HNA approval/disapproval of NA

418 posts

how long should we keep nigel adkins as manager?

get rid of now, his tactics are weak and we can do better
38
16%
give him till the end of december, then we will see where we are
9
4%
give him time to make signings in january and we will assess in march
14
6%
give him till the end of the season, he deserves a full season to show what he can do
103
44%
i am currently happy with our position in the table and the quality of football we are playing. this shouldnt be a discussion
46
20%
other
22
9%
 
Total votes: 232
andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4365
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by andrew1957 » 08 Dec 2013 12:30

But the worrying thing is that we are going backwards. We are worse now than we were at the start of the season.

You can blame injuries but most of the problems are at the back and yesterday the issues were less poor defending than the complete inability to create chances.

I see no sign of improvement whatsoever.

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Man Friday » 08 Dec 2013 12:39

Schards#2 can you name anyone who would do better?

What, do better than play cr@p football? Most mangers actually. Especially Brian.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Hoop Blah » 08 Dec 2013 19:34

andrew1957 But the worrying thing is that we are going backwards. We are worse now than we were at the start of the season.

You can blame injuries but most of the problems are at the back and yesterday the issues were less poor defending than the complete inability to create chances.

I see no sign of improvement whatsoever.


We aren't going backwards andrew, not in my opinion, we're just extremely inconsistent.

If we were going backwards we wouldn't have had poor performances previously (Sheff W, Posh etc) and good performances more recently like Forest.

I agree with Schards that we're struggling to evolve the style as much as I'd hoped. We do in parts, the centre backs getting on the ball and a lot less hopeful hooks into the channels, but we are struggling to create enough. Drenthe and others coming back from injury should help to address that.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by winchester_royal » 08 Dec 2013 19:41

Hoop Blah
andrew1957 But the worrying thing is that we are going backwards. We are worse now than we were at the start of the season.

You can blame injuries but most of the problems are at the back and yesterday the issues were less poor defending than the complete inability to create chances.

I see no sign of improvement whatsoever.


We aren't going backwards andrew, not in my opinion, we're just extremely inconsistent.

If we were going backwards we wouldn't have had poor performances previously (Sheff W, Posh etc) and good performances more recently like Forest.

I agree with Schards that we're struggling to evolve the style as much as I'd hoped. We do in parts, the centre backs getting on the ball and a lot less hopeful hooks into the channels, but we are struggling to create enough. Drenthe and others coming back from injury should help to address that.


Agreed. We actually kept possession quite nicely yesterday, especially in the first 35 minutes where they hardly had a sniff, but when we got into that final third we just didn't have the quality to break through a very resolute Bournemouth defence.

This is where the next window will hopefully be crucial. We don't have the existing quality in the current squad to play through 2 deep banks of four. We're being linked to the likes of Ben Pringle and Dorrans, players who get on the ball and are capable of unlocking defences, and hopefully we'll be able to bring in a couple of players who will make that difference and bring the extra quality needed to take advantage of what is an improving build up game.

It's dull football at the moment because we're not creating chances, and NA is quite rightly getting stick for that, but we also shouldn't ignore the fact that we are starting to look more comfortable playing through the defence and midfield, and because of that I don't think we're a million miles away from getting it right, although admittedly it did seem like that yesterday.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Ian Royal » 08 Dec 2013 19:48

Other:
Not happy with how things are going performance wise, but we've been really hit with injuries and we're decently placed in the league. It won't take much to get some terrific performances and wins out of us. Adkins deserves until at least November. 2014. Unless something drastic happens and we start nosediving into the bottom 8.


AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24533
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by AthleticoSpizz » 08 Dec 2013 19:59

Ian Royal Other:
Not happy with how things are going performance wise, but we've been really hit with injuries and we're decently placed in the league. It won't take much to get some terrific performances and wins out of us. Adkins deserves until at least November. 2014. Unless something drastic happens and we start nosediving into the bottom 8.
not really getting that


He is still the same manager, surely?

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Platypuss » 08 Dec 2013 20:13

Jesus. What a bunch of fickle finger-sniffing bedwetters.

Cureton's Volley
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1633
Joined: 08 Jan 2013 23:58

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Cureton's Volley » 08 Dec 2013 20:22

Platypuss Jesus. What a bunch of fickle finger-sniffing bedwetters.


That's what a lot of were saying (alas, not so eloquently) when people had the knives out for Brian weeks after he won Prem MOTM!

User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27857
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Green » 08 Dec 2013 21:01

FAO team boarders - usa_loyal_royal provides a laugh every now and again but it's a wind up in the style of twitter's @usasoccerguy


User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30856
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by leon » 08 Dec 2013 21:41

Platypuss Jesus. What a bunch of fickle finger-sniffing bedwetters.


Right so you're happy with how things are going? Any areas to improve?

SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6467
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by SCIAG » 08 Dec 2013 22:43

Platypuss Jesus. What a bunch of fickle finger-sniffing bedwetters.

Only 35% of users are even contemplating sacking him soon.

I don't think he should be sacked any time soon. When you sack a manager, it should be because the current guy is doing really badly and bringing in someone can fix the mistakes he was making. This was the case when we sacked Rodgers, and it was the case when we sacked McDermott (who had cost us many points as his tactics/non-selection of Guthrie and Pearce stopped us from holding onto leads).

Right now, I think Adkins is making some questionable team selections (Sharp ahead of Pogrebnyak, HRK in the hole, Cummings over Kelly, Obita and McAnuff being exchanged for no obvious reason), but is also struggling due to injuries. Guthrie hasn't really had a settled midfield partner, and only McCleary has been anything like a regular selection on the wings as the others have been injured or Obita. I don't go to every match, but I think a big part of our problems is lack of familiarity between the players. If we look at the team for Charlton, only McAnuff and Pogrebnyak were regulars in the Premier League under McDermott, and only McAnuff and the centre backs played regularly for us in the Championship (Cummings did, but in his proper position).

In short, I think it will come over time as the players get used to playing with each other, particularly when we form regular partnerships.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Ian Royal » 08 Dec 2013 22:49

AthleticoSpizz
Ian Royal Other:
Not happy with how things are going performance wise, but we've been really hit with injuries and we're decently placed in the league. It won't take much to get some terrific performances and wins out of us. Adkins deserves until at least November. 2014. Unless something drastic happens and we start nosediving into the bottom 8.
not really getting that


He is still the same manager, surely?

Yes he is, but we're judging him on his performance and if it gets that bad then we're in danger of relegation and we need to take action. Brian was a good manager. But his performance drastically dipped so we got rid. Correctly.

The level we're at and the parachute payments we've got, we can afford to give him a season of mediocrity and see if he can build on the next year. If he doesn't look to be improving we get shot at that point. But considering what we're currently getting is not mediocre, let alone poor (we're still top six right?), it's a bit moot. Albeit, poor enough that it's not inconceivable we could slump into mid-table mediocrity.

Big Foot
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8335
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 15:19
Location: #MagicOfTheCup #RoadToWembley

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Big Foot » 09 Dec 2013 00:59

Shouldn't have been appointed in the first place - Adkins OUT


P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by P!ssed Off » 09 Dec 2013 03:56

winchester_royal Agreed. We actually kept possession quite nicely yesterday, especially in the first 35 minutes where they hardly had a sniff, but when we got into that final third we just didn't have the quality to break through a very resolute Bournemouth defence.

This is where the next window will hopefully be crucial. We don't have the existing quality in the current squad to play through 2 deep banks of four. We're being linked to the likes of Ben Pringle and Dorrans, players who get on the ball and are capable of unlocking defences, and hopefully we'll be able to bring in a couple of players who will make that difference and bring the extra quality needed to take advantage of what is an improving build up game.

It's dull football at the moment because we're not creating chances, and NA is quite rightly getting stick for that, but we also shouldn't ignore the fact that we are starting to look more comfortable playing through the defence and midfield, and because of that I don't think we're a million miles away from getting it right, although admittedly it did seem like that yesterday.


Agreed. We need another player in CM as confident on the ball as Guthrie. I've not seen Pringle play but I have seen Anthony Wordsworth play. Saw him play for Colchester United last season and he was clearly a cut above. Great left footed passer, confident on the ball and can play CM or LM. Set piece taker as well. No surprise when a Championship team picked him up in January, only surprise was that it was a team as shit as Ipswich, but they're local to where he's from so that must have been a factor.
He picked up a bad injury early days at Ipswich and hasn't got back in the team since. Now McCarthy's saying he might send him out on loan. I would imagine he just doesn't fit their style (a midfield including S Hunt and Jay Tabb under Mick McCarthy is hardly Nige's tippy-tappy is it?)
A 6 month loan in January, with a view to buy, would be a great bit of business for Reading IMO.

btw Reading would do well to keep an eye on Colchester's CAM, 19 year-old starlet Alex Gilbey. He's been great so far this season and the cheeky oxf*rd is currently refusing to extend his contract beyond the end of the season. Would be a good target in the Summer.
This guy is truly one of League One's top prospects.

Also, what about Reading born, schooled in Yatelely, Jed Wallace? 19 and Portsmouth's best player recently by a mile. Currently going to be a free agent next Summer as well.
Last edited by P!ssed Off on 09 Dec 2013 04:28, edited 1 time in total.

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by sandman » 09 Dec 2013 04:13

Ian Royal
AthleticoSpizz
Ian Royal Other:
Not happy with how things are going performance wise, but we've been really hit with injuries and we're decently placed in the league. It won't take much to get some terrific performances and wins out of us. Adkins deserves until at least November. 2014. Unless something drastic happens and we start nosediving into the bottom 8.
not really getting that


He is still the same manager, surely?

Yes he is, but we're judging him on his performance and if it gets that bad then we're in danger of relegation and we need to take action. Brian was a good manager. But his performance drastically dipped so we got rid. Correctly.

The level we're at and the parachute payments we've got, we can afford to give him a season of mediocrity and see if he can build on the next year. If he doesn't look to be improving we get shot at that point. But considering what we're currently getting is not mediocre, let alone poor (we're still top six right?), it's a bit moot. Albeit, poor enough that it's not inconceivable we could slump into mid-table mediocrity.


Nope, incorrectly. You give a manager in that league enough money then it doesn't matter what tactics or formation you play. See City, Stoke. Guthrie's struggling in the Championship let alone the Premier League and Pearce was forced upon him from higher up.

Too much talk on here about systems, probably a product of too much football manager. Players win you games not systems and we failed to back our manager enough to get the right players in. Meaning he had to make do with signing the likes of the vastly overrated Danny Guthrie.

User avatar
Big Ern
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2987
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 11:50
Location: Sunny, polluted Mexico City

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Big Ern » 09 Dec 2013 04:29

Because we are not running away with the league and people are annoyed shows just how spoilt we have been. I fo one totally support NA, and although things are not 100% right on the pitch at present, he will get there. 6th considering how much he was allowed to spend on players is not a nad acheivement so far and there is a long way to go in the season still.

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12088
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Maguire » 09 Dec 2013 09:02

Totally agree with the point sandman raises about the obession with formations. I saw someone on here yday write something like "if you play two banks of four then you'll probably get relegated". No, you won't. You can win the league playing 4-4-2 if your players are good enough.

Back to Adkins - his biggest problem IMHO is that he's a bellend. Reading fans will never truly warm to him because he comes across as such a helmet. I still think he'll be successful with the right backing from the owner but I literally can't bear to hear him speak, always turn the radio off if he's about to come on.

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26234
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Silver Fox » 09 Dec 2013 09:19

SHORT AND CURLY
Royalee 6th in the table not even half way through the season having inherited a team devoid of confidence with 5 first team starters out injured for long periods of time. Yeah he's shit, sack him. :roll:


Did you see our wins against Yeovil, Forest and Charlton, the loss against Sheff Wed, The draw at Barsnley (where we were played off the park)
Take those gained points away and a more realistic picture emerges


No it doesn't

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by ZacNaloen » 09 Dec 2013 09:33

Maguire Totally agree with the point sandman raises about the obession with formations. I saw someone on here yday write something like "if you play two banks of four then you'll probably get relegated". No, you won't. You can win the league playing 4-4-2 if your players are good enough.

Back to Adkins - his biggest problem IMHO is that he's a bellend. Reading fans will never truly warm to him because he comes across as such a helmet. I still think he'll be successful with the right backing from the owner but I literally can't bear to hear him speak, always turn the radio off if he's about to come on.



I have this problem with Abbie Clancey on Strictly tbf

Hampshire Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1188
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 10:56
Location: Geneva

Re: HNA approval/disapproval of NA

by Hampshire Royal » 09 Dec 2013 09:49

We sacked Brian less than a year ago. It was the wrong decision at the time and I believe that he should have been given this season to prove himself (again).

Adkins was brought in with a very good track record, and he deserves our support as well as enough time to prove himself (again).

Do we really want to be the sort of club that sacks a manager too quickly, especially when the problems we might be having are very little to do with him? And, are people really calling for him to be sacked when we are sixth in the league? Really???

418 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests

It is currently 14 Nov 2024 03:55