by Vision » 02 Apr 2014 15:32
by YateleyRoyal » 02 Apr 2014 15:36
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 02 Apr 2014 15:48
Vision Since cross posting seems to be all the rage I'll put the cat among the pidgeons on here as well
The Lord God Murty would whore himself out to any Media outlet desperate to take him in order to prep a media career whilst being "injured" for us but I don't recall anyone complaining then.
Truth is nobody actually knows what agreement Roberts has with the club with regards to media/match day committments but he was certainly fairly high profile media wise before we signed him so it seems a bit odd to hammer him for it now. Don't blame the player, blame the club for giving a lucrative 2 year deal to a player of his advancing years whose physical style was always likely to catch up with him.
Just another supposed "fan pleasing" deal struck by Anton that has lead to the need for another buyout
by Hampshire Royal » 02 Apr 2014 15:51
by Vision » 02 Apr 2014 15:53
YateleyRoyal Not sure Murty's the same though - he just did it whilst injured, not retired. He went on to play for another club after us.
by YateleyRoyal » 02 Apr 2014 15:58
Hampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
by Royal Lady » 02 Apr 2014 15:58
Hampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
by BR2 » 02 Apr 2014 16:00
Hampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
Hampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Apr 2014 16:02
Royal LadyHampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
Who mentioned freeloading and I hope to god you're not trying to call ME racist.
by Royal Lady » 02 Apr 2014 16:03
by Hampshire Royal » 02 Apr 2014 16:05
Royal Lady Oh don't be so bloody preposterous. I'd say the same if it were Gorkss, Pog, McCarthy, Feds - his colour has absolutely nothing to do with it, as you all well know, except for Hampshire Royal
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Apr 2014 16:09
Royal Lady Oh don't be so bloody preposterous. I'd say the same if it were Gorkss, Pog, McCarthy, Feds - his colour has absolutely nothing to do with it, as you all well know, except for Hampshire Royal
by BR2 » 02 Apr 2014 16:16
Hampshire RoyalRoyal Lady Oh don't be so bloody preposterous. I'd say the same if it were Gorkss, Pog, McCarthy, Feds - his colour has absolutely nothing to do with it, as you all well know, except for Hampshire Royal
You might be right, but three out of those four are Jonny-Foreigners.
by Hampshire Royal » 02 Apr 2014 16:18
BR2Hampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
He is an ex-footballer not a current player.
Most self-employed people have to pay their own way to progress in a career.
Don't you start making this racist,I thought you were better than that.
Murty(Long-serving captain of our club)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Roberts(short term player at our club) so naturally people would support Murty over Roberts even if he is Scottish.
by Uke » 02 Apr 2014 16:19
Royal Lady As I put on the Buyout thread, is it just me, or if we are still paying him to the end of the season, shouldn't he still be at least watching and supporting his current team mates in their games, rather than earning loads more dosh commentating on games for 5Live or whatever?
by Uke » 02 Apr 2014 16:21
YateleyRoyalHampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
But it's not the same, is it. Not in my eyes anyway. I have no problem with anyone doing any media work whilst injured - raises the profile of the club too. My issue is with Roberts continuing to be paid by us, despite retiring - and even though that isnt until the end of the season, he still wont play again, and is happy to pick up a paycheque.
by Royal Lady » 02 Apr 2014 16:22
by BR2 » 02 Apr 2014 16:26
Hampshire RoyalBR2Hampshire Royal Hmmmmm... some people are condemning Roberts and supporting Murty for doing essentially the same thing. Now here's a quiz - which one of those two is black?
And as far as Roberts taking advantage of something that his contributions to his Union provides, how is that 'freeloading'?
He is an ex-footballer not a current player.
Most self-employed people have to pay their own way to progress in a career.
Don't you start making this racist,I thought you were better than that.
Murty(Long-serving captain of our club)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Roberts(short term player at our club) so naturally people would support Murty over Roberts even if he is Scottish.
Both Roberts and Murty were important factors in us getting promoted to the PL. Short term or not, it's generally accepted that Roberts was an important part of the later promotion. I've no idea how much PFA subs are, but why shouldn't he take advantage of his contributions and take a course provided by the union? And, RL, of course it's not a race issue - all I was doing was trying to put a point forward, and I wasn't calling YOU a racist. Having said that, you are, apparently, a member of the right wing of politics so I'm just using stereotypes. And, while Murty was recovering from his injury, he was earning money from media work. What makes it worse in Murty's case is that the benefit of his expensive recuperation, paid for by RFC, was taken advantage of by another team (Charlton, I think).
Also, Directors of a company are not self-employed, they are officers of that company.
by melonhead » 02 Apr 2014 16:31
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 192 guests