by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 21:58
by AthleticoSpizz » 07 Dec 2013 22:00
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 22:02
AthleticoSpizz You listened and watched?
by AthleticoSpizz » 07 Dec 2013 22:02
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 22:03
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 22:04
by SPARTA » 07 Dec 2013 22:04
LoyalRoyal22 First half was 433. Second half was a diamond.
That is all.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 22:06
SPARTALoyalRoyal22 First half was 433. Second half was a diamond.
That is all.
Who cares? The problem is it changes every game, and just lately we see 2-3 different systems in the same game. There's no chance for the team to get any consistency or confidence in one particular formation, and the team changes just as often. Dropping Pogrebnyak today when he linked up so well with Sharp on Tuesday was a bizarre decision.
by sandman » 07 Dec 2013 22:08
by Cureton's Volley » 07 Dec 2013 22:26
sandman Boo, LoyalRoyal22, boo.
by AirRaidSiren » 07 Dec 2013 22:29
Cureton's Volley LoyalRoyal22 misses the point again. The reason they were talking in that manner was because the players were not acting as if they knew what formation to be in, or even if they did, exactly where to be positioned and where that would be in relation to team mates.
From my perspective it was not as clear cut as you made out because in the first half for the 1st 20 mins we played more of a 4-5-1 with the wingers out wide hitting the byline, but after that they stayed forward and tucked in tight for a more narrow traditional 4-3-3. Second half there was hardly any structure for either team as it got pretty desperate, and formations became even more fluid towards the final whistle.sandman Boo, LoyalRoyal22, boo.
We should definitely get this chant started next match...
by bcubed » 07 Dec 2013 22:44
Cureton's Volley LoyalRoyal22 misses the point again. The reason they were talking in that manner was because the players were not acting as if they knew what formation to be in, or even if they did, exactly where to be positioned and where that would be in relation to team mates.
From my perspective it was not as clear cut as you made out because in the first half for the 1st 20 mins we played more of a 4-5-1 with the wingers out wide hitting the byline, but after that they stayed forward and tucked in tight for a more narrow traditional 4-3-3. Second half there was hardly any structure for either team as it got pretty desperate, and formations became even more fluid towards the final whistle.
by Man Friday » 07 Dec 2013 22:46
by Royal Prince » 07 Dec 2013 23:15
LoyalRoyal22 First half was 433. Second half was a diamond.
That is all.
by Royal91 » 07 Dec 2013 23:17
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 23:19
Royal PrinceLoyalRoyal22 First half was 433. Second half was a diamond.
That is all.
You sure?
I thought first half was 4-2-3-1, with Sharp the loan striker, and the three 'wingers' playing behind him, with Hal in the middle of the three but swapping with the other two on a regular basis as they moved inside.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 23:20
Cureton's Volley LoyalRoyal22 misses the point again. The reason they were talking in that manner was because the players were not acting as if they knew what formation to be in, or even if they did, exactly where to be positioned and where that would be in relation to team mates.
From my perspective it was not as clear cut as you made out because in the first half for the 1st 20 mins we played more of a 4-5-1 with the wingers out wide hitting the byline, but after that they stayed forward and tucked in tight for a more narrow traditional 4-3-3. Second half there was hardly any structure for either team as it got pretty desperate, and formations became even more fluid towards the final whistle.sandman Boo, LoyalRoyal22, boo.
We should definitely get this chant started next match...
by LoyalRoyal22 » 07 Dec 2013 23:23
by sandman » 07 Dec 2013 23:27
by AthleticoSpizz » 07 Dec 2013 23:28
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 211 guests