by genome » 15 May 2014 18:03
by Agent Balti » 15 May 2014 18:37
by AthleticoSpizz » 15 May 2014 19:02
Objection re. Obitamaffff The post I just made over in players released has made me err even further away from McDermott. Yes he sometimes did well taking a punt on a lot of kids and cheap signings, and was instrumental in us signing Long/Doyle - although that came about by way of Dolan, so thanks for that Eamo/Pat!
Anyway, in his three and a half seasons managing us McDermott handed Taylor and Samuel one appearance off the bench each and was was very very risk adverse when it came to giving McCarthy the opportunity to start sticking at times with Federici who was drastically out of form and never gave Obita a look in.
We've now got Obita as player of the season, Hector looking embedded, Taylor has started to have a few games and if he sticks with us will get a few appearances. Finances may be forcing it upon us but it feels like there's finally a path emerging to the first team which in part looks like it was blocked by the manager.
by Ian Royal » 15 May 2014 19:09
by Zana Badawi » 15 May 2014 19:19
AthleticoSpizzObjection re. Obitamaffff The post I just made over in players released has made me err even further away from McDermott. Yes he sometimes did well taking a punt on a lot of kids and cheap signings, and was instrumental in us signing Long/Doyle - although that came about by way of Dolan, so thanks for that Eamo/Pat!
Anyway, in his three and a half seasons managing us McDermott handed Taylor and Samuel one appearance off the bench each and was was very very risk adverse when it came to giving McCarthy the opportunity to start sticking at times with Federici who was drastically out of form and never gave Obita a look in.
We've now got Obita as player of the season, Hector looking embedded, Taylor has started to have a few games and if he sticks with us will get a few appearances. Finances may be forcing it upon us but it feels like there's finally a path emerging to the first team which in part looks like it was blocked by the manager.
Portsmouth could not (even) give us Obita back (early) when they had him on loan...yes he scored the goal whilst on loan at (and for) Oldham v Liverpool.....but in MaccyD's days....he was basically w4nk.
He isn't now...that's plain to see...but the lack of inclusion to our team during Brians reign was absolutely justified.
by AthleticoSpizz » 15 May 2014 19:22
Try working in Portsmouth (at the time...and after) and asking about Obita, IanIan Royal That just aint true Spizz.
by The Quiet Man » 15 May 2014 20:43
RoyalBlueThe Quiet Man Not sure what the argument is about blooding youth and MCD. I saw Obita's debut under him and was underwhelmed and he was never going to displace the wingers in the side who got to a play off final and won the league. If NA hadn't switched Obita to full back this season would he have had the run of appearances he got this season. Week in week out consistent winger he wasn't compared to McCleary and Mcanuff and he may have struggled to keep his place.
Samuel frankly looked what he was on his debut, a boy in a man's game. Suspect with injuries and others coming through he aint going to make the grade at championship level let alone prem.
Taylor has done what so far, even NA wasn't convinced otherwise how come he didn't play at Bournemouth or feature at all for 2 months.
Also love the Nameless argument that NA didn't get any of his signings in the team. Whose fault was that? The guy was brought in 5 weeks before the prem season ended and had the whole of the summer to do something!
Yes, the guy who was misled (lied to?) by the owner(s) when they were trying to get him to join and then wasn't provided with the promised finances. Rest assured he knew who he wanted to sign, unfortunately he was then twarted in the summer when the funding wasn't available to secure those targets. Absolute lunacy to suggest that the failure to bring players in was his fault.
Difference is that Adkins had the professionalism to keep quiet during the season, and concentrate on doing his best to achieve success on limited resources whilst hit by numerous injuries to key players, but then had the balls to speak out and state how it had been (broken promises by owners) at the end. In contrast Brian stayed quiet - lips sealed as part of his pay-off deal?
by Cureton's Volley » 16 May 2014 09:57
The Quiet ManRoyalBlueThe Quiet Man Not sure what the argument is about blooding youth and MCD. I saw Obita's debut under him and was underwhelmed and he was never going to displace the wingers in the side who got to a play off final and won the league. If NA hadn't switched Obita to full back this season would he have had the run of appearances he got this season. Week in week out consistent winger he wasn't compared to McCleary and Mcanuff and he may have struggled to keep his place.
Samuel frankly looked what he was on his debut, a boy in a man's game. Suspect with injuries and others coming through he aint going to make the grade at championship level let alone prem.
Taylor has done what so far, even NA wasn't convinced otherwise how come he didn't play at Bournemouth or feature at all for 2 months.
Also love the Nameless argument that NA didn't get any of his signings in the team. Whose fault was that? The guy was brought in 5 weeks before the prem season ended and had the whole of the summer to do something!
Yes, the guy who was misled (lied to?) by the owner(s) when they were trying to get him to join and then wasn't provided with the promised finances. Rest assured he knew who he wanted to sign, unfortunately he was then twarted in the summer when the funding wasn't available to secure those targets. Absolute lunacy to suggest that the failure to bring players in was his fault.
Difference is that Adkins had the professionalism to keep quiet during the season, and concentrate on doing his best to achieve success on limited resources whilst hit by numerous injuries to key players, but then had the balls to speak out and state how it had been (broken promises by owners) at the end. In contrast Brian stayed quiet - lips sealed as part of his pay-off deal?
Bollocks. Adkins was 100% Zingarevich's selection. He had all summer to have got players into the club. So did he find out like the manager before him that what an owner says and does can be widely different and that if AZ wants luxury players then you are paid to make them play, that's your job. What has Adkins to moan about being he has been f*cking well paid for this season's 'achievements' and if he doesn't like being so well paid I'm sure he has got enough credit in the game to get another job.
by Vic_Flange » 16 May 2014 10:34
The Quiet ManRoyalBlueThe Quiet Man Not sure what the argument is about blooding youth and MCD. I saw Obita's debut under him and was underwhelmed and he was never going to displace the wingers in the side who got to a play off final and won the league. If NA hadn't switched Obita to full back this season would he have had the run of appearances he got this season. Week in week out consistent winger he wasn't compared to McCleary and Mcanuff and he may have struggled to keep his place.
Samuel frankly looked what he was on his debut, a boy in a man's game. Suspect with injuries and others coming through he aint going to make the grade at championship level let alone prem.
Taylor has done what so far, even NA wasn't convinced otherwise how come he didn't play at Bournemouth or feature at all for 2 months.
Also love the Nameless argument that NA didn't get any of his signings in the team. Whose fault was that? The guy was brought in 5 weeks before the prem season ended and had the whole of the summer to do something!
Yes, the guy who was misled (lied to?) by the owner(s) when they were trying to get him to join and then wasn't provided with the promised finances. Rest assured he knew who he wanted to sign, unfortunately he was then twarted in the summer when the funding wasn't available to secure those targets. Absolute lunacy to suggest that the failure to bring players in was his fault.
Difference is that Adkins had the professionalism to keep quiet during the season, and concentrate on doing his best to achieve success on limited resources whilst hit by numerous injuries to key players, but then had the balls to speak out and state how it had been (broken promises by owners) at the end. In contrast Brian stayed quiet - lips sealed as part of his pay-off deal?
Bollocks. Adkins was 100% Zingarevich's selection. He had all summer to have got players into the club. So did he find out like the manager before him that what an owner says and does can be widely different and that if AZ wants luxury players then you are paid to make them play, that's your job. What has Adkins to moan about being he has been f*cking well paid for this season's 'achievements' and if he doesn't like being so well paid I'm sure he has got enough credit in the game to get another job.
by winchester_royal » 16 May 2014 10:41
by Tilehurstsouthbank » 16 May 2014 10:42
Bandini The sad thing is that if Anton had been willing to eat humble pie, even with just a few games to go, he could have got Brian back and we would have been in the playoffs.
by Maguire » 16 May 2014 11:06
Ian RoyalCureton's Volley As Mags says, Brian did A LOT BETTER with much less.
cough £26m wage budget and a team with a winning habit cough.
by floyd__streete » 16 May 2014 12:17
MaguireIan RoyalCureton's Volley As Mags says, Brian did A LOT BETTER with much less.
cough £26m wage budget and a team with a winning habit cough.
WTF does "team with a winning habit" mean?
And what's the wage bill this year?
by Silver Fox » 16 May 2014 12:25
by Extended-Phenotype » 16 May 2014 13:00
by Cureton's Volley » 16 May 2014 14:42
by Nameless » 16 May 2014 14:59
Cureton's Volley So to conclude:
Brian: The right decision?
No, it wasn't.
by Elm Park Pasty » 16 May 2014 15:04
Cureton's Volley So to conclude:
Brian: The right decision?
No, it wasn't.
by Cureton's Volley » 16 May 2014 15:05
NamelessCureton's Volley So to conclude:
Brian: The right decision?
No, it wasn't.
Although no one seems to have ruled out the 'yes it was' option
by Pepe the Horseman » 16 May 2014 15:08
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill and 199 guests