by Nameless » 25 May 2014 20:37
by North Somerset Royal » 25 May 2014 22:33
PlatypussNorth Somerset Royal
I fear that the logistics may be:-
1) Demolish stadium, hotel and training centre
2) build shopping centre, hotel etc
3) build new ground at Didcot whilst ground sharing with Oxford or Swindon in the meantime
4) rename us Thames Valley Royals
IN!
. Sir Dodger Royal (@SirDodgerRoyal)
24/05/2014 14:07
Newsflash: Due to #readingfc financial crisis. Next seasons games due to be played at Didcot FC. Will all season ticket holders get in?
by West Stand Flash » 25 May 2014 23:19
by SPARTA » 25 May 2014 23:27
by kwik-silva » 25 May 2014 23:49
West Stand Flash Jonny Fordham has just added to Twitter that Mohit Burman will pay the 3M Tax Bill if we enter in to exclusive talks with him.
by sandman » 25 May 2014 23:59
SPARTAsandmanSpaghettiHoop We've got enough shops in Reading. Let's go with the Indian guy.
Yeah but then you'll have four shops, one for each corner of the Stadium.
by SPARTA » 26 May 2014 00:00
kwik-silvaWest Stand Flash Jonny Fordham has just added to Twitter that Mohit Burman will pay the 3M Tax Bill if we enter in to exclusive talks with him.
Jonny Fordham @JonnyFordham
Mohit Burman has told #readingfc he will help pay their tax bills of around £3m if they enter into exclusive talks with him
I doubt pay it outright.
by UpThePrem » 26 May 2014 00:22
Namelessmultisync1830
They added the new wing of the hotel and media suite long after the original build so that isn't correct.
On per existing foundations ....
There are no foundations of any kind under the car park so you would have to dig very deep. And if the proposal is to put several floors of car parking and a service yard under the shopping centre you would definitely pierce the membrane sealing the contaminated refuse from the groundwater.
Of course it's doable but we the Shard and the Olympic stadium may just have had larger budgets available...
by Mike Hunt » 26 May 2014 00:50
by Mike Hunt » 26 May 2014 00:53
by THE HUMAN BISCUIT » 26 May 2014 08:57
by Uke » 26 May 2014 09:05
by THE HUMAN BISCUIT » 26 May 2014 09:09
by THE HUMAN BISCUIT » 26 May 2014 09:11
by multisync1830 » 26 May 2014 09:12
THE HUMAN BISCUIT You mean 'squib'? Squids, of course, are always damp.
by Uke » 26 May 2014 09:14
THE HUMAN BISCUIT You mean 'squib'? Squids, of course, are always damp.
by Terminal Boardom » 26 May 2014 09:35
by peterroyal76 » 26 May 2014 10:45
THE HUMAN BISCUIT 'Wittle'? You mean 'peter'? Or, possibly, 'witter', which would also be incorrect. Excuse my witling!
by Royalwaster » 26 May 2014 11:17
Terminal Boardom I don't know if anyone else has mentioned this but the Mad Stad site is built on an old landfill site. This would result with a problem if building permanent structures as the build up of methane could result in some nasty explosions down the line. Whereas a shopping complex and housing would be of benefit to both club and community, it would cost a fortune to decontaminate the land so I doubt it would be a starter.
by winchester_royal » 26 May 2014 11:51
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 133 guests