by Green » 04 Jun 2014 17:52
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Jun 2014 14:05
floyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
by floyd__streete » 05 Jun 2014 14:24
Extended-Phenotypefloyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
Might be at his next interview.
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Jun 2014 14:31
floyd__streeteExtended-Phenotypefloyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
Might be at his next interview.
The next panel who interview him are more likely to take the excellent job he did at Reading into consideration over a year spent under a rotten regime at Leeds. Good luck to him anyway, I am sure we'd all agree with that.
by Ian Royal » 05 Jun 2014 20:23
floyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
Mark McGhee got sacked by Wolves. Didn't make his departure from Reading in 1994 somehow less disappointing.
by floyd__streete » 05 Jun 2014 20:56
Ian Royalfloyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
Mark McGhee got sacked by Wolves. Didn't make his departure from Reading in 1994 somehow less disappointing.
Not really comparable seeing as he left when we wanted him to stay and McDermott was sacked.
by Ian Royal » 05 Jun 2014 21:19
by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2014 08:35
floyd__streeteIan Royalfloyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
Mark McGhee got sacked by Wolves. Didn't make his departure from Reading in 1994 somehow less disappointing.
Not really comparable seeing as he left when we wanted him to stay and McDermott was sacked.
Come on Ian, you are better than me having to explain this to you:
McGhee failing and being sacked at Wolves didn't make it any less gutting at the time that a good manager decided to leave us.
McDermott failing and being sacked at Leeds doesn't make it any less of a bad decision at the time to get rid of a good manager. And that decision doesn't look much better even now tbh.
by floyd__streete » 06 Jun 2014 12:29
by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2014 13:54
by Vic_Flange » 06 Jun 2014 14:15
by Green » 06 Jun 2014 14:16
by Zana Badawi » 06 Jun 2014 14:35
Ian Royal Not really comparable seeing as he left when we wanted him to stay and McDermott was sacked.
by Nameless » 06 Jun 2014 17:12
Zana BadawiIan Royal Not really comparable seeing as he left when we wanted him to stay and McDermott was sacked.
Who is this we?
Madejski wouldn't have sacked him.
Given you are somebody who likes to pull out the 'Wah! Wah! Wah!' cliché, Im surprised you are so easy to judge a manager solely by their league position. Don't behave so privileged. We've spent a year on here saying that we shouldn't misjudge Adkins because the club is going down the sh1tter. So surely its a colossal double standard to not apply that to MacDermott as well? We're in no better a position now having changed managers - so what was the point of the change?
by Ian Royal » 06 Jun 2014 17:22
Zana BadawiIan Royal Not really comparable seeing as he left when we wanted him to stay and McDermott was sacked.
Who is this we?
Madejski wouldn't have sacked him.
Given you are somebody who likes to pull out the 'Wah! Wah! Wah!' cliché, Im surprised you are so easy to judge a manager solely by their league position. Don't behave so privileged. We've spent a year on here saying that we shouldn't misjudge Adkins because the club is going down the sh1tter. So surely its a colossal double standard to not apply that to MacDermott as well? We're in no better a position now having changed managers - so what was the point of the change?
by Bandini » 06 Jun 2014 18:00
floyd__streeteIan Royalfloyd__streete What happened at Leeds is utterly irrelevant to this argument.
Mark McGhee got sacked by Wolves. Didn't make his departure from Reading in 1994 somehow less disappointing.
Not really comparable seeing as he left when we wanted him to stay and McDermott was sacked.
Come on Ian, you are better than
by Green » 06 Jun 2014 18:17
by floyd__streete » 06 Jun 2014 20:47
Ian Royal I was fully behind Coppell after he got us relegated.
by Ian Royal » 06 Jun 2014 21:03
floyd__streeteIan Royal I was fully behind Coppell after he got us relegated.
So why were you fully against Brian being given a full season to get us back to where he had taken us, as we did with Coppell
by leon » 06 Jun 2014 21:52
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Mr Angry, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 118 guests