by Ian Royal » 12 Jan 2014 00:31
by ankeny » 12 Jan 2014 09:17
by Uke » 12 Jan 2014 09:29
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jan 2014 09:39
by Uke » 12 Jan 2014 09:42
by Terminal Boardom » 12 Jan 2014 10:43
Ian RoyalTerminal Boardom No1ReadingFan is back - or whatever his name was.
1teaminberks
Working with the public every day, I can't tell if he's genuinely stupid, has genuine mental health or learning problems, or is just putting it on for some weird trolling pleasure.
One of which is infinitely more depressing. Even though the others are a sign of how terribly society serves those who need a little more help and care.
by FridaysGhost » 12 Jan 2014 15:56
Ian Royal If everyone finds it so offensive, can I suggest they stop quoting it repeating it all over the thread and making it a real shit for the moderators to then get rid of if they so choose. Assuming any of you have actually hit the 'snitch switch'.
Obviously I agree the post is totally contemptible, so not trying to defend it.
by ankeny » 12 Jan 2014 16:09
by paultheroyal » 12 Jan 2014 16:12
FridaysGhostIan Royal If everyone finds it so offensive, can I suggest they stop quoting it repeating it all over the thread and making it a real shit for the moderators to then get rid of if they so choose. Assuming any of you have actually hit the 'snitch switch'.
Obviously I agree the post is totally contemptible, so not trying to defend it.
I logged in to amend/remove the said post because I realised that it would be taken the wrong way by some - in fact the Moderators had already removed it which saved me the bother. I was merely saying -'Beware what you wish for'.
I do not know many Man U fans who are happy to see their club used as a bank by American Owners. I was attempting to comment on THEIR view of their clubs Ownership amid seeming glee that we would similarly be owned.
If anyone was offended by the said post, I am happy to apologise unreservedly as it was my fault I tried to make the comment short and snappy - thus allowing anyone to read whatever they wished into it! In fact, the contentious sentence was a quote from a Man U. fan and I should have made that clear.
I hope that this clears the matter up.
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jan 2014 16:18
by multisync1830 » 12 Jan 2014 16:32
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jan 2014 16:35
by multisync1830 » 12 Jan 2014 16:40
FridaysGhostIan Royal If everyone finds it so offensive, can I suggest they stop quoting it repeating it all over the thread and making it a real shit for the moderators to then get rid of if they so choose. Assuming any of you have actually hit the 'snitch switch'.
Obviously I agree the post is totally contemptible, so not trying to defend it.
I logged in to amend/remove the said post because I realised that it would be taken the wrong way by some - in fact the Moderators had already removed it which saved me the bother. I was merely saying -'Beware what you wish for'.
I do not know many Man U fans who are happy to see their club used as a bank by American Owners. I was attempting to comment on THEIR view of their clubs Ownership amid seeming glee that we would similarly be owned.
If anyone was offended by the said post, I am happy to apologise unreservedly as it was my fault I tried to make the comment short and snappy - thus allowing anyone to read whatever they wished into it! In fact, the contentious sentence was a quote from a Man U. fan and I should have made that clear.
I hope that this clears the matter up.
by paultheroyal » 12 Jan 2014 17:06
multisync1830 he has already explained what happened and apologised to everyone so we should move on.
by Handsome Man » 12 Jan 2014 17:09
multisync1830FridaysGhostIan Royal If everyone finds it so offensive, can I suggest they stop quoting it repeating it all over the thread and making it a real shit for the moderators to then get rid of if they so choose. Assuming any of you have actually hit the 'snitch switch'.
Obviously I agree the post is totally contemptible, so not trying to defend it.
I logged in to amend/remove the said post because I realised that it would be taken the wrong way by some - in fact the Moderators had already removed it which saved me the bother. I was merely saying -'Beware what you wish for'.
I do not know many Man U fans who are happy to see their club used as a bank by American Owners. I was attempting to comment on THEIR view of their clubs Ownership amid seeming glee that we would similarly be owned.
If anyone was offended by the said post, I am happy to apologise unreservedly as it was my fault I tried to make the comment short and snappy - thus allowing anyone to read whatever they wished into it! In fact, the contentious sentence was a quote from a Man U. fan and I should have made that clear.
I hope that this clears the matter up.
Seems good enough to me but I understand football supporters are a terribly sensitive bunch..
by sandman » 12 Jan 2014 17:10
multisync1830FridaysGhostIan Royal If everyone finds it so offensive, can I suggest they stop quoting it repeating it all over the thread and making it a real shit for the moderators to then get rid of if they so choose. Assuming any of you have actually hit the 'snitch switch'.
Obviously I agree the post is totally contemptible, so not trying to defend it.
I logged in to amend/remove the said post because I realised that it would be taken the wrong way by some - in fact the Moderators had already removed it which saved me the bother. I was merely saying -'Beware what you wish for'.
I do not know many Man U fans who are happy to see their club used as a bank by American Owners. I was attempting to comment on THEIR view of their clubs Ownership amid seeming glee that we would similarly be owned.
If anyone was offended by the said post, I am happy to apologise unreservedly as it was my fault I tried to make the comment short and snappy - thus allowing anyone to read whatever they wished into it! In fact, the contentious sentence was a quote from a Man U. fan and I should have made that clear.
I hope that this clears the matter up.
Seems good enough to me but I understand football supporters are a terribly sensitive bunch..
by Ian Royal » 12 Jan 2014 17:16
by Unbelievable Jeff » 12 Jan 2014 17:33
Ian Royal So... Anyone think there'll be an announcement tomorrow. Or perhaps by Friday?
Presumably STAR has its finger on the pulse.
by dogzbollox » 12 Jan 2014 19:08
by Royal Rother » 12 Jan 2014 21:57
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, cornflake, Polonia and 315 guests