by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:23
by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:25
by Sanguine » 22 Oct 2014 09:29
by Wycombe Royal » 22 Oct 2014 09:32
by windermere_royal » 22 Oct 2014 09:33
by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:35
by Sanguine » 22 Oct 2014 09:35
by Martin41 » 22 Oct 2014 09:37
by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:38
by Sanguine » 22 Oct 2014 09:44
by under the tin » 22 Oct 2014 09:45
by wingnut » 22 Oct 2014 09:47
Pepe the Horseman Interesting* to note that when we did this when Bri left, Adkins was the winner with 33% of the votes.
by Wycombe Royal » 22 Oct 2014 09:48
Sanguine We really need to take a step back and think about what Reading FC looks like from the outside. Our current ownership situation surely makes us an unattractive proposition.
by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:53
wingnutPepe the Horseman Interesting* to note that when we did this when Bri left, Adkins was the winner with 33% of the votes.
Also interesting* to note that when Rodgers was given the boot, absolutely no one picked Bri.
by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:54
by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Oct 2014 09:54
by bobby1413 » 22 Oct 2014 09:57
by under the tin » 22 Oct 2014 09:58
Wycombe RoyalSanguine We really need to take a step back and think about what Reading FC looks like from the outside. Our current ownership situation surely makes us an unattractive proposition.
Does it? Can you explain that please? I'm not saying you are wrong but with new owners in place now with potential money to invest I would say we are more attractive than we have been for a while.....
by Ouroboros » 22 Oct 2014 10:06
Pepe the Horseman Interesting* to note that when we did this when Bri left, Adkins was the winner with 33% of the votes.
by tidus_mi2 » 22 Oct 2014 10:08