by WAZZOCK » 10 May 2014 22:03
by SpaceCruiser » 10 May 2014 23:16
WAZZOCK There doesn't need to be any logic, it's a fact.
Let's just accept I'm right and move on.
by harry » 11 May 2014 00:11
Hoop Blah It's all about having enough to differentiate each kit from the previous to make people buy the latest one.
If they stuck to the kit we nearly all want, ie a simple narrow'ish blue and white hoops with white shorts and socks, they couldn't flog as many every season.
by SpaceCruiser » 11 May 2014 00:27
harryHoop Blah It's all about having enough to differentiate each kit from the previous to make people buy the latest one.
If they stuck to the kit we nearly all want, ie a simple narrow'ish blue and white hoops with white shorts and socks, they couldn't flog as many every season.
Remember to post this every July
by Very near...far away » 11 May 2014 09:18
by 1871 not 1998 » 11 May 2014 13:14
SPARTAroyalgrumpy The Puma contract runs until the end of next season (14/15), but they haven't signed a new deal yet. They've been speaking to new suppliers over the last couple of months. No idea about the Waitrose contract.
by tmesis » 11 May 2014 13:21
SpaceCruiserharryHoop Blah It's all about having enough to differentiate each kit from the previous to make people buy the latest one.
If they stuck to the kit we nearly all want, ie a simple narrow'ish blue and white hoops with white shorts and socks, they couldn't flog as many every season.
Remember to post this every July
Actually, no, we need to remind the oxf*rd that we need hoops....and no oxf*rd back panels!
by Ian Royal » 11 May 2014 14:50
by tmesis » 11 May 2014 18:10
by Cureton's Volley » 11 May 2014 18:23
by Blue & White Soup » 11 May 2014 19:55
Cureton's Volley The argument abut needing to 'change it up' to sell more shirts is BS. Until we have a 'proper Reading' kit none of my family are buying any.
The idea of having a traditional kit every 5 years or so sounds like a good compromise, but one Puma are unfortunately too stupid to comprehend.
by Ian Royal » 11 May 2014 20:22
Blue & White SoupCureton's Volley The argument abut needing to 'change it up' to sell more shirts is BS. Until we have a 'proper Reading' kit none of my family are buying any.
The idea of having a traditional kit every 5 years or so sounds like a good compromise, but one Puma are unfortunately too stupid to comprehend.
Id rather have a new set every season. Couldn't stand playing in the same kit season in season out.. and its always exciting when it comes out
by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 09:58
by TFF » 12 May 2014 10:18
by Ian Royal » 12 May 2014 18:20
SPARTA It's all about the £'s though. As long as kit sales continue trending at the levels they are, then the club will be happy to exploit the mugs that cough up every summer.
by Ian Royal » 12 May 2014 20:12
by USA_Loyal_Royal » 12 May 2014 20:55
Ian Royal ooooo that Donny kit is niiiiiice. I'd take that it Blue and White.
by Royal Ginger » 12 May 2014 21:30
by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:22
USA_Loyal_RoyalIan Royal ooooo that Donny kit is niiiiiice. I'd take that it Blue and White.
+infinity
i am in love with that, but since most of us would like it, the club are surely not going to choose that one.
they will pick the worst, cheapest, template puma has.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests