by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Jan 2014 20:51
by Victor Meldrew » 11 Jan 2014 20:56
3points A Watford supporting friend of mine just posted this comment on Facebook
"having to suffer a really sh*t Watford team lose to a one dimensional hoofball outfit."
by Winchester Royal » 11 Jan 2014 20:57
AthleticoSpizzYes it was Sir Steve's early days with us.ILoveMoonPigRoyalwaster
We lost 3:0 two games in a row didn't we - against CP and Wimb .... two of the most inept home performances ever. Who was our manager then - AP or SC?
Have a feeling it was SC. I think it might actually have been three 3-0 defeats in a row. That game against Crystal Palace pretty much kick-started Andy Johnson's career.
IIRC the third 3-0 defeat was at home to Watford (of all the teams) in the cup...I was there when Lloyd O came on, and was the only player that looked like actually doing absolutely anything.
by windermere_royal » 11 Jan 2014 20:59
by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Jan 2014 21:01
by Winchester Royal » 11 Jan 2014 21:09
windermere_royal i believe we went to Watford the following Saturday in the league and won 1-0 , so i guess he wasn`t laughing then
by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2014 21:30
AthleticoSpizz palms of hands held skywards
by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Jan 2014 21:34
by JIM » 11 Jan 2014 21:42
by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Jan 2014 21:43
by paultheroyal » 11 Jan 2014 21:48
JIM Please can someone explain, WHam stopped for 9 min due to injury, game finished 30 seconds after Reading .
by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2014 21:53
by Muskrat » 11 Jan 2014 22:34
by SydenhamRoyal » 11 Jan 2014 22:36
Ian RoyalThe Real Sandhurst RoyalWe are a better team without Guthrie.
+1
Currently. He's still comfortably our best midfielder. Poor form doesn't equal shit player.
by RoyalBlue » 11 Jan 2014 22:40
Muskrat 1 minute 26 seconds of first half injury time and 7 minutes of second half injury time according to the beeb, so about right.
by bloody Volvo driver » 11 Jan 2014 23:00
JIM Please can someone explain, WHam stopped for 9 min due to injury, game finished 30 seconds after Reading .
by ILoveMoonPig » 11 Jan 2014 23:35
AthleticoSpizz mmmmm
definately remember a 0-3 Watford game on a cold winters evening about then Winch...but their goals came a long time before the 90th minute
....will have to consult the history books
by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Jan 2014 23:36
by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2014 23:40
SydenhamRoyalIan Royal
Currently. He's still comfortably our best midfielder. Poor form doesn't equal shit player.
I agree he is out best midfielder, maybe even best player. But maybe he is wrong for the team. The last game we won before today was ... away to Huddersfield. When he was suspended. He slows it down too much. It might be because the others can't read him well enough, but the fact remains that we were much zippier today in our play, and it was without him.
by SydenhamRoyal » 12 Jan 2014 00:25
Ian RoyalSydenhamRoyalIan Royal
Currently. He's still comfortably our best midfielder. Poor form doesn't equal shit player.
I agree he is out best midfielder, maybe even best player. But maybe he is wrong for the team. The last game we won before today was ... away to Huddersfield. When he was suspended. He slows it down too much. It might be because the others can't read him well enough, but the fact remains that we were much zippier today in our play, and it was without him.
Might be better off short term with him out. But once the team is in better form and we've got a more settled 11 and system, he'll be a real positive again. Like he was at the start of the season, when he was playing like a nailed on PotS.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Bing [Bot], Biscuit goalie, Clyde1998, Mid Sussex Royal and 158 guests