by 3points » 28 Jan 2014 23:28
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Jan 2014 00:16
3points Pog was rumoured to have got a 4m signing on fee. Guthrie and McCleary would both have got decent signing on fees as well as they were free agents when we signed them. People also forget that Roberts is still on the wage bill. Plus we sacked McDermott and all his staff - they would have all had their contracts paid up as well.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Jan 2014 00:18
by P!ssed Off » 29 Jan 2014 02:32
MmmMonsterMunch3points Pog was rumoured to have got a 4m signing on fee. Guthrie and McCleary would both have got decent signing on fees as well as they were free agents when we signed them. People also forget that Roberts is still on the wage bill. Plus we sacked McDermott and all his staff - they would have all had their contracts paid up as well.
Behave!! A £4m sign on fee?! No chance. IF he was on £53k pw, that would mean almost an additional year & half's salary. Doubt even the likes of Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal etc would pay that sort of money out.
Honestly where do people get this sh1t from?
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 29 Jan 2014 03:22
by Royal Rother » 29 Jan 2014 06:07
by Platypuss » 29 Jan 2014 08:27
Royal Rother I'm not certain but suspect they would be in the wages figure.
Who did we sign for a transfer fee in the year to June 2013?
by Royal Rother » 29 Jan 2014 09:16
by Green » 29 Jan 2014 09:52
MmmMonsterMunch3points Pog was rumoured to have got a 4m signing on fee. Guthrie and McCleary would both have got decent signing on fees as well as they were free agents when we signed them. People also forget that Roberts is still on the wage bill. Plus we sacked McDermott and all his staff - they would have all had their contracts paid up as well.
Behave!! A £4m sign on fee?! No chance. IF he was on £53k pw, that would mean almost an additional year & half's salary. Doubt even the likes of Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal etc would pay that sort of money out.
Honestly where do people get this sh1t from?
by UpThePrem » 29 Jan 2014 10:15
Royal RotherGreen How was the purchase of the training ground at Bearwood factored into the accounts - is it a lump sum this year or is staggered?
If it's all this year I'd imagine that would change things quite a bit.
£3m+ addition to Fixed Assets - I assume this would be Bearwood? Doesn't have an impact on the Profit & Loss a/c (bar a small amount of Depreciation).
by Elm Park » 29 Jan 2014 10:35
MmmMonsterMunch To the OP - do you have the long term liabilities and director's loan numbers on there too? Would be interested to see what those are...
by Royal Rother » 29 Jan 2014 13:38
UpThePremRoyal RotherGreen How was the purchase of the training ground at Bearwood factored into the accounts - is it a lump sum this year or is staggered?
If it's all this year I'd imagine that would change things quite a bit.
£3m+ addition to Fixed Assets - I assume this would be Bearwood? Doesn't have an impact on the Profit & Loss a/c (bar a small amount of Depreciation).
Has any money changed hands yet?? I thought the acquisition of Bearwood was still subject to planning permission and Contracts have only been exchanged but not completed.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Jan 2014 13:50
P!ssed OffMmmMonsterMunch3points Pog was rumoured to have got a 4m signing on fee. Guthrie and McCleary would both have got decent signing on fees as well as they were free agents when we signed them. People also forget that Roberts is still on the wage bill. Plus we sacked McDermott and all his staff - they would have all had their contracts paid up as well.
Behave!! A £4m sign on fee?! No chance. IF he was on £53k pw, that would mean almost an additional year & half's salary. Doubt even the likes of Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal etc would pay that sort of money out.
Honestly where do people get this sh1t from?
Not that unbelievable.
He was a high profile free transfer, contrary to the title they rarely move for 'free'.
A team like the ones you've mentioned would think absolutely nothing of a £4m signing on fee if they were getting a 1st team regular in with no transfer fee involved.
by Royal Rother » 29 Jan 2014 13:51
Elm ParkMmmMonsterMunch To the OP - do you have the long term liabilities and director's loan numbers on there too? Would be interested to see what those are...
I don't know about Directors Loans but Other Long Term Finance is £40.2m (up from £39.7m)
Also, interestingly Bank Loans are £4,501,194 (up from £26,934) so we are able to use bank loans again after they all had to repaid a few years ago.
And this offset by a similar reduction in short term finance, now £5.1m from £9.1m (Directors short term Loans?)
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Jan 2014 13:52
Royal Rother I don't know. But iirc the accounts showed £3m+ addition to Land & Buildings so, going by what had been posted earlier, I assumed that was for Bearwood.
by Royal Rother » 29 Jan 2014 13:54
Green How was the purchase of the training ground at Bearwood factored into the accounts - is it a lump sum this year or is staggered?
If it's all this year I'd imagine that would change things quite a bit.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 29 Jan 2014 13:56
by Green » 29 Jan 2014 14:23
MmmMonsterMunch another one for the OP - do we know our carried forward losses then?
I'd say a £2.3m loss is a good effort by the club & it's in pretty good health. Especially given the CAT A investment & the clear spike in player wages.
by mr_number » 29 Jan 2014 14:50
by mr_number » 29 Jan 2014 14:50
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests