by bcubed » 01 Jan 2014 20:02
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jan 2014 20:06
kwik-silva I'm a little bit confused as to why Adkins moved him to LB when Taylor came on, seemed to kill him a little bit. Adkins unwillingness to change the shape of the team really confuses me. Let's be honest, what's the point in having a striker playing LB, you may as well just go to 3 at the back and push him further up the field.
by SPARTA » 01 Jan 2014 20:08
RoyalBluekwik-silva I'm a little bit confused as to why Adkins moved him to LB when Taylor came on, seemed to kill him a little bit. Adkins unwillingness to change the shape of the team really confuses me. Let's be honest, what's the point in having a striker playing LB, you may as well just go to 3 at the back and push him further up the field.
Wasn't Adkins wanting him to play as a wing back and push up as soon and as much as he could?
by SCIAG » 01 Jan 2014 20:13
SPARTARoyalBluekwik-silva I'm a little bit confused as to why Adkins moved him to LB when Taylor came on, seemed to kill him a little bit. Adkins unwillingness to change the shape of the team really confuses me. Let's be honest, what's the point in having a striker playing LB, you may as well just go to 3 at the back and push him further up the field.
Wasn't Adkins wanting him to play as a wing back and push up as soon and as much as he could?
We went three at the back, but Blackman was to fill in LB if we were tracking back, and bomb forward when we were on the attack. Adkins got his tictacs spot on today, and his subs!
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jan 2014 20:27
SPARTARoyalBluekwik-silva I'm a little bit confused as to why Adkins moved him to LB when Taylor came on, seemed to kill him a little bit. Adkins unwillingness to change the shape of the team really confuses me. Let's be honest, what's the point in having a striker playing LB, you may as well just go to 3 at the back and push him further up the field.
Wasn't Adkins wanting him to play as a wing back and push up as soon and as much as he could?
We went three at the back, but Blackman was to fill in LB if we were tracking back, and bomb forward when we were on the attack. Adkins got his tictacs spot on today, and his subs!
by Avon Royal » 01 Jan 2014 20:32
by 3points » 01 Jan 2014 20:56
by AthleticoSpizz » 01 Jan 2014 21:14
by CountryRoyal » 01 Jan 2014 21:25
by LoyalRoyal22 » 01 Jan 2014 22:01
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 02 Jan 2014 07:39
by harry » 02 Jan 2014 11:21
by dizzynewheights » 02 Jan 2014 11:54
by Eaststandman » 02 Jan 2014 11:58
harry Since McDermott signed him I've struggled to see what either he or Adkins have seen in him. (Often brief) cameos in an inconsistent side weren't probably helping, however he didn't seem to take the opportunities when they came.
Yesterday v forest he showed what he could do. Took on players, looked our most dangerous player, made a couple of mistakes but nothing significant and easily did enough good stuff to make up for them. Cracking shot from distance. Motm. Well played nick. Just hope he can build on this now.
by cpmurph » 02 Jan 2014 12:47
urz13 He played well, he was MOTM but was hardly mind blowing. Had that been a good team performance, I doubt he would have stood out at all. I really don't think he's that good and he made some bad mistakes in the game too, but it's great to see him improving.
by Brum Royal » 02 Jan 2014 12:57
by Ian Royal » 02 Jan 2014 19:20
by MmmMonsterMunch » 04 Jan 2014 16:39
by winchester_royal » 04 Jan 2014 20:17
by Kebe's apprentice » 04 Jan 2014 20:18
winchester_royal The one shining light of the first half. The only player to look like making something happen.
Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 252 guests