by Gunnarsson's_Gunners » 04 May 2014 12:53
by Mr Angry » 04 May 2014 13:00
USA_Loyal_Royal ownership and injuries is what i went with. AZ promising money then disappearing and leaving us in the shitter. then the ridiculous string of injuries that led us to have wingers play in the middle of the pitch, players out of position, etc.
by genome » 04 May 2014 13:05
by SCIAG » 04 May 2014 13:06
by Ouroboros » 04 May 2014 13:31
by Ian Royal » 04 May 2014 14:56
SCIAG With such narrow margins, all those things are to blame. If any of them had been a little better at just one crucial moment, we would have made the playoffs.
I would blame three things for our failure to secure a spot the way that Derby and QPR did.
1) Injuries. Roberts' season long injury left us severely short up front (except for three months). We spent huge chunks of the season with three of our first four central midfielders injured, and a few times had all four out. At one stage we were down to four defenders. Our wingers have stayed fit though, bar Drenthe (and his bereavement).
2) Player performance. Le Fondre and McCleary are clearly talented players, but they're both far too inconsistent. If they turned it on (nearly) every week, we would have been fine.
3) Selection. Adkins has not shown enough faith in young players. We spent too long with right backs at left back - admittedly putting Obita there was something of a masterstroke, but if it has happened earlier... HRK is no good behind the striker. Blackman isn't suited to either of our systems. Hector is not a midfielder, and should have been ahead of Gorkss. Taylor has been neglected all season, as has Tshibola. In fairness, Adkins sees them in training and we don't, but Taylor's impressive performances have surely warranted selection ahead of Akpan more often.
by The Cube » 04 May 2014 15:28
by USA_Loyal_Royal » 04 May 2014 15:34
The Cube The only way I could choose two options would be if the poll was expanded to have Nigel Adkins twice.
I mean, this fool even had us playing for a draw towards the end of the game on Saturday (and I'm not just saying that with the benefit of hindsight - it was obviously stupid at the time).
by genome » 04 May 2014 15:34
The Cube The only way I could choose two options would be if the poll was expanded to have Nigel Adkins twice.
I mean, this fool even had us playing for a draw towards the end of the game on Saturday (and I'm not just saying that with the benefit of hindsight - it was obviously stupid at the time).
by Pepe the Horseman » 04 May 2014 15:56
Ouroboros I blame Reading Dave.
by Pseud O'Nym » 04 May 2014 16:04
Ouroboros I blame Reading Dave.
by Ian Royal » 04 May 2014 16:27
The Cube The only way I could choose two options would be if the poll was expanded to have Nigel Adkins twice.
I mean, this fool even had us playing for a draw towards the end of the game on Saturday (and I'm not just saying that with the benefit of hindsight - it was obviously stupid at the time).
by Pepe the Horseman » 04 May 2014 16:32
Ian RoyalThe Cube The only way I could choose two options would be if the poll was expanded to have Nigel Adkins twice.
I mean, this fool even had us playing for a draw towards the end of the game on Saturday (and I'm not just saying that with the benefit of hindsight - it was obviously stupid at the time).
Not to me. I posed the question on the 'You're the manager - what would you do thread' and I can quite clearly remember looking at the clock in the the last 10 minutes and thinking, we'll we're clearly not playing for the draw then.
If we were playing for a draw, why did we have 7 shots in the last 15 minutes to their 1?
Revisionist nonsense.
by TheBaldOne » 04 May 2014 17:07
by harry » 04 May 2014 17:45
Pepe the HorsemanIan RoyalThe Cube The only way I could choose two options would be if the poll was expanded to have Nigel Adkins twice.
I mean, this fool even had us playing for a draw towards the end of the game on Saturday (and I'm not just saying that with the benefit of hindsight - it was obviously stupid at the time).
Not to me. I posed the question on the 'You're the manager - what would you do thread' and I can quite clearly remember looking at the clock in the the last 10 minutes and thinking, we'll we're clearly not playing for the draw then.
If we were playing for a draw, why did we have 7 shots in the last 15 minutes to their 1?
Revisionist nonsense.
Yep. Fair enough if people have got a problem with Adkins, but to say we were playing for a draw is utter bollocks.
by Whatevs » 04 May 2014 17:58
P!ssed Off Make no mistake it has been a failure of a season.
Looking at the predictions (of neutrals) at the start of the season you'd have to say Reading and Bolton have been the Championship's top 2 underachievers.
A large number of factors are to blame for our failure this season. Only a fool would tell you that it was any one or two things.
Players have underperformed.
Manager has underperformed.
Injuries have taken their toll.
Owner has been a dick.
If your definition of a supporter is "tell the players how oxf*rd perfect they are even when they're clearly shit" then I, along with quite a few other fans have underperformed.
by The Cube » 04 May 2014 18:22
by Ian Royal » 04 May 2014 18:31
by RoyalBlue » 04 May 2014 19:30
USA_Loyal_RoyalThe Cube The only way I could choose two options would be if the poll was expanded to have Nigel Adkins twice.
I mean, this fool even had us playing for a draw towards the end of the game on Saturday (and I'm not just saying that with the benefit of hindsight - it was obviously stupid at the time).
what on earth are you going on about? it was quite obvious that we were playing for the win. for gods sake we had one deflected off the line, and an mccleary one on one that should have gone in barring a massive save from their keeper, and there was another one or two huge chances. all these chances on another day could have easily gone in for us.
by SHORT AND CURLY » 04 May 2014 19:51
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 149 guests