Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caskey

178 posts
User avatar
brighton_royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3219
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 12:34
Location: 60lb chain.

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by brighton_royal » 08 Mar 2014 17:15

USA_Loyal_Royal did hector play well today? i would assume so since brighton only had a couple shots with 0 on target.


Yes. Athletic and assured.

Jake however looked like a panicking child.

USA_Loyal_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2540
Joined: 21 May 2012 14:14
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by USA_Loyal_Royal » 08 Mar 2014 17:18

brighton_royal
USA_Loyal_Royal did hector play well today? i would assume so since brighton only had a couple shots with 0 on target.


Yes. Athletic and assured.

Jake however looked like a panicking child.

awesome! we need to get him playing more he could be a great asset for the future. shame about taylor though, adkins really rates him in training. hes 22 i believe so he really needs to start playing more consistently. especially after he has had all that experience at lower levels.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Ian Royal » 08 Mar 2014 17:18

bcubed
Royal Ginger 57 shots in the last two games and only 2 goals, one of which was an own goal.


Least we are creating chances

25 off target
19 blocked
13 on target
1 goal

It's crazy compared to a month or so ago, when almost everything was flying in. From what I've seen, we start well and if we get the early goal we relax and often punish teams. But if we don't get that goal we get a little complacent with the good start, allow the other team back in it and then drop a stupid clanger to go behind. From there we have little composure and snatch at everything in desperation to put it right.

And we just can't cope with a team set up to play defensively, denying us the opportunity to break on them.

We'll come good again for at least a few games before the end of the season though. We're by no means particularly bad. Just a little clueless at times.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by ZacNaloen » 08 Mar 2014 17:20

13 shots blocked?

Sounds like we had Brighton camped and couldn't find a way through. Arsenal syndrome.

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26248
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Silver Fox » 08 Mar 2014 17:23

With Fulham in their way down and the playoffs being an ultimately fruitless expense I'm pretty happy with the way the season is unfolding


the taphouse
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: 13 Mar 2013 17:44
Location: calcot

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by the taphouse » 08 Mar 2014 17:25

Royal Ginger
the taphouse Tshibola anyone...Just got splinters on his buttocks Today :!:


He was only ever there to make up the numbers.

Let the Boy go Charging in and cause Havoc :) oxf*rd it.

Victor Meldrew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6716
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 19:22
Location: South Coast

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Victor Meldrew » 08 Mar 2014 17:27

USA_Loyal_Royal
brighton_royal
USA_Loyal_Royal did hector play well today? i would assume so since brighton only had a couple shots with 0 on target.


Yes. Athletic and assured.

Jake however looked like a panicking child.

awesome! we need to get him playing more he could be a great asset for the future. shame about taylor though, adkins really rates him in training. hes 22 i believe so he really needs to start playing more consistently. especially after he has had all that experience at lower levels.


Adkins seems to rate everybody in training, especially Kanu and Blackman neither of whom ever seems to live up to it.

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11962
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by bcubed » 08 Mar 2014 17:34

Ian Royal
bcubed
Royal Ginger 57 shots in the last two games and only 2 goals, one of which was an own goal.


Least we are creating chances

25 off target
19 blocked
13 on target
1 goal

It's crazy compared to a month or so ago, when almost everything was flying in. From what I've seen, we start well and if we get the early goal we relax and often punish teams. But if we don't get that goal we get a little complacent with the good start, allow the other team back in it and then drop a stupid clanger to go behind. From there we have little composure and snatch at everything in desperation to put it right.

And we just can't cope with a team set up to play defensively, denying us the opportunity to break on them.

We'll come good again for at least a few games before the end of the season though. We're by no means particularly bad. Just a little clueless at times.


Exactly that

And if we could just stop making stupid mistakes...

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by winchester_royal » 08 Mar 2014 17:34

In the car.

We played some decent stuff the. I was massively disappointed with what we saw last week, but today there were signs of progress apparent again. Not least through the performance of Hector who looked very much at home at this level up against one of the best strikers in the league. He's composed, athletic, and sharp in the tackle. He's also 10x the footballer of the other centre backs. Very promising.

We should have won though. Not enough penetration in the final third meant we couldn't take advantage of some excellent buid up play. Guthrie is back to form, controlling things in the middle, and Drenthe was quite sublime in moments. Fitness still an issue though, NA made the right decision bringing him off so he's for Leeds. They'll love him up there.

Jobi's miss was typical McAnuff. Did well to break through, but absolutely no composure when it mattered. A massive opportunity missed and he knew it.

Happy enough with what was on display though, there's some light at the end of the tunnel again, which is all I really expected from this season.

Oh, and Brighton fans are the biggest bunch of bumtards that I've encountered this season. Reputation is well deserved.


Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3637
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Royalwaster » 08 Mar 2014 17:43

Think today showed again what NA is up against - most other teams fighting for play-offs when losing one of their key strikers would have brought in someone on loan ... NA had to make do. Shame we couldn't get the win today as it sounds like we deserved it.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Woodcote Royal » 09 Mar 2014 00:43

Quite.

On the other hand; Thoughout his entire time managing us as this level, McDermott would have lost a limb in order to have been "up against" it in the way poor Nige finds himself.

However, I agree with those who say we should take the positives from these situations.

To go from failing to beat 8 men to failing beat 10 in one short week is progress indeed.

Eat your heart out, Brian.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11777
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by RoyalBlue » 09 Mar 2014 04:45

Woodcote Royal Quite.

On the other hand; Thoughout his entire time managing us as this level, McDermott would have lost a limb in order to have been "up against" it in the way poor Nige finds himself.

However, I agree with those who say we should take the positives from these situations.

To go from failing to beat 8 men to failing beat 10 in one short week is progress indeed.

Eat your heart out, Brian.



F*ck me, more rewriting of history in order to damn Adkins and make out that Brian had it hard in contrast!

Brian had a fair amount of money to sepnd last season and chose to sign the likes of Akpan and Blackman. Following the Anton/Madejski cockups and unfulfilled commitments of transfer funding, Adkins has largely had to make do with the players that his predecessor signed. Did he even choose to sign Drenthe (hopefullynow coming good) or was he a gift from Anton?

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Woodcote Royal » 09 Mar 2014 16:15

RoyalBlue
Woodcote Royal Quite.

On the other hand; Thoughout his entire time managing us as this level, McDermott would have lost a limb in order to have been "up against" it in the way poor Nige finds himself.

However, I agree with those who say we should take the positives from these situations.

To go from failing to beat 8 men to failing beat 10 in one short week is progress indeed.

Eat your heart out, Brian.



F*ck me, more rewriting of history in order to damn Adkins and make out that Brian had it hard in contrast!


As opposed to your version that blames our Chairman for every ill ever to afflict mankind.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Ian Royal » 09 Mar 2014 18:49

You're as bad as each other. Although RB has redeeming features.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Woodcote Royal » 10 Mar 2014 01:31

He appears to have a life and is certainly less up himself than you.......................to that extent I agree.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Platypuss » 10 Mar 2014 07:35

Q: You're locked in a room with Woodcote Royal and RoyalBlue. You have a gun loaded with a single bullet. Who do you shoot first?














A: Yourself.

User avatar
HoneyRoastHoax
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1228
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 09:22

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by HoneyRoastHoax » 10 Mar 2014 09:16

Impressed with Hector, looked up for it and happy to pass it around, always willing to take the ball. Even had a good little run in the second half.

Danny Guthrie was spreading the play quite nicely but seemed to run out of ideas when it came to the killer ball.

Alf - strange one, pretty much made no tackles. won no headers, made no passes to speak of. Although the balls to him weren't ideal, we may as well have not have had him on the pitch.

Royston looked to be our biggest threat going forward although I noticed on a couple of occasions he didn't want the overlap ball. He wanted the ball to his standing feet then run at them. Well taken goal though.

Jobi - Hang your head in shame for missing that.

McCarthys distribution was much better although the own goal was laughable.

Akpan tidied up nicely but offered very little going forward.

A reasonable performance against a good side.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Brighton (a) - Match Thread, Sponsored but Forster-Caske

by Woodcote Royal » 11 Mar 2014 17:04

Platypuss Q: You're locked in a room with Woodcote Royal and RoyalBlue. You have a gun loaded with a single bullet. Who do you shoot first?














A: Yourself.


If only there were a stampede to talk you out of it.................................

178 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Keysfield, Royals and Racers and 327 guests

It is currently 19 Nov 2024 21:04