Royal Ginger I did not like the 21 shots...I think
I think you misread the question.
by blueroyals » 05 Oct 2013 17:13
Royal Ginger I did not like the 21 shots...I think
by Man Friday » 05 Oct 2013 17:14
by Cureton's Volley » 05 Oct 2013 17:15
by MmmMonsterMunch » 05 Oct 2013 17:17
by blueroyals » 05 Oct 2013 17:19
MmmMonsterMunch On the coach. We deserved to lose. We came to life a bit more 2nd half with the triple sub but ultimately undone by calamity defending. Burnley were well organised but don't think they'll be top 2 come May. Ah well. We move on.
by Royal Ginger » 05 Oct 2013 17:22
blueroyalsMmmMonsterMunch On the coach. We deserved to lose. We came to life a bit more 2nd half with the triple sub but ultimately undone by calamity defending. Burnley were well organised but don't think they'll be top 2 come May. Ah well. We move on.
Which player is our weekend scapegoat?
by MmmMonsterMunch » 05 Oct 2013 17:23
blueroyalsMmmMonsterMunch On the coach. We deserved to lose. We came to life a bit more 2nd half with the triple sub but ultimately undone by calamity defending. Burnley were well organised but don't think they'll be top 2 come May. Ah well. We move on.
Which player is our weekend scapegoat?
by RoyalBlue » 05 Oct 2013 17:24
NewCorkSeth You attributed someone else's quote to me. Please rectify this or I will sue you for defamation.
by URZZZZZ » 05 Oct 2013 17:25
NewCorkSethRoyal GingerURZZZZZ yet they have had like 19 shots,
I don't understand the use of the word "like" in this context.
It is used to set up the following number as a guesstimate. They haven't had 19 shots to his knowledge, they have had "around" that many. 19 shots and 2 goals means McCarthy is in top form.
by soggy biscuit » 05 Oct 2013 17:39
NewCorkSethsoggy biscuit
What if 17 were spooned high over the bar and the 2 on target should have been easily saved?
I refuse to answer your hypothetical query on grounds that it is not the case today so oxf*rd off.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 05 Oct 2013 17:49
soggy biscuitNewCorkSethsoggy biscuit
What if 17 were spooned high over the bar and the 2 on target should have been easily saved?
I refuse to answer your hypothetical query on grounds that it is not the case today so oxf*rd off.
Top goalpost moving!
by FridaysGhost » 05 Oct 2013 22:33
by sandman » 05 Oct 2013 22:37
by FridaysGhost » 05 Oct 2013 22:45
sandman OMG Friday'sGhost, WTF? We must have lost LOL.
by SLAMMED » 05 Oct 2013 22:54
FridaysGhostsandman OMG Friday'sGhost, WTF? We must have lost LOL.
Hello Sandman, have you foumd a brain-cell yet?
by Cureton's Volley » 05 Oct 2013 22:57
SLAMMEDFridaysGhostsandman OMG Friday'sGhost, WTF? We must have lost LOL.
Hello Sandman, have you foumd a brain-cell yet?
Foumd?
by sandman » 05 Oct 2013 23:25
SLAMMEDFridaysGhostsandman OMG Friday'sGhost, WTF? We must have lost LOL.
Hello Sandman, have you foumd a brain-cell yet?
Foumd?
by Pseud O'Nym » 05 Oct 2013 23:56
FridaysGhost Burnleys two forwards are heading towards 20+ goals each this season. Readings complete attacking corps may hit 15 between the four of them. It makes you wonder why so many on this site were determined not to pay for a decent striker, doesn't it?
by creative_username_1 » 06 Oct 2013 01:50
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Google [Bot] and 261 guests