by Horsham Royal » 20 Oct 2014 21:32
by Mike Hunt » 21 Oct 2014 05:10
by Silver Fox » 21 Oct 2014 11:34
by BonBoh » 21 Oct 2014 12:13
by BonBoh » 21 Oct 2014 12:14
by genome » 21 Oct 2014 12:28
by Gordons Cumming » 21 Oct 2014 12:34
by RoyalBlue » 21 Oct 2014 14:07
by ManchesterRoyals » 21 Oct 2014 14:11
by Royal Ginger » 21 Oct 2014 14:27
by Brum Royal » 21 Oct 2014 16:59
by Froomes » 21 Oct 2014 17:05
by Colchester Royal » 21 Oct 2014 17:33
by Ian Royal » 21 Oct 2014 17:38
by genome » 21 Oct 2014 21:09
genome We'll concede three.
by Ian Royal » 21 Oct 2014 21:12
Ian Royal If we don't see the same back four and middle two I think we might surprise Bournemouth. Although I wouldn't rule us out in any case, but that midfield with that defence will leave us very fragile. As long as we can stay within 1 goal of the opposition we're always in contention... the problem comes when we go behind and then concede a sloppy second straight away, or just before / after the half.
We've been leaking goals, but from what I've seen and heard that's largely been due to clinical finishing and individual errors. I don't think our current run is an accurate reflection of how good we are despite our well documented woes. I don't think we're bad enough to keep leaking goals like that constantly, although we'll let in plenty over the season. We've certainly been creating chances and challenging for pens and sooner or later those are going to start going in again.
2-1
Murray, Cox.
by Froomes » 21 Oct 2014 21:19
Froomes 3-2 Bournemouth, after we go 2 nil up and inevitably bottle it and concede 3 soft goals...
No Fixed Abode I can't see Reading winning this one.
by floyd__streete » 22 Oct 2014 13:38
Ian Royal As long as we can stay within 1 goal of the opposition we're always in contention... the problem comes when we go behind and then concede a sloppy second straight away, or just before / after the half.
Ian Royal that pretty much sums up what went wrong
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Bing [Bot] and 232 guests