by AthleticoSpizz » 16 Oct 2014 20:52
by From Despair To Where? » 16 Oct 2014 21:01
RoyalBlue Professional footballers are a bit different from 'the ordinary man in the street' and they get extremely well rewarded for the 'burden' of being treated differently.
They have very high public profiles and are seen by many, particularly youngsters, as role models. So Mr Evans, through his conduct and apparent lack of public remorse despite being found guilty, has IMO forfeited his right to return to his highly paid profession. However, having done his time he is perfectly entitled to take up an ordinary job elsewhere out of the public limelight.
by Royal Ginger » 16 Oct 2014 23:27
by sandman » 17 Oct 2014 08:45
by Elm Park Pasty » 17 Oct 2014 08:46
Royalwaster
Not sure it's right to say that the psychological damages is the same .... being assaulted in public and fearing for my life I'd say would result in more psychological damage to most people, than having sex with someone when blind-drunk .... (and not even being able to remember that it happened - in this case, it only came out that CE had had sex with the girl based on his own admission I think).
by Pepe the Horseman » 17 Oct 2014 09:25
sandman Parents are role models not footballers.
by Royal Ginger » 17 Oct 2014 10:46
Pepe the Horsemansandman Parents are role models not footballers.
What if your parents are footballers?
by Royal Ginger » 17 Oct 2014 10:50
sandman Parents are role models not footballers.
by tidus_mi2 » 17 Oct 2014 11:08
by PieEater » 17 Oct 2014 11:29
RoyalBlue Professional footballers are a bit different from 'the ordinary man in the street' and they get extremely well rewarded for the 'burden' of being treated differently.
They have very high public profiles and are seen by many, particularly youngsters, as role models. So Mr Evans, through his conduct and apparent lack of public remorse despite being found guilty, has IMO forfeited his right to return to his highly paid profession. However, having done his time he is perfectly entitled to take up an ordinary job elsewhere out of the public limelight.
by strap » 17 Oct 2014 17:57
by Ian Royal » 17 Oct 2014 19:04
strap Anyone who seriously thinks footballers are role models does need to wake up and smell the coffee. As with "reality" tv "stars", x-factor contestants et al, they are nothing more than a bunch of overpaid prima donnas or wannabees. I suppose the challenge today is to make the impressionable understand this fact.
Quite how many young kids will look at Evans' crime and think it is "cool", "acceptable" or will want to try to copy it, is a moot point. I suspect, (hope?), very very very few - or is it actually me being naive??
by P!ssed Off » 17 Oct 2014 20:42
by Ian Royal » 17 Oct 2014 23:44
by P!ssed Off » 18 Oct 2014 00:06
Ian Royal Given he was convicted, yes, legally we can and he is.
Can we be absolutely certain? Well if you want to get into a debate about whether we can ever know anything for certain, no. But we know that the vast majority of 12 people who heard all the evidence thought he was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Not only that but I'm not aware there was any appeal attempts, which tends to rule out the idea there was some dodgy evidence or miscarriage of justice. So I have to say its a rather bizarre question and one I, personally, find rather disturbing. And your answer even more so.
by Sutekh » 18 Oct 2014 07:15
by JakeTheRoyal » 18 Oct 2014 07:52
by Armadillo Roadkill » 18 Oct 2014 08:04
by semtex1871 » 18 Oct 2014 08:15
by PieEater » 18 Oct 2014 09:28
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests