by bobby1413 » 05 Jan 2014 07:30
by bobby1413 » 05 Jan 2014 07:35
ZacNaloen Until mid february? fucking hell.
Coppell needed three years and we weren't exactly pulling up tree's early in his time with the club.
Adkins needs backing by the owners. Of which we basicallly have none because they all want out.
by marcusopp » 05 Jan 2014 08:49
bobby1413ZacNaloen Until mid february? fucking hell.
Coppell needed three years and we weren't exactly pulling up tree's early in his time with the club.
Adkins needs backing by the owners. Of which we basicallly have none because they all want out.
Agee.
Anyone who wants Adkins out is a total idiot.
Sack him and get who? We still have the same players. Is there some secret formation? All you posting what team you'd play which is pretty similar to the team we do field.
He needs to get to the season end, clear out the team and re build how he wants.
Just cos we were in the premier league and came down doesn't mean we SHOULD be amazing and dominating. No, we are in a NEW LEAGUE and just because it's lower doesn't mean anything. It's still new and different.
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 05 Jan 2014 09:56
by Platypuss » 05 Jan 2014 10:37
Once were Biscuitmen Appointing Adkins only made sense if Anton was prepared to back him with funds to change the whole ethos of the club to a more passing style.
Reading between the lines this is what Nigel was promised and the basis on which he accepted the job.
If we wanted someone to get the best out out of an average group of championship players then we should have stuck with Brian.
Quite why Anton has had such a change of heart may never be know but -unlike with BR- we are not in any danger of relegation and there are no better candidates likely to take the job with this level of uncertainty so giving Nigel the rest of the season as a minimum seems like the only logical course of action.
by harry » 05 Jan 2014 11:51
PlatypussOnce were Biscuitmen Appointing Adkins only made sense if Anton was prepared to back him with funds to change the whole ethos of the club to a more passing style.
Reading between the lines this is what Nigel was promised and the basis on which he accepted the job.
If we wanted someone to get the best out out of an average group of championship players then we should have stuck with Brian.
Quite why Anton has had such a change of heart may never be know but -unlike with BR- we are not in any danger of relegation and there are no better candidates likely to take the job with this level of uncertainty so giving Nigel the rest of the season as a minimum seems like the only logical course of action.
This is also how I see the situation.
()
by Uke » 05 Jan 2014 12:01
Once were Biscuitmen Appointing Adkins only made sense if Anton was prepared to back him with funds to change the whole ethos of the club to a more passing style.
Reading between the lines this is what Nigel was promised and the basis on which he accepted the job.
If we wanted someone to get the best out out of an average group of championship players then we should have stuck with Brian.
Quite why Anton has had such a change of heart may never be know but -unlike with BR- we are not in any danger of relegation and there are no better candidates likely to take the job with this level of uncertainty so giving Nigel the rest of the season as a minimum seems like the only logical course of action.
by RoyalBlue » 05 Jan 2014 13:08
The Real Sandhurst Royal Simple, Adkins. he selects the team, sets out the formation and tells the players the way he want them to play.
He does not know what formation to play.
He plays players out of position - McCleary is a winger, Obita is a winger use em.
The players first reaction is to look back instead of continuing to move forward, manager tactics!!!
Our midfield is simply not good enough as they don't know what to do being very confused week on week by the manager tactics!!.
Le Fondre should be playing up front
by floyd__streete » 05 Jan 2014 13:44
by Cureton's Volley » 05 Jan 2014 13:48
by ILoveMoonPig » 05 Jan 2014 14:24
by Avon Royal » 05 Jan 2014 14:50
by semtex1871 » 05 Jan 2014 15:59
RoyalBlue
Le Fondre should be playing up front for what reason? He had a full game there yesterday and made not a jot of difference because, like our other strikers, he is going to find it very hard to score when the team aren't creating chances. And when he's not scoring goals ALF has less to offer in his overall game than those who have been starting ahead of him.
by Berry » 05 Jan 2014 19:17
by Optimist » 05 Jan 2014 19:21
Berry Play like Forest, Watched them demolish Wet Sham earlier on and what sprung to mind was how similar our players are to Forest....The difference being that Forest play to a system that everyone seems to know and enjoy, Guthrie and Reid, Lansbury and Baird, Surely Its not that difficult to have a succesful Midfield partnership as Forest do....Thoughts?
by Berry » 05 Jan 2014 19:25
LacosteBerry Play like Forest, Watched them demolish Wet Sham earlier on and what sprung to mind was how similar our players are to Forest....The difference being that Forest play to a system that everyone seems to know and enjoy, Guthrie and Reid, Lansbury and Baird, Surely Its not that difficult to have a succesful Midfield partnership as Forest do....Thoughts?
Twat
by sandman » 05 Jan 2014 19:26
LacosteBerry Play like Forest, Watched them demolish Wet Sham earlier on and what sprung to mind was how similar our players are to Forest....The difference being that Forest play to a system that everyone seems to know and enjoy, Guthrie and Reid, Lansbury and Baird, Surely Its not that difficult to have a succesful Midfield partnership as Forest do....Thoughts?
Twat
by MmmMonsterMunch » 05 Jan 2014 19:31
by sandman » 05 Jan 2014 19:35
MmmMonsterMunch The team we got 3 points and stole another off?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests