by Wycombe Royal » 03 Dec 2013 10:00
by Green » 03 Dec 2013 10:12
by Bandini » 03 Dec 2013 11:01
Alexander Litvinenko No. I think the whole scheme is now dead in the water.
Hence no GP station.
by Platypuss » 03 Dec 2013 11:41
Bandini Will this be seen as another hammer blow to Alexander Litvinenko's credibility?
by Wycombe Royal » 03 Dec 2013 14:42
by Green » 03 Dec 2013 14:45
by southbank1871 » 03 Dec 2013 14:48
by Bandini » 03 Dec 2013 15:01
by mr_number » 03 Dec 2013 15:10
Simon Beasley at the council Clearly we don't know how it will be serviced by trains
by southbank1871 » 03 Dec 2013 15:11
by LoyalRoyalFan » 03 Dec 2013 15:18
southbank1871 A monorail would be much more cost effective and fit for purpose.
by bobby1413 » 03 Dec 2013 15:24
by bobby1413 » 03 Dec 2013 15:26
Wycombe Royal http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-25198432
by bobby1413 » 03 Dec 2013 15:27
Wycombe Royal http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-25198432
by chilipepper91 » 03 Dec 2013 23:20
LoyalRoyalFansouthbank1871 A monorail would be much more cost effective and fit for purpose.
Is there a chance the tracks could bend?
by Norfolk Royal » 04 Dec 2013 12:18
bobby1413 Reading should get a tram
by ZacNaloen » 04 Dec 2013 13:01
by bobby1413 » 04 Dec 2013 13:12
Norfolk Royalbobby1413 Reading should get a tram
Just the one?
by Green » 04 Dec 2013 17:28
southbank1871 This announcement is certainly making me think twice about using Dirk as a contractor in the future. If he's not ITK about this, what does that say of his knowledge of the Y2K bug?
by SLAMMED » 04 Dec 2013 21:30
chilipepper91LoyalRoyalFansouthbank1871 A monorail would be much more cost effective and fit for purpose.
Is there a chance the tracks could bend?
Not on your life, my Hindu friend
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests