken already, with McDermott admitting recently he has to sell to buy.
It doesn't sounds at all positive.
Oh dear I hope this isn't true. Brian's a top bloke.
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Jul 2013 02:12
Ian RoyalLoyalRoyalFanMan Friday Why? Is runner-up better than first place?
According to Ian Royal, it is.
Adkins the Messiah and all that.
No offence chaps, but if you ain't bright enough to work it out on your own, you'll have to find someone else to teach you, because I'm not wasting my time on this sort of lost cause.
by creative_username_1 » 29 Jul 2013 02:16
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Jul 2013 02:29
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Jul 2013 02:51
CypryWoodcote Royal Well done!!! You got there in the end!!
So, as I was suggesting earlier, given the vast difference in resources between McDermott's last Championship campaign and this one, if Adkin's is going to be judged in the same manner you deemed fair and equitable for McDermott, only promotion with flying colours will suffice and any prolonged period outside the top six or, one weekend in the bottom half, should see him on his way.
Condescending bellend...
McDermotts side had been nailed in the bottom three all season and we'd just been beaten in two six point games when he was sacked - you reckon that compares to "one weekend in the bottom half"? God help us...
Brians strategy for the Premier League failed pretty spectacularly - that's the only FACT that exists around this - any comparison between him and Adkins is purely hypothetical, we'll never know whether Adkins could've kept us up if he'd had the benefit of the January window. We'll never know whether Brian could've continued to perform miracles in the Championship having suffered what must have been an utterly humiliating and demoralising season last year.
All that boils my piss is all the talk of "poor old Brian", "he never had any resources", "he wasn't backed in the transfer market" etc etc
I'm 100% convinced that more money was available to Brian, had he chosen to use it. He didn't, he (rightly or wrongly) chose to remain loyal to the players that won the Championship, and sadly that decision cost him his job....
Woodcote Royal Given the vast difference in resources between McDermott's last Championship campaign and this one,if Adkin's is going to be judged in the same manner you deemed fair and equitable for McDermott, only promotion with flying colours will suffice and any prolonged period outside the top six or, one weekend in the bottom half, should see him on his way.
by windermere_royal » 29 Jul 2013 05:19
creative_username_1 Brian wouldn't have got beat by BRovers today - FACT!
by Avon Royal » 29 Jul 2013 06:45
creative_username_1 Brian wouldn't have got beat by BRovers today - FACT!
by Vic_Flange » 29 Jul 2013 07:10
creative_username_1 Brian wouldn't have got beat by BRovers today - FACT!
by stealthpapes » 29 Jul 2013 07:18
So, as I was suggesting earlier, given the vast difference in resources between McDermott's last Championship campaign and this one, if Adkin's is going to be judged in the same manner you deemed fair and equitable for McDermott, only promotion with flying colours will suffice and any prolonged period outside the top six or, one weekend in the bottom half, should see him on his way.
by stealthpapes » 29 Jul 2013 07:20
by Sanguine » 29 Jul 2013 09:21
by sandman » 29 Jul 2013 09:52
by Extended-Phenotype » 29 Jul 2013 10:03
sandman Here's a fun Monday morning fact:
Nigel Adkins has a Premier League relegation on his CV whilst Brian McDermott does not.
Monday morning facts are sponsored by Ian Royal and his Reading Player subscription.
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Jul 2013 10:49
Sanguine Adkins, Adkins, Adkins, W@nk,W@nk, W@nk!!!
by Sanguine » 29 Jul 2013 10:52
Woodcote RoyalSanguine Adkins, Adkins, Adkins, W@nk,W@nk, W@nk!!!
by creative_username_1 » 29 Jul 2013 13:39
Vic_Flangecreative_username_1 Brian wouldn't have got beat by BRovers today - FACT!
Oh dear. The first signs of dementia are setting in.
Its ok creative_username_1 there are lots of groups you can join.
Shall we talk about the good old days of Vera Lynn, rationioning and Arthur Askey on the wireless today?
by creative_username_1 » 29 Jul 2013 13:40
windermere_royalcreative_username_1 Brian wouldn't have got beat by BRovers today - FACT!
That's quite a statement, how do you know? we got knocked out of the cup by Stevenage, why not rovers?
Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 241 guests