sorry?P!ssed OffAthleticoSpizzNoJinx And we are not Chelsea - thank oxf*rd
but a lot of our "followers" are
Are what?
Or is Chelsea an adjective now?
your "point" is?
by AthleticoSpizz » 29 Nov 2013 22:57
sorry?P!ssed OffAthleticoSpizzNoJinx And we are not Chelsea - thank oxf*rd
but a lot of our "followers" are
Are what?
Or is Chelsea an adjective now?
by Arnie_Pie » 29 Nov 2013 22:58
southbank1871 McAnuff for Obita please Adkins.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Nov 2013 22:59
by P!ssed Off » 29 Nov 2013 22:59
AthleticoSpizzsorry?P!ssed OffAthleticoSpizz No
but a lot of our "followers" are
Are what?
Or is Chelsea an adjective now?
your "point" is?
by Cureton's Volley » 29 Nov 2013 23:02
MmmMonsterMunch He is absolutely determined to see him fail. Very sad given he is supposed to be a Reading fan.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Nov 2013 23:04
Cureton's VolleyMmmMonsterMunch He is absolutely determined to see him fail. Very sad given he is supposed to be a Reading fan.
He was saying it how he saw it, and many of us agreed with him.
by P!ssed Off » 29 Nov 2013 23:05
Cureton's VolleyMmmMonsterMunch He is absolutely determined to see him fail. Very sad given he is supposed to be a Reading fan.
He was saying it how he saw it, and many of us agreed with him.
by Jinx » 29 Nov 2013 23:06
Cureton's VolleyMmmMonsterMunch He is absolutely determined to see him fail. Very sad given he is supposed to be a Reading fan.
He was saying it how he saw it, and many of us agreed with him.
by Cureton's Volley » 29 Nov 2013 23:08
JinxCureton's VolleyMmmMonsterMunch He is absolutely determined to see him fail. Very sad given he is supposed to be a Reading fan.
He was saying it how he saw it, and many of us agreed with him.
But why is it personal with Adkins? We are 4th. The season we won the Chump (2nd time) there were some absolutely dire games Hull and Pompey at home spring to mind
by Cureton's Volley » 29 Nov 2013 23:11
by RoyalBlue » 29 Nov 2013 23:14
genomesouthbank1871 Goals and reaction on SSN after the break.
That usually means sometime in the next hour.
by P!ssed Off » 29 Nov 2013 23:15
Cureton's Volley To be fair I also had my own fair share of words for Brian when he made similarly poor subs. I remember txting in to BBC Berks one time when Jobi and Legs were seemingly invincible from being subbed despite both playing shite and being absolutely knackered after 80 mins...
by sandman » 29 Nov 2013 23:17
by Avon Royal » 29 Nov 2013 23:17
floyd__streete All very well the f*cking Forest fans applauding Gunter off the park, he's been utter sh*t for us from the moment he joined the club, would you like him back
by Avon Royal » 29 Nov 2013 23:17
sandman Well done to the players who won the match despite the best efforts of their manager.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Nov 2013 23:18
by winchester_royal » 29 Nov 2013 23:19
by RoyalBlue » 29 Nov 2013 23:20
Cureton's Volley Why can't people understand that the result and the manager's performance are two separate things?
Is anyone honestly willing to say they would not have made a change before Nigel the ditherer did?
by AthleticoSpizz » 29 Nov 2013 23:22
by RoyalBlue » 29 Nov 2013 23:23
Cureton's VolleyJinxCureton's Volley
But why is it personal with Adkins? We are 4th. The season we won the Chump (2nd time) there were some absolutely dire games Hull and Pompey at home spring to mind
It's not personal. I just think his tactics and team selections are generally gash.
Fair play -Tactics today were MUCH better, but he let himself down with the subs again.
Users browsing this forum: BarryWhiteRFC, Google Adsense [Bot], Snowflake Royal, Sutekh and 259 guests