by Millsy »
27 Dec 2013 13:27
Royal Ginger This is Rodgers all over again. Couple of seasons to change it please. I can make do with crap games and mid-table finishes for a couple of years if the end result is a better style of play and a future to build on.
Yes and no.
No this isn't Rodgers all over again. Rodgers had zero record, took us into the relegation zone, changed his team around far more than Adkins did and had the audacity to be arrogant and call the season his preseason. Yes he went on to clubs with decent players and did ok with the players he inherited but at the time he was a nobody who basically was clueless with our squad and dragged us into a relegation fight. I didn't agree with his sacking so soon but I wasn't outraged, it was totally reasonable. Adkins on the other has an impeccable record, has us hovering in the playoff zone, seems to have some idea what he's doing and is anything but arrogant or cocky. Like Rodgers he wasn't given the financial backing he was promised but we have every reason to believe he'll do ok with eventual funds, given his record. We can very safely say yes we should stick with him.
Yes though I basically agree with your point but wanted to make it much more obvious. If retrospect we *may* have been ok sticking with Rodgers (although I think he may well have taken us down actually) but we will definitely be ok sticking with Adkins.
Plus To even question Adkins' ability is moronic given we're screwed in terms of ownership so Adkins couldn't /can't strengthen as he wants.